In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:05 AM, BAR wrote:
In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention
that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

It has already started he

http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html



We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious
attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ
from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have
Muslims here.

Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie.

What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind
and those with a political axe to grind.

Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy
just like that.

Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy?


What's the difference?

The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked
all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you
freak out.




Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down
and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic
'shrooms.

Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others.

As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of
history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by
christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under
discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history
of slaughter in the name of the faith.

Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow
lefty's action's belie your words.

I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another
superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its
practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular
society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian"
political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health
issues.

We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will.

Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see
right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old
woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest"
(http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is
that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument
falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms.

When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay
for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship,
she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country.

So... because she doesn't need birth control pills for reproductive
health means that no other woman needs it for that purpose as well?
Typical.

You are an idiot. I'll repeat it just to make sure it sinks in, you are
an idiot.

This has nothing to do with "reproductive health" whatever that means.
If birth control pills are not covered then they are not covered. If Ms.
Fluke wants birth control pills then she is free to purchase them
herself. No one is preventing her from purchasing birth control pills.

The question on the table is why can't Ms. Fluke pay for her own birth
control pills?

Birth control pills are not the only method of contraception if Ms.
Fluke doesn't want to get pregnant while engaging in her sexual
adventures.

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:01:20 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:05 AM, BAR wrote:
In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention
that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

It has already started he

http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html



We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious
attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ
from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have
Muslims here.

Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie.

What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind
and those with a political axe to grind.

Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy
just like that.

Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy?


What's the difference?

The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked
all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you
freak out.




Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down
and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic
'shrooms.

Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others.

As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of
history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by
christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under
discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history
of slaughter in the name of the faith.

Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow
lefty's action's belie your words.

I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another
superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its
practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular
society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian"
political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health
issues.

We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will.

Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see
right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old
woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest"
(http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is
that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument
falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms.

When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay
for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship,
she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country.

So... because she doesn't need birth control pills for reproductive
health means that no other woman needs it for that purpose as well?
Typical.

You are an idiot. I'll repeat it just to make sure it sinks in, you are
an idiot.

This has nothing to do with "reproductive health" whatever that means.
If birth control pills are not covered then they are not covered. If Ms.
Fluke wants birth control pills then she is free to purchase them
herself. No one is preventing her from purchasing birth control pills.

The question on the table is why can't Ms. Fluke pay for her own birth
control pills?

Birth control pills are not the only method of contraception if Ms.
Fluke doesn't want to get pregnant while engaging in her sexual
adventures.


Maybe that is why you don't get it! I'll make it simple. Reproductive
Health is a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all
matters relating to the reproductive system at all stages of life.

How did the human race get to the point where find ourselves today with
the help and guidance form the progressives over the last 100 years?

Ignorance, therefore, is believing that "birth control pills" are
prescribed only for birth control. Maybe perverts like Rush Limbaugh
should quit calling them birth control pills and merely call them
hormones which is what they really are. Maybe he could get over his
sex fascination.

Reproductive health?

Why take hormones? Doctors prescribe them to lower the risk of some
cancers, to treat some skin diseases, lessen the pain and stress of
periods, to relieve endometriosis, PCOS relief, and other good medical
reasons, not relating to sexual gyrations that I'm sure you'd like to
watch with Rush, in his Circle of Friends.

Birth control pills have been proved to cause breast cancer.

So what is all this fascination and anxiety associated with the
possibility that women are giving up a little that you aren't getting?
Slut means she putting out and YOU aren't getting any? Yep, thought
so.

Has your landlord let you out of the basement for any congegal visits
lately?

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:01:20 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:05 AM, BAR wrote:
In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention
that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

It has already started he

http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html



We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious
attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ
from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have
Muslims here.

Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie.

What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind
and those with a political axe to grind.

Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy
just like that.

Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy?


What's the difference?

The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked
all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you
freak out.




Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down
and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic
'shrooms.

Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others.

As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of
history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by
christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under
discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history
of slaughter in the name of the faith.

Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow
lefty's action's belie your words.

I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another
superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its
practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular
society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian"
political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health
issues.

We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will.

Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see
right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old
woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest"
(http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is
that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument
falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms.

When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay
for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship,
she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country.

So... because she doesn't need birth control pills for reproductive
health means that no other woman needs it for that purpose as well?
Typical.

You are an idiot. I'll repeat it just to make sure it sinks in, you are
an idiot.

This has nothing to do with "reproductive health" whatever that means.
If birth control pills are not covered then they are not covered. If Ms.
Fluke wants birth control pills then she is free to purchase them
herself. No one is preventing her from purchasing birth control pills.

The question on the table is why can't Ms. Fluke pay for her own birth
control pills?

Birth control pills are not the only method of contraception if Ms.
Fluke doesn't want to get pregnant while engaging in her sexual
adventures.


Maybe that is why you don't get it! I'll make it simple. Reproductive
Health is a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all
matters relating to the reproductive system at all stages of life.

How did the human race get to the point where find ourselves today with
the help and guidance form the progressives over the last 100 years?

Ignorance, therefore, is believing that "birth control pills" are
prescribed only for birth control. Maybe perverts like Rush Limbaugh
should quit calling them birth control pills and merely call them
hormones which is what they really are. Maybe he could get over his
sex fascination.

Reproductive health?

Why take hormones? Doctors prescribe them to lower the risk of some
cancers, to treat some skin diseases, lessen the pain and stress of
periods, to relieve endometriosis, PCOS relief, and other good medical
reasons, not relating to sexual gyrations that I'm sure you'd like to
watch with Rush, in his Circle of Friends.

Birth control pills have been proved to cause breast cancer.

So what is all this fascination and anxiety associated with the
possibility that women are giving up a little that you aren't getting?
Slut means she putting out and YOU aren't getting any? Yep, thought
so.

Has your landlord let you out of the basement for any congegal visits
lately?

Personal attacks, that should help clear up the great Christianity
debate!

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:01:20 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:05 AM, BAR wrote:
In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention
that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

It has already started he

http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html



We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious
attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ
from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have
Muslims here.

Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie.

What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind
and those with a political axe to grind.

Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy
just like that.

Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy?


What's the difference?

The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked
all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you
freak out.




Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down
and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic
'shrooms.

Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others.

As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of
history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by
christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under
discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history
of slaughter in the name of the faith.

Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow
lefty's action's belie your words.

I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another
superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its
practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular
society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian"
political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health
issues.

We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will.

Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see
right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old
woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest"
(http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is
that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument
falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms.

When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay
for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship,
she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country.

So... because she doesn't need birth control pills for reproductive
health means that no other woman needs it for that purpose as well?
Typical.

You are an idiot. I'll repeat it just to make sure it sinks in, you are
an idiot.

This has nothing to do with "reproductive health" whatever that means.
If birth control pills are not covered then they are not covered. If Ms.
Fluke wants birth control pills then she is free to purchase them
herself. No one is preventing her from purchasing birth control pills.

The question on the table is why can't Ms. Fluke pay for her own birth
control pills?

Birth control pills are not the only method of contraception if Ms.
Fluke doesn't want to get pregnant while engaging in her sexual
adventures.


Maybe that is why you don't get it! I'll make it simple. Reproductive
Health is a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all
matters relating to the reproductive system at all stages of life.

How did the human race get to the point where find ourselves today with
the help and guidance form the progressives over the last 100 years?

Ignorance, therefore, is believing that "birth control pills" are
prescribed only for birth control. Maybe perverts like Rush Limbaugh
should quit calling them birth control pills and merely call them
hormones which is what they really are. Maybe he could get over his
sex fascination.

Reproductive health?

Why take hormones? Doctors prescribe them to lower the risk of some
cancers, to treat some skin diseases, lessen the pain and stress of
periods, to relieve endometriosis, PCOS relief, and other good medical
reasons, not relating to sexual gyrations that I'm sure you'd like to
watch with Rush, in his Circle of Friends.

Birth control pills have been proved to cause breast cancer.

So what is all this fascination and anxiety associated with the
possibility that women are giving up a little that you aren't getting?
Slut means she putting out and YOU aren't getting any? Yep, thought
so.

Has your landlord let you out of the basement for any congegal visits
lately?

Personal attacks, that should help clear up the great Christianity
debate!

Who said I was a Christian?

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:01:20 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:05 AM, BAR wrote:
In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention
that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

It has already started he

http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html



We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious
attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ
from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have
Muslims here.

Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie.

What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind
and those with a political axe to grind.

Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy
just like that.

Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy?


What's the difference?

The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked
all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you
freak out.




Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down
and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic
'shrooms.

Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others.

As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of
history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by
christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under
discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history
of slaughter in the name of the faith.

Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow
lefty's action's belie your words.

I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another
superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its
practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular
society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian"
political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health
issues.

We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will.

Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see
right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old
woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest"
(http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is
that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument
falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms.

When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay
for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship,
she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country.

So... because she doesn't need birth control pills for reproductive
health means that no other woman needs it for that purpose as well?
Typical.

You are an idiot. I'll repeat it just to make sure it sinks in, you are
an idiot.

This has nothing to do with "reproductive health" whatever that means.
If birth control pills are not covered then they are not covered. If Ms.
Fluke wants birth control pills then she is free to purchase them
herself. No one is preventing her from purchasing birth control pills.

The question on the table is why can't Ms. Fluke pay for her own birth
control pills?

Birth control pills are not the only method of contraception if Ms.
Fluke doesn't want to get pregnant while engaging in her sexual
adventures.


Maybe that is why you don't get it! I'll make it simple. Reproductive
Health is a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all
matters relating to the reproductive system at all stages of life.

How did the human race get to the point where find ourselves today with
the help and guidance form the progressives over the last 100 years?

Ignorance, therefore, is believing that "birth control pills" are
prescribed only for birth control. Maybe perverts like Rush Limbaugh
should quit calling them birth control pills and merely call them
hormones which is what they really are. Maybe he could get over his
sex fascination.

Reproductive health?

Why take hormones? Doctors prescribe them to lower the risk of some
cancers, to treat some skin diseases, lessen the pain and stress of
periods, to relieve endometriosis, PCOS relief, and other good medical
reasons, not relating to sexual gyrations that I'm sure you'd like to
watch with Rush, in his Circle of Friends.

Birth control pills have been proved to cause breast cancer.

So what is all this fascination and anxiety associated with the
possibility that women are giving up a little that you aren't getting?
Slut means she putting out and YOU aren't getting any? Yep, thought
so.

Has your landlord let you out of the basement for any congegal visits
lately?

Personal attacks, that should help clear up the great Christianity
debate!

Who said I was a Christian?

I don't know. Who, and what does it have to do with my statement that
personal attacks should help clear up the great Christianity debate?

On 3/4/12 9:51 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:01:20 -0500, wrote:

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:05 AM, BAR wrote:
In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention
that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

It has already started he

http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html



We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious
attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ
from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have
Muslims here.

Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie.

What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind
and those with a political axe to grind.

Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy
just like that.

Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy?


What's the difference?

The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked
all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you
freak out.




Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down
and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic
'shrooms.

Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others.

As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of
history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by
christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under
discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history
of slaughter in the name of the faith.

Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow
lefty's action's belie your words.

I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another
superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its
practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular
society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian"
political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health
issues.

We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will.

Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see
right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old
woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest"
(http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is
that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument
falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms.

When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay
for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship,
she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country.

So... because she doesn't need birth control pills for reproductive
health means that no other woman needs it for that purpose as well?
Typical.

You are an idiot. I'll repeat it just to make sure it sinks in, you are
an idiot.

This has nothing to do with "reproductive health" whatever that means.
If birth control pills are not covered then they are not covered. If Ms.
Fluke wants birth control pills then she is free to purchase them
herself. No one is preventing her from purchasing birth control pills.

The question on the table is why can't Ms. Fluke pay for her own birth
control pills?

Birth control pills are not the only method of contraception if Ms.
Fluke doesn't want to get pregnant while engaging in her sexual
adventures.


Maybe that is why you don't get it! I'll make it simple. Reproductive
Health is a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all
matters relating to the reproductive system at all stages of life.

How did the human race get to the point where find ourselves today with
the help and guidance form the progressives over the last 100 years?

Ignorance, therefore, is believing that "birth control pills" are
prescribed only for birth control. Maybe perverts like Rush Limbaugh
should quit calling them birth control pills and merely call them
hormones which is what they really are. Maybe he could get over his
sex fascination.

Reproductive health?

Why take hormones? Doctors prescribe them to lower the risk of some
cancers, to treat some skin diseases, lessen the pain and stress of
periods, to relieve endometriosis, PCOS relief, and other good medical
reasons, not relating to sexual gyrations that I'm sure you'd like to
watch with Rush, in his Circle of Friends.

Birth control pills have been proved to cause breast cancer.

So what is all this fascination and anxiety associated with the
possibility that women are giving up a little that you aren't getting?
Slut means she putting out and YOU aren't getting any? Yep, thought
so.

Has your landlord let you out of the basement for any congegal visits
lately?

Personal attacks, that should help clear up the great Christianity
debate!

Who said I was a Christian?




I believe you once claimed you were Catholic, but I believe what you are
saying...you are in fact the antithesis of a person who follows the
teachings of Jesus.

In article ,
says...

On 3/4/12 9:51 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:01:20 -0500, wrote:

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:05 AM, BAR wrote:
In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention
that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

It has already started he

http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html



We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious
attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ
from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have
Muslims here.

Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie.

What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind
and those with a political axe to grind.

Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy
just like that.

Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy?


What's the difference?

The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked
all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you
freak out.




Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down
and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic
'shrooms.

Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others.

As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of
history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by
christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under
discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history
of slaughter in the name of the faith.

Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow
lefty's action's belie your words.

I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another
superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its
practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular
society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian"
political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health
issues.

We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will.

Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see
right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old
woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest"
(http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is
that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument
falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms.

When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay
for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship,
she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country.

So... because she doesn't need birth control pills for reproductive
health means that no other woman needs it for that purpose as well?
Typical.

You are an idiot. I'll repeat it just to make sure it sinks in, you are
an idiot.

This has nothing to do with "reproductive health" whatever that means.
If birth control pills are not covered then they are not covered. If Ms.
Fluke wants birth control pills then she is free to purchase them
herself. No one is preventing her from purchasing birth control pills.

The question on the table is why can't Ms. Fluke pay for her own birth
control pills?

Birth control pills are not the only method of contraception if Ms.
Fluke doesn't want to get pregnant while engaging in her sexual
adventures.


Maybe that is why you don't get it! I'll make it simple. Reproductive
Health is a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all
matters relating to the reproductive system at all stages of life.

How did the human race get to the point where find ourselves today with
the help and guidance form the progressives over the last 100 years?

Ignorance, therefore, is believing that "birth control pills" are
prescribed only for birth control. Maybe perverts like Rush Limbaugh
should quit calling them birth control pills and merely call them
hormones which is what they really are. Maybe he could get over his
sex fascination.

Reproductive health?

Why take hormones? Doctors prescribe them to lower the risk of some
cancers, to treat some skin diseases, lessen the pain and stress of
periods, to relieve endometriosis, PCOS relief, and other good medical
reasons, not relating to sexual gyrations that I'm sure you'd like to
watch with Rush, in his Circle of Friends.

Birth control pills have been proved to cause breast cancer.

So what is all this fascination and anxiety associated with the
possibility that women are giving up a little that you aren't getting?
Slut means she putting out and YOU aren't getting any? Yep, thought
so.

Has your landlord let you out of the basement for any congegal visits
lately?

Personal attacks, that should help clear up the great Christianity
debate!

Who said I was a Christian?




I believe you once claimed you were Catholic, but I believe what you are
saying...you are in fact the antithesis of a person who follows the
teachings of Jesus.

I am a Deist.

On 3/4/12 1:53 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:01:20 -0500, wrote:

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:05 AM, BAR wrote:
In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention
that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

It has already started he

http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html



We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious
attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ
from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have
Muslims here.

Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie.

What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind
and those with a political axe to grind.

Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy
just like that.

Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy?


What's the difference?

The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked
all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you
freak out.




Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down
and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic
'shrooms.

Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others.

As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of
history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by
christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under
discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history
of slaughter in the name of the faith.

Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow
lefty's action's belie your words.

I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another
superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its
practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular
society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian"
political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health
issues.

We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will.

Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see
right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old
woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest"
(http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is
that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument
falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms.

When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay
for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship,
she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country.

So... because she doesn't need birth control pills for reproductive
health means that no other woman needs it for that purpose as well?
Typical.

You are an idiot. I'll repeat it just to make sure it sinks in, you are
an idiot.

This has nothing to do with "reproductive health" whatever that means.
If birth control pills are not covered then they are not covered. If Ms.
Fluke wants birth control pills then she is free to purchase them
herself. No one is preventing her from purchasing birth control pills.

The question on the table is why can't Ms. Fluke pay for her own birth
control pills?

Birth control pills are not the only method of contraception if Ms.
Fluke doesn't want to get pregnant while engaging in her sexual
adventures.


The following sponsors: Sleep Train, ProFlowers, Quicken Loans, Sleep
Number, Legal Zoom, Citrix Systems Inc., the NBA Cleveland Cavaliers,
and more, are dumping Limbaugh and his big, greasy, racist,
misogynist, right-wingnut, mouth.

Wonder why?


Limbaugh the pig's half-assed "apology" was almost hilarious. I'm so
happy the GOP has such a stellar character as its intellectual and moral
opinion maker.

I wonder who the GOP'ers are going to offend next.

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:01:20 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:05 AM, BAR wrote:
In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention
that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

It has already started he

http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html



We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious
attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ
from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have
Muslims here.

Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie.

What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind
and those with a political axe to grind.

Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy
just like that.

Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy?


What's the difference?

The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked
all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you
freak out.




Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down
and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic
'shrooms.

Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others.

As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of
history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by
christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under
discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history
of slaughter in the name of the faith.

Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow
lefty's action's belie your words.

I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another
superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its
practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular
society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian"
political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health
issues.

We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will.

Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see
right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old
woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest"
(http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is
that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument
falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms.

When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay
for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship,
she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country.

So... because she doesn't need birth control pills for reproductive
health means that no other woman needs it for that purpose as well?
Typical.

You are an idiot. I'll repeat it just to make sure it sinks in, you are
an idiot.

This has nothing to do with "reproductive health" whatever that means.
If birth control pills are not covered then they are not covered. If Ms.
Fluke wants birth control pills then she is free to purchase them
herself. No one is preventing her from purchasing birth control pills.

The question on the table is why can't Ms. Fluke pay for her own birth
control pills?

Birth control pills are not the only method of contraception if Ms.
Fluke doesn't want to get pregnant while engaging in her sexual
adventures.


The following sponsors: Sleep Train, ProFlowers, Quicken Loans, Sleep
Number, Legal Zoom, Citrix Systems Inc., the NBA Cleveland Cavaliers,
and more, are dumping Limbaugh and his big, greasy, racist,
misogynist, right-wingnut, mouth.

Wonder why?

I don't care why they are "dumping" him.