Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseasprofits
On 11/3/11 4:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:53:59 -0400, wrote: It's not that simple. A lot of Fortune 500 companies are multi-nationals meaning that they do business internationally and generate profits in different countries/currencies. If they repatriate that money back to the US they get hit with double taxation, first where they earned it, and again here when they bring it back. A lot of them would like to bring profits back but not at the cost of double taxation. Beardsley's corporate apologetica continues. Wayne made an intelligent assumption and you made a fool of yourself, AGAIN. Way to go WAFA. ========= Proving once again that you can't educate those who already know everything, or those who don't know what they don't know. :-) The only thing that you've proven in all your corporationist posts, Beardsley, is that no matter what excesses corporations commit, you'll favor them. |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseas profits
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:10:04 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: On 11/3/11 4:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:53:59 -0400, wrote: It's not that simple. A lot of Fortune 500 companies are multi-nationals meaning that they do business internationally and generate profits in different countries/currencies. If they repatriate that money back to the US they get hit with double taxation, first where they earned it, and again here when they bring it back. A lot of them would like to bring profits back but not at the cost of double taxation. Beardsley's corporate apologetica continues. Wayne made an intelligent assumption and you made a fool of yourself, AGAIN. Way to go WAFA. ========= Proving once again that you can't educate those who already know everything, or those who don't know what they don't know. :-) The only thing that you've proven in all your corporationist posts, Beardsley, is that no matter what excesses corporations commit, you'll favor them. ======== Usually when I run into someone with attitudes similar to yours it turns out that they were never able to get, or hold, a job with a corporation. Frequently the reason is related to personality, skills (lack thereof) or work ethic. I'd guess that in your case it's a personality issue. Hopefully Ms. Greer will be willing to keep you on a while longer as CEO job at Harry Krause & Associates. That would be the pits getting fired from your own company. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseasprofits
On 11/3/11 5:50 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:10:04 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 11/3/11 4:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:53:59 -0400, wrote: It's not that simple. A lot of Fortune 500 companies are multi-nationals meaning that they do business internationally and generate profits in different countries/currencies. If they repatriate that money back to the US they get hit with double taxation, first where they earned it, and again here when they bring it back. A lot of them would like to bring profits back but not at the cost of double taxation. Beardsley's corporate apologetica continues. Wayne made an intelligent assumption and you made a fool of yourself, AGAIN. Way to go WAFA. ========= Proving once again that you can't educate those who already know everything, or those who don't know what they don't know. :-) The only thing that you've proven in all your corporationist posts, Beardsley, is that no matter what excesses corporations commit, you'll favor them. ======== Usually when I run into someone with attitudes similar to yours it turns out that they were never able to get, or hold, a job with a corporation. Frequently the reason is related to personality, skills (lack thereof) or work ethic. I'd guess that in your case it's a personality issue. Hopefully Ms. Greer will be willing to keep you on a while longer as CEO job at Harry Krause& Associates. That would be the pits getting fired from your own company. Oh, Beardsley,...give it up. I'm simply not a fan of the sort of corporate abuse that has been perpetrated on this country since the 1980's. I've worked for corporations, and I still have as clients several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades. In fact, I just finished a draft of a speech one of my clients will be presenting and will get paid in the five figures for it. You seem to be "stuck" on a Florida corporation that hasn't been active for well over a decade. That's your problem, not mine. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseasprofits
On 11/3/2011 5:59 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/3/11 5:50 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:10:04 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 11/3/11 4:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:53:59 -0400, wrote: It's not that simple. A lot of Fortune 500 companies are multi-nationals meaning that they do business internationally and generate profits in different countries/currencies. If they repatriate that money back to the US they get hit with double taxation, first where they earned it, and again here when they bring it back. A lot of them would like to bring profits back but not at the cost of double taxation. Beardsley's corporate apologetica continues. Wayne made an intelligent assumption and you made a fool of yourself, AGAIN. Way to go WAFA. ========= Proving once again that you can't educate those who already know everything, or those who don't know what they don't know. :-) The only thing that you've proven in all your corporationist posts, Beardsley, is that no matter what excesses corporations commit, you'll favor them. ======== Usually when I run into someone with attitudes similar to yours it turns out that they were never able to get, or hold, a job with a corporation. Frequently the reason is related to personality, skills (lack thereof) or work ethic. I'd guess that in your case it's a personality issue. Hopefully Ms. Greer will be willing to keep you on a while longer as CEO job at Harry Krause& Associates. That would be the pits getting fired from your own company. Oh, Beardsley,...give it up. I'm simply not a fan of the sort of corporate abuse that has been perpetrated on this country since the 1980's. I've worked for corporations, and I still have as clients several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades. In fact, I just finished a draft of a speech one of my clients will be presenting and will get paid in the five figures for it. You seem to be "stuck" on a Florida corporation that hasn't been active for well over a decade. That's your problem, not mine. There you go Mr. Pufferfish. You've puffed yourself way up for that little skirmish. Careful; you might explode. -- 1-20-13 The end of an error |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseas profits
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: I still have as clients several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades. ======== You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of hypocrisy don't you think? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The shame of it all. Who can you trust these days? |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseasprofits
On 11/3/11 6:38 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man wrote: I still have as clients several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades. ======== You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of hypocrisy don't you think? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The shame of it all. Who can you trust these days? Certainly not a corporate apologist like you. |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseas profits
In article ,
says... On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man wrote: I still have as clients several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades. ======== You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of hypocrisy don't you think? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The shame of it all. Who can you trust these days? I take it that Harry's little consulting business is a not for profit..... |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseas profits
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 08:57:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man wrote: I still have as clients several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades. ======== You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of hypocrisy don't you think? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The shame of it all. Who can you trust these days? I take it that Harry's little consulting business is a not for profit..... ====== If so it is no doubt unintentional. Most people with out of state corporations are trying to hide something, either taxable revenue or assets. I originally assumed revenue but it might be assets. That could explain why the house is in his wife's name also. |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseasprofits
On 11/4/11 11:21 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 08:57:31 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man wrote: I still have as clients several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades. ======== You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of hypocrisy don't you think? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The shame of it all. Who can you trust these days? I take it that Harry's little consulting business is a not for profit..... ====== If so it is no doubt unintentional. Most people with out of state corporations are trying to hide something, either taxable revenue or assets. I originally assumed revenue but it might be assets. That could explain why the house is in his wife's name also. You obviously need an "I'm an Asshole Obsessed with Harry" membership card. Maybe I'll send you one, Beardsley. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
When will the leftists understand they need to pay their taxes? | General | |||
Who doesn't pay taxes and why | General | |||
I will pay more in federal income taxes this year than ExxonMobil | General | |||
Only proles pay taxes | General | |||
Only Little People pay taxes, Democrats do NOT. | General |