Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:49:44 -0700, thumper wrote:
On 4/2/2012 2:39 PM, BAR wrote: In , lid says... I didn't question that. Your original statement questioned why there would be a 2nd amendment at all if not for *self* defense. Explicit in the amendment itself is the answer... "a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state". It is there to ensure that the states can defend themselves and individuals can defend themselves. "*a* free state", clearly meaning the nation, and nothing whatsoever about self defense... I think we've exhausted the discussion. If you don't want to admit the obvious that's cool. ![]() By the way, I respect you for your stated opinion on Zimmerman's responsibilities. Why would a 'free state' mean the 'nation'? Surely the authors would have used the word 'nation' if that was there intent. States were in existence at the time. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
crazy tourists | General | |||
Avoid these compasses | ASA | |||
Tourists | ASA | |||
Marketing phrases to avoid.... | General | |||
Another example to avoid following: | General |