| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
So why did Zimmerman......
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:49:00 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this. You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their defense costs. This really belongs in another thread, but I believe if it WERE true, there would be a LOT less frivolous litigation. Absolutely. Also, even when innocent and spending large amounts of money on your defense, there's still no guarantee that the verdict will come back in your favor. McDonald's coffee. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
So why did Zimmerman......
|
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11/2012 8:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article9770907.306.1334087405635.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynbv32, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:49:00 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this. You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their defense costs. This really belongs in another thread, but I believe if it WERE true, there would be a LOT less frivolous litigation. Absolutely. Also, even when innocent and spending large amounts of money on your defense, there's still no guarantee that the verdict will come back in your favor. McDonald's coffee. Especially after his lawyers quit because of his stupidness. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...yers-withdraw- trayvon-martin-case/2012/04/10/gIQA09XG9S_story.html Sure they did... snerk had nothing to do with the fact that anybody involved will be hunted the rest of their lives... LOL! |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
So why did Zimmerman......
On 4/11/12 8:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/11/2012 8:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article9770907.306.1334087405635.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynbv32, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:49:00 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this. You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their defense costs. This really belongs in another thread, but I believe if it WERE true, there would be a LOT less frivolous litigation. Absolutely. Also, even when innocent and spending large amounts of money on your defense, there's still no guarantee that the verdict will come back in your favor. McDonald's coffee. Especially after his lawyers quit because of his stupidness. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...yers-withdraw- trayvon-martin-case/2012/04/10/gIQA09XG9S_story.html Sure they did... snerk had nothing to do with the fact that anybody involved will be hunted the rest of their lives... LOL! You sure live in a strange little world, little toad man. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
So why did Zimmerman......
In article , says...
On 4/11/2012 8:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article9770907.306.1334087405635.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynbv32, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:49:00 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? His lawyers want to be paid? If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs. Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely innocent, is NEVER a wash. Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this. You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their defense costs. This really belongs in another thread, but I believe if it WERE true, there would be a LOT less frivolous litigation. Absolutely. Also, even when innocent and spending large amounts of money on your defense, there's still no guarantee that the verdict will come back in your favor. McDonald's coffee. Especially after his lawyers quit because of his stupidness. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...yers-withdraw- trayvon-martin-case/2012/04/10/gIQA09XG9S_story.html Sure they did... snerk had nothing to do with the fact that anybody involved will be hunted the rest of their lives... LOL! Uh, did you even read the reasons why they quit? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Zimmerman not the one calling for help, experts say | General | |||
| Zimmerman has a political future with the GOP | General | |||
| More about the Zimmerman saga | General | |||
| Well, well, Zimmerman defenders..... | General | |||
| Here's Harry in his Zimmerman like lobster boat......... | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
