Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

In article , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs.

On 10/04/2012 8:17 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs.

Unfortunately there are no good men. Zimmerman is a victim.

--
Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and
other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay
for it leave, they can all share having nothing.

On 4/10/2012 2:07 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote:

In , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs.

Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely
innocent, is NEVER a wash.

And right now the guy has a hit out on him, it ain't cheap to hide,
'specially when you are hiding from a whole administration and
presidential campaign...

In article , says...

On 4/10/2012 2:07 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote:

In , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs.

Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely
innocent, is NEVER a wash.

And right now the guy has a hit out on him, it ain't cheap to hide,
'specially when you are hiding from a whole administration and
presidential campaign...

You hide by starting up a for profit website????? And just WHO has this
"hit" on him?

On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:10:52 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 4/10/2012 2:07 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote:

In , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs.

Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely
innocent, is NEVER a wash.

And right now the guy has a hit out on him, it ain't cheap to hide,
'specially when you are hiding from a whole administration and
presidential campaign...

Oh, wow, Hannity couldn't have said it better.

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs.

Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely
innocent, is NEVER a wash.

Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this.

On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely
innocent, is NEVER a wash.


Sure it is.

Nonsense.

Defending yourself in court is expensive and highly stressful.

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:49:00 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs.

Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely
innocent, is NEVER a wash.

Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this.

You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him
lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee
whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their
defense costs.

This really belongs in another thread, but I believe if it WERE true,
there would be a LOT less frivolous litigation.

Absolutely. Also, even when innocent and spending large amounts of money on your defense, there's still no guarantee that the verdict will come back in your favor. McDonald's coffee.