On 10/04/2012 7:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his
defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?
So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend
themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.
Yes, I did.
Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend
themselves?
No, I never said that.
You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.
No, because I never said that.
In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty
are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily
railroaded.
Ever hear of a public defender?
You don't get one until you are charged.
His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from
Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther
terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like
Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run...
On a rent-a-cop salary I doubt he can afford the lawyers. And without
charges, no money in it. Then the Black Panthers called them up, LE did
nothing, so might as well quit to live another day.
Watched a few videos on Black Panthers on YouTube, pretty obvious who
the racists really are. On the bigger picture, looks like race riots
for free TVs could erupt.
--
Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and
other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay
for it leave, they can all share having nothing.