| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
So why did Zimmerman......
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? |
So why did Zimmerman......
|
So why did Zimmerman......
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. |
So why did Zimmerman......
|
So why did Zimmerman......
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 10:57:32 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You asked why he was raising money for a defense if he was innocent, implying that he shouldn't. "If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers?" Because he wants to put up a vigorous defense, which you claim he is entitled to do. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. You clearly implied it. Now admit your whole posit was stupid, and move on. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/10/2012 2:07 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. And right now the guy has a hit out on him, it ain't cheap to hide, 'specially when you are hiding from a whole administration and presidential campaign... |
So why did Zimmerman......
In article ,
says... On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this. |
So why did Zimmerman......
In article , says...
On 4/10/2012 2:07 PM, wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. And right now the guy has a hit out on him, it ain't cheap to hide, 'specially when you are hiding from a whole administration and presidential campaign... You hide by starting up a for profit website????? And just WHO has this "hit" on him? |
So why did Zimmerman......
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. Sure it is. Nonsense. Defending yourself in court is expensive and highly stressful. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:49:00 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this. You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their defense costs. This really belongs in another thread, but I believe if it WERE true, there would be a LOT less frivolous litigation. Absolutely. Also, even when innocent and spending large amounts of money on your defense, there's still no guarantee that the verdict will come back in your favor. McDonald's coffee. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:10:52 -0400, JustWait
wrote: On 4/10/2012 2:07 PM, wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. And right now the guy has a hit out on him, it ain't cheap to hide, 'specially when you are hiding from a whole administration and presidential campaign... Oh, wow, Hannity couldn't have said it better. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 10/04/2012 7:39 AM, SunshineStateJim wrote:
On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? They won't get paid if he doesn't get charged. -- Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay for it leave, they can all share having nothing. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 10/04/2012 8:17 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Unfortunately there are no good men. Zimmerman is a victim. -- Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay for it leave, they can all share having nothing. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. -- Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay for it leave, they can all share having nothing. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run... |
So why did Zimmerman......
|
So why did Zimmerman......
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:56:12 -0400, JustWait
wrote: On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run... You have to be the biggest conspiracy theorist in CT. Are you working with Hannity on this ****? |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 10/04/2012 7:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run... On a rent-a-cop salary I doubt he can afford the lawyers. And without charges, no money in it. Then the Black Panthers called them up, LE did nothing, so might as well quit to live another day. Watched a few videos on Black Panthers on YouTube, pretty obvious who the racists really are. On the bigger picture, looks like race riots for free TVs could erupt. -- Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay for it leave, they can all share having nothing. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/10/12 9:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run... You guess? Reads more like you are channeling that Faux News nutcase, Sean Hannity, or, even worse, Glen Beck. Does this craziness just pop into your head or are you on psychotropic drugs or what? You're pathetic. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11/2012 6:50 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/10/12 9:56 PM, JustWait wrote: On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run... You guess? Reads more like you are channeling that Faux News nutcase, Sean Hannity, or, even worse, Glen Beck. Does this craziness just pop into your head or are you on psychotropic drugs or what? You're pathetic. Lemme' see. You think it's ok to rape a little girl as young as ten years old and take her across state lines to hide the crime, and you are calling me pathetic? LOL! If you weren't such a disgusting old man, you would almost be funny... |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11/12 7:30 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/11/2012 6:50 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 4/10/12 9:56 PM, JustWait wrote: On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run... You guess? Reads more like you are channeling that Faux News nutcase, Sean Hannity, or, even worse, Glen Beck. Does this craziness just pop into your head or are you on psychotropic drugs or what? You're pathetic. Lemme' see. You think it's ok to rape a little girl as young as ten years old and take her across state lines to hide the crime, and you are calling me pathetic? LOL! If you weren't such a disgusting old man, you would almost be funny... Actually, ****-for-brains, I don't think what you are attributing to me is "ok." I think it is just another of your fantasies about me. I do believe, however, that even very young girls who are raped and find themselves pregnant should be allowed to terminate that pregnancy if *they* wish, and not have its continuation forced upon them by parents who are either bat**** crazy or overzealously religious. Further, if their parents refuse, they should be able to have a court-appointed public defender get a writ that allows the abortion. I don't believe a full-term pregnancy should be forced upon any female who doesn't want it. That's quite a bit different from what your pea-brain fantasizes, eh? |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/11/12 7:30 AM, JustWait wrote: On 4/11/2012 6:50 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 4/10/12 9:56 PM, JustWait wrote: On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run... You guess? Reads more like you are channeling that Faux News nutcase, Sean Hannity, or, even worse, Glen Beck. Does this craziness just pop into your head or are you on psychotropic drugs or what? You're pathetic. Lemme' see. You think it's ok to rape a little girl as young as ten years old and take her across state lines to hide the crime, and you are calling me pathetic? LOL! If you weren't such a disgusting old man, you would almost be funny... Actually, ****-for-brains, I don't thin That's quite a bit different from what your pea-brain fantasizes, eh? And quite different than what you said before... LOL!!! Sick puppy you are... |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11/12 8:25 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 4/11/12 7:30 AM, JustWait wrote: On 4/11/2012 6:50 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 4/10/12 9:56 PM, JustWait wrote: On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run... You guess? Reads more like you are channeling that Faux News nutcase, Sean Hannity, or, even worse, Glen Beck. Does this craziness just pop into your head or are you on psychotropic drugs or what? You're pathetic. Lemme' see. You think it's ok to rape a little girl as young as ten years old and take her across state lines to hide the crime, and you are calling me pathetic? LOL! If you weren't such a disgusting old man, you would almost be funny... Actually, ****-for-brains, I don't thin That's quite a bit different from what your pea-brain fantasizes, eh? And quite different than what you said before... LOL!!! Sick puppy you are... No, it isn't, ****-for-brains. You'll find no post in which *I* state what you claim. It's just more of your bat**** craziness. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. If he's smart he'll hire Jose Bias the miracle worker. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11/2012 8:34 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. If he's smart he'll hire Jose Bias the miracle worker. Who do you think is gonna' want to represent him, with a US Justice Dept sanctioned hit against Zimmerman out there? Remember, Zimmerman is wanted dead or alive and the most racist administration in history, is right there fanning the flames... |
So why did Zimmerman......
In article ,
says... On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this. You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their defense costs. But it is standard procedure. .. |
So why did Zimmerman......
In article 9770907.306.1334087405635.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynbv32, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:49:00 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this. You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their defense costs. This really belongs in another thread, but I believe if it WERE true, there would be a LOT less frivolous litigation. Absolutely. Also, even when innocent and spending large amounts of money on your defense, there's still no guarantee that the verdict will come back in your favor. McDonald's coffee. Especially after his lawyers quit because of his stupidness. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...yers-withdraw- trayvon-martin-case/2012/04/10/gIQA09XG9S_story.html |
So why did Zimmerman......
In article , says...
On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run... That's just plain stupid. Did you even understand the reasons they quit? The idiot Zimmerman actually pursued a meeting with the special prosecutor on his own. The lawyers hadn't heard from him in days, he actually talked to Hannity on his own without them knowing it and on and on. If Zimmerman goes on the run, he'll be a fugitive from justice. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11/12 8:42 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/11/2012 8:34 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. If he's smart he'll hire Jose Bias the miracle worker. Who do you think is gonna' want to represent him, with a US Justice Dept sanctioned hit against Zimmerman out there? Remember, Zimmerman is wanted dead or alive and the most racist administration in history, is right there fanning the flames... Are you kidding? Criminal defense lawyers love to take on the government, federal, state, or local. Perhaps in your world of people of no accomplishment fear of the government is standard operating procedure. No criminal attorney worth his or her salt is intimidated by the Justice Department. And the Justice Department did not sanction a "hit " on Zimmerman. You're an ignorant, easily misled, psychotic asshole. Really. Get help. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11/2012 8:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article9770907.306.1334087405635.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynbv32, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:49:00 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this. You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their defense costs. This really belongs in another thread, but I believe if it WERE true, there would be a LOT less frivolous litigation. Absolutely. Also, even when innocent and spending large amounts of money on your defense, there's still no guarantee that the verdict will come back in your favor. McDonald's coffee. Especially after his lawyers quit because of his stupidness. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...yers-withdraw- trayvon-martin-case/2012/04/10/gIQA09XG9S_story.html Sure they did... snerk had nothing to do with the fact that anybody involved will be hunted the rest of their lives... LOL! |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11/12 8:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/11/2012 8:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article9770907.306.1334087405635.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynbv32, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:49:00 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this. You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their defense costs. This really belongs in another thread, but I believe if it WERE true, there would be a LOT less frivolous litigation. Absolutely. Also, even when innocent and spending large amounts of money on your defense, there's still no guarantee that the verdict will come back in your favor. McDonald's coffee. Especially after his lawyers quit because of his stupidness. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...yers-withdraw- trayvon-martin-case/2012/04/10/gIQA09XG9S_story.html Sure they did... snerk had nothing to do with the fact that anybody involved will be hunted the rest of their lives... LOL! You sure live in a strange little world, little toad man. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11/2012 8:48 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run... That's just plain stupid. Yup, that's what you guys do when caught lying...snerk |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11 And the Justice Department did not sanction a
"hit " on Zimmerman. Prove it. |
So why did Zimmerman......
In article , says...
On 4/11/2012 8:34 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. If he's smart he'll hire Jose Bias the miracle worker. Who do you think is gonna' want to represent him, with a US Justice Dept sanctioned hit against Zimmerman out there? Remember, Zimmerman is wanted dead or alive and the most racist administration in history, is right there fanning the flames... I'm guessing you have some evidence that the Justice Dept. has a "sanctioned hit against Zimmerman" right? Could you please post that? Now, I'm not talking about IF it is found to be a hate crime, that's different, they then would and should be involved. I'm going to guess that you can't post any evidence of your above bull****, right? |
So why did Zimmerman......
In article , says...
On 4/11/2012 8:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article9770907.306.1334087405635.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynbv32, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:49:00 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this. You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their defense costs. This really belongs in another thread, but I believe if it WERE true, there would be a LOT less frivolous litigation. Absolutely. Also, even when innocent and spending large amounts of money on your defense, there's still no guarantee that the verdict will come back in your favor. McDonald's coffee. Especially after his lawyers quit because of his stupidness. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...yers-withdraw- trayvon-martin-case/2012/04/10/gIQA09XG9S_story.html Sure they did... snerk had nothing to do with the fact that anybody involved will be hunted the rest of their lives... LOL! Uh, did you even read the reasons why they quit? |
So why did Zimmerman......
In article , says...
On 4/11/2012 8:48 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run... That's just plain stupid. Yup, that's what you guys do when caught lying...snerk Well then show us some cites for your wild allegations. |
So why did Zimmerman......
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:42:12 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 4/11/2012 8:34 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. If he's smart he'll hire Jose Bias the miracle worker. Who do you think is gonna' want to represent him, with a US Justice Dept sanctioned hit against Zimmerman out there? Remember, Zimmerman is wanted dead or alive and the most racist administration in history, is right there fanning the flames... "US Justice Dept sanctioned hit" makes you look insane or stupid. Is Holder a member of the Black Panther Party too? |
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11/12 1:11 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:42:12 -0400, wrote: On 4/11/2012 8:34 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. No, because I never said that. In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded. Ever hear of a public defender? You don't get one until you are charged. If he's smart he'll hire Jose Bias the miracle worker. Who do you think is gonna' want to represent him, with a US Justice Dept sanctioned hit against Zimmerman out there? Remember, Zimmerman is wanted dead or alive and the most racist administration in history, is right there fanning the flames... "US Justice Dept sanctioned hit" makes you look insane or stupid. He *is* both insane and stupid. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:18 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com