On 3/3/12 9:03 AM, BAR wrote:
In b.com,
says...

On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 08:20:04 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:
On 3/3/12 8:15 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,

says...

On 3/2/12 9:14 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 8:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 8:31 PM, Happy John wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:20:22 -0500, X `
wrote:

On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no
intention that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty
scary.


http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

I had no idea what CBN was until your comment. Is the article
I posted
political? I think not. Is
this political:
http://www.cbn.com/finance/calculato...geSavings.aspx
I think not.

I don't think every article in the Washington Post or the NY
Times is
political either. Why do you
imply that the source of news makes the news 'political'?


CBN is nothing but right-wing political. Period.

Do you think the events shown on the video are not real because
of the
source?


Are you asking me if they've been..."Breitbarted..." ? On CBN?
The odds
are pretty good they have. CBN, after all, is Pat Robertson's
scam
broadcasting operation.

When was the 1st amendment repealed?




The question, mr. undereducated, was whether the scammy pat
robertson
christian broadcasting network had credibility, not whether it
could
broadcast the crap it does. Go back to school and learn how to read
for
content.

I see Harry is back in his personal attack and insult mode. He
doesn't seem to have any self restraint

Harry is too easy.


Harry thinks that you don't understand what you read and therefore often
jump in with an "argument" that has nothing to do with the subject under
discussion.