| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her testimony. Lights out. Good night. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article , dump-on-
says... On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote: In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her testimony. Lights out. Good night. http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politic...etterhead-2nd% 20hearing.pdf "When I look around my campus, I see the faces of the women affected, and I have heard more and more of their stories. . On a daily basis, I hear from yet another woman from Georgetown or other schools or who works for a religiously affiliated employer who has suffered financial, emotional, and medical burdens because of this lack of contraceptive coverage. And so, I am here to share their voices and I thank you for allowing them to be heard." "Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that?s practically an entire summer?s salary. Forty percent of female students at Georgetown Law report struggling financially as a result of this policy. One told us of how embarrassed and powerless she felt when she was standing at the pharmacy counter, learning for the first time that contraception wasn?t covered, and had to walk away because she couldn?t afford it. Women like her have no choice but to go without contraception. Just last week, a married female student told me she had to stop using contraception because she couldn?t afford it any longer. Women employed in low wage jobs without contraceptive coverage face the same choice." Ms. Fluke needs to understand that her employer or school is not responsible for the cost of her birth control pills. Nor is that employer responsible for the cost of condoms. If she doesn't want to get pregnant she can stopping ****ing guys and start studying. It is her choice and she should be responsible for paying for her choices. If Ms. Fluke doesn't like the policies of Georgetown University than she is free to attend another school. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/12 10:47 AM, BAR wrote:
In article0cOdnXcYyP1yqc_SnZ2dnUVZ_qadnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote: In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her testimony. Lights out. Good night. http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politic...etterhead-2nd% 20hearing.pdf "When I look around my campus, I see the faces of the women affected, and I have heard more and more of their stories. . On a daily basis, I hear from yet another woman from Georgetown or other schools or who works for a religiously affiliated employer who has suffered financial, emotional, and medical burdens because of this lack of contraceptive coverage. And so, I am here to share their voices and I thank you for allowing them to be heard." "Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that?s practically an entire summer?s salary. Forty percent of female students at Georgetown Law report struggling financially as a result of this policy. One told us of how embarrassed and powerless she felt when she was standing at the pharmacy counter, learning for the first time that contraception wasn?t covered, and had to walk away because she couldn?t afford it. Women like her have no choice but to go without contraception. Just last week, a married female student told me she had to stop using contraception because she couldn?t afford it any longer. Women employed in low wage jobs without contraceptive coverage face the same choice." Ms. Fluke needs to understand that her employer or school is not responsible for the cost of her birth control pills. Nor is that employer responsible for the cost of condoms. If she doesn't want to get pregnant she can stopping ****ing guys and start studying. It is her choice and she should be responsible for paying for her choices. If Ms. Fluke doesn't like the policies of Georgetown University than she is free to attend another school. Her insurer is responsible. Don't like it? Move to a religious state. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article , dump-on-
says... On 3/3/12 10:47 AM, BAR wrote: In article0cOdnXcYyP1yqc_SnZ2dnUVZ_qadnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote: In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her testimony. Lights out. Good night. http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politic...etterhead-2nd% 20hearing.pdf "When I look around my campus, I see the faces of the women affected, and I have heard more and more of their stories. . On a daily basis, I hear from yet another woman from Georgetown or other schools or who works for a religiously affiliated employer who has suffered financial, emotional, and medical burdens because of this lack of contraceptive coverage. And so, I am here to share their voices and I thank you for allowing them to be heard." "Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that?s practically an entire summer?s salary. Forty percent of female students at Georgetown Law report struggling financially as a result of this policy. One told us of how embarrassed and powerless she felt when she was standing at the pharmacy counter, learning for the first time that contraception wasn?t covered, and had to walk away because she couldn?t afford it. Women like her have no choice but to go without contraception. Just last week, a married female student told me she had to stop using contraception because she couldn?t afford it any longer. Women employed in low wage jobs without contraceptive coverage face the same choice." Ms. Fluke needs to understand that her employer or school is not responsible for the cost of her birth control pills. Nor is that employer responsible for the cost of condoms. If she doesn't want to get pregnant she can stopping ****ing guys and start studying. It is her choice and she should be responsible for paying for her choices. If Ms. Fluke doesn't like the policies of Georgetown University than she is free to attend another school. Her insurer is responsible. Don't like it? Move to a religious state. The insurer is responsible for what is in the policy. Most, if not all, Catholic institutions choose to not have birth control pills covered by their health insurance policies. If you don't like it then you don't have to work for a Catholic institution or attend school at a Catholic institution. Remember it is a choice. Ms. Fluke can always choose to go to another school. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/2012 5:58 PM, BAR wrote:
In , dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 10:47 AM, BAR wrote: In article0cOdnXcYyP1yqc_SnZ2dnUVZ_qadnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote: In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her testimony. Lights out. Good night. http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politic...etterhead-2nd% 20hearing.pdf "When I look around my campus, I see the faces of the women affected, and I have heard more and more of their stories. . On a daily basis, I hear from yet another woman from Georgetown or other schools or who works for a religiously affiliated employer who has suffered financial, emotional, and medical burdens because of this lack of contraceptive coverage. And so, I am here to share their voices and I thank you for allowing them to be heard." "Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that?s practically an entire summer?s salary. Forty percent of female students at Georgetown Law report struggling financially as a result of this policy. One told us of how embarrassed and powerless she felt when she was standing at the pharmacy counter, learning for the first time that contraception wasn?t covered, and had to walk away because she couldn?t afford it. Women like her have no choice but to go without contraception. Just last week, a married female student told me she had to stop using contraception because she couldn?t afford it any longer. Women employed in low wage jobs without contraceptive coverage face the same choice." Ms. Fluke needs to understand that her employer or school is not responsible for the cost of her birth control pills. Nor is that employer responsible for the cost of condoms. If she doesn't want to get pregnant she can stopping ****ing guys and start studying. It is her choice and she should be responsible for paying for her choices. If Ms. Fluke doesn't like the policies of Georgetown University than she is free to attend another school. Her insurer is responsible. Don't like it? Move to a religious state. The insurer is responsible for what is in the policy. Most, if not all, Catholic institutions choose to not have birth control pills covered by their health insurance policies. If you don't like it then you don't have to work for a Catholic institution or attend school at a Catholic institution. Remember it is a choice. Ms. Fluke can always choose to go to another school. The big lie here is the idea that the insurance companies won't charge the group of policy holders for the added services... Like they are just gonna' give it to them. If they know they are going to have to cover more thihgs, they will charge the group more across the board to cover the extra expense... Again, that's what insurance companies do... |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:12:47 -0500, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote: In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her testimony. Lights out. Good night. Her testimony was recorded. She wanted $3000 for birth control pills. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/12 1:16 PM, Happy John wrote:
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:12:47 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote: In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her testimony. Lights out. Good night. Her testimony was recorded. She wanted $3000 for birth control pills. I'm hoping the young lady who Limbaugh slandered big time will initiate a massive lawsuit against him. She is a private citizen and Limbaugh the Pig will not be able to hide behind a claim that she was a public figure when she testified before Congress. The woman should have all the help she needs from her faculty and fellow students at Georgetown Law. I'm also pleased to read that at least a handful of Limbaugh the Pig's advertisers have decided to part ways with him. There's no real civil penalty in most cases for insulting a public figure on the airways. There are for what Limbaugh the Pig did. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:31:28 -0500, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/3/12 1:16 PM, Happy John wrote: On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:12:47 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote: In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her testimony. Lights out. Good night. Her testimony was recorded. She wanted $3000 for birth control pills. I'm hoping the young lady who Limbaugh slandered big time will initiate a massive lawsuit against him. She is a private citizen and Limbaugh the Pig will not be able to hide behind a claim that she was a public figure when she testified before Congress. The woman should have all the help she needs from her faculty and fellow students at Georgetown Law. I'm also pleased to read that at least a handful of Limbaugh the Pig's advertisers have decided to part ways with him. There's no real civil penalty in most cases for insulting a public figure on the airways. There are for what Limbaugh the Pig did. Harry, you keep describing yourself to a 't'. You've proven you can't keep a lid on yourself. I've noticed you've disregarded the questions that are pertinent. Adios. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article ,
says... On 3/3/12 1:16 PM, Happy John wrote: On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:12:47 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote: In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her testimony. Lights out. Good night. Her testimony was recorded. She wanted $3000 for birth control pills. I'm hoping the young lady who Limbaugh slandered big time will initiate a massive lawsuit against him. She is a private citizen and Limbaugh the Pig will not be able to hide behind a claim that she was a public figure when she testified before Congress. The woman should have all the help she needs from her faculty and fellow students at Georgetown Law. I'm also pleased to read that at least a handful of Limbaugh the Pig's advertisers have decided to part ways with him. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/sand...ake-victim-of- georgetowns-policy-on-contraceptives/ Looks like Ms. Fluke went looking for a fight and she got what she wanted. There's no real civil penalty in most cases for insulting a public figure on the airways. There are for what Limbaugh the Pig did. With the knowledge that she was looking for a fight there she has no reasonable expectation of privacy. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Whoa - this is scary... | General | |||
| Scary | General | |||
| Scary Scary Scary!!!!! | ASA | |||
| OT Bush is getting scary. | General | |||
![BAR[_2_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Hybrid Mode
