So why did Zimmerman......
 

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

So why did Zimmerman......
 

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

So why did Zimmerman......
 

In article , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs.

So why did Zimmerman......
 

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves?

You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded.

So why did Zimmerman......
 

In article 4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Yes, I did.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves?

No, I never said that.

You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

No, because I never said that.

In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded.

Ever hear of a public defender?

So why did Zimmerman......
 

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 10:57:32 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Yes, I did.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves?

No, I never said that.

You asked why he was raising money for a defense if he was innocent, implying that he shouldn't. "If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers?"

Because he wants to put up a vigorous defense, which you claim he is entitled to do.


You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

You clearly implied it. Now admit your whole posit was stupid, and move on.

So why did Zimmerman......
 

In article 14580661.2229.1334070975518.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynjc2, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 10:57:32 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Yes, I did.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves?

No, I never said that.

You asked why he was raising money for a defense if he was innocent, implying that he shouldn't. "If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers?"

Because he wants to put up a vigorous defense, which you claim he is entitled to do.


You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

You clearly implied it. Now admit your whole posit was stupid, and move on.

Far from it. I'm sure you don't understand though, because FOX hasn't
told you to.

So why did Zimmerman......
 

On 4/10/2012 2:07 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote:

In , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs.

Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely
innocent, is NEVER a wash.

And right now the guy has a hit out on him, it ain't cheap to hide,
'specially when you are hiding from a whole administration and
presidential campaign...

So why did Zimmerman......
 

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs.

Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely
innocent, is NEVER a wash.

Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this.

So why did Zimmerman......
 

In article , says...

On 4/10/2012 2:07 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote:

In , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs.

Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely
innocent, is NEVER a wash.

And right now the guy has a hit out on him, it ain't cheap to hide,
'specially when you are hiding from a whole administration and
presidential campaign...

You hide by starting up a for profit website????? And just WHO has this
"hit" on him?