|
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11/12 8:42 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/11/2012 8:34 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. If he's smart he'll hire Jose Bias the miracle worker. Who do you think is gonna' want to represent him, with a US Justice Dept sanctioned hit against Zimmerman out there? Remember, Zimmerman is wanted dead or alive and the most racist administration in history, is right there fanning the flames... Are you kidding? Criminal defense lawyers love to take on the government, federal, state, or local. Perhaps in your world of people of no accomplishment fear of the government is standard operating procedure. No criminal attorney worth his or her salt is intimidated by the Justice Department. And the Justice Department did not sanction a "hit " on Zimmerman. You're an ignorant, easily misled, psychotic asshole. Really. Get help. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11/12 8:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/11/2012 8:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article9770907.306.1334087405635.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynbv32, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:49:00 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this. You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their defense costs. This really belongs in another thread, but I believe if it WERE true, there would be a LOT less frivolous litigation. Absolutely. Also, even when innocent and spending large amounts of money on your defense, there's still no guarantee that the verdict will come back in your favor. McDonald's coffee. Especially after his lawyers quit because of his stupidness. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...yers-withdraw- trayvon-martin-case/2012/04/10/gIQA09XG9S_story.html Sure they did... snerk had nothing to do with the fact that anybody involved will be hunted the rest of their lives... LOL! You sure live in a strange little world, little toad man. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11/2012 8:48 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run... That's just plain stupid. Yup, that's what you guys do when caught lying...snerk |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11 And the Justice Department did not sanction a
"hit " on Zimmerman. Prove it. |
So why did Zimmerman......
In article , says...
On 4/11/2012 8:34 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. If he's smart he'll hire Jose Bias the miracle worker. Who do you think is gonna' want to represent him, with a US Justice Dept sanctioned hit against Zimmerman out there? Remember, Zimmerman is wanted dead or alive and the most racist administration in history, is right there fanning the flames... I'm guessing you have some evidence that the Justice Dept. has a "sanctioned hit against Zimmerman" right? Could you please post that? Now, I'm not talking about IF it is found to be a hate crime, that's different, they then would and should be involved. I'm going to guess that you can't post any evidence of your above bull****, right? |
So why did Zimmerman......
In article , says...
On 4/11/2012 8:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article9770907.306.1334087405635.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynbv32, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:49:00 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this. You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their defense costs. This really belongs in another thread, but I believe if it WERE true, there would be a LOT less frivolous litigation. Absolutely. Also, even when innocent and spending large amounts of money on your defense, there's still no guarantee that the verdict will come back in your favor. McDonald's coffee. Especially after his lawyers quit because of his stupidness. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...yers-withdraw- trayvon-martin-case/2012/04/10/gIQA09XG9S_story.html Sure they did... snerk had nothing to do with the fact that anybody involved will be hunted the rest of their lives... LOL! Uh, did you even read the reasons why they quit? |
So why did Zimmerman......
In article , says...
On 4/11/2012 8:48 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run... That's just plain stupid. Yup, that's what you guys do when caught lying...snerk Well then show us some cites for your wild allegations. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:42:12 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 4/11/2012 8:34 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. If he's smart he'll hire Jose Bias the miracle worker. Who do you think is gonna' want to represent him, with a US Justice Dept sanctioned hit against Zimmerman out there? Remember, Zimmerman is wanted dead or alive and the most racist administration in history, is right there fanning the flames... "US Justice Dept sanctioned hit" makes you look insane or stupid. Is Holder a member of the Black Panther Party too? |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11/12 1:11 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:42:12 -0400, wrote: On 4/11/2012 8:34 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. If he's smart he'll hire Jose Bias the miracle worker. Who do you think is gonna' want to represent him, with a US Justice Dept sanctioned hit against Zimmerman out there? Remember, Zimmerman is wanted dead or alive and the most racist administration in history, is right there fanning the flames... "US Justice Dept sanctioned hit" makes you look insane or stupid. He *is* both insane and stupid. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com