Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseas profits
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:53:59 -0400, Drifter wrote:
It's not that simple. A lot of Fortune 500 companies are multi-nationals meaning that they do business internationally and generate profits in different countries/currencies. If they repatriate that money back to the US they get hit with double taxation, first where they earned it, and again here when they bring it back. A lot of them would like to bring profits back but not at the cost of double taxation. Beardsley's corporate apologetica continues. Wayne made an intelligent assumption and you made a fool of yourself, AGAIN. Way to go WAFA. ========= Proving once again that you can't educate those who already know everything, or those who don't know what they don't know. :-) |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseasprofits
On 11/3/11 4:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:53:59 -0400, wrote: It's not that simple. A lot of Fortune 500 companies are multi-nationals meaning that they do business internationally and generate profits in different countries/currencies. If they repatriate that money back to the US they get hit with double taxation, first where they earned it, and again here when they bring it back. A lot of them would like to bring profits back but not at the cost of double taxation. Beardsley's corporate apologetica continues. Wayne made an intelligent assumption and you made a fool of yourself, AGAIN. Way to go WAFA. ========= Proving once again that you can't educate those who already know everything, or those who don't know what they don't know. :-) The only thing that you've proven in all your corporationist posts, Beardsley, is that no matter what excesses corporations commit, you'll favor them. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseas profits
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:10:04 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: On 11/3/11 4:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:53:59 -0400, wrote: It's not that simple. A lot of Fortune 500 companies are multi-nationals meaning that they do business internationally and generate profits in different countries/currencies. If they repatriate that money back to the US they get hit with double taxation, first where they earned it, and again here when they bring it back. A lot of them would like to bring profits back but not at the cost of double taxation. Beardsley's corporate apologetica continues. Wayne made an intelligent assumption and you made a fool of yourself, AGAIN. Way to go WAFA. ========= Proving once again that you can't educate those who already know everything, or those who don't know what they don't know. :-) The only thing that you've proven in all your corporationist posts, Beardsley, is that no matter what excesses corporations commit, you'll favor them. ======== Usually when I run into someone with attitudes similar to yours it turns out that they were never able to get, or hold, a job with a corporation. Frequently the reason is related to personality, skills (lack thereof) or work ethic. I'd guess that in your case it's a personality issue. Hopefully Ms. Greer will be willing to keep you on a while longer as CEO job at Harry Krause & Associates. That would be the pits getting fired from your own company. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseasprofits
On 11/3/11 5:50 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:10:04 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 11/3/11 4:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:53:59 -0400, wrote: It's not that simple. A lot of Fortune 500 companies are multi-nationals meaning that they do business internationally and generate profits in different countries/currencies. If they repatriate that money back to the US they get hit with double taxation, first where they earned it, and again here when they bring it back. A lot of them would like to bring profits back but not at the cost of double taxation. Beardsley's corporate apologetica continues. Wayne made an intelligent assumption and you made a fool of yourself, AGAIN. Way to go WAFA. ========= Proving once again that you can't educate those who already know everything, or those who don't know what they don't know. :-) The only thing that you've proven in all your corporationist posts, Beardsley, is that no matter what excesses corporations commit, you'll favor them. ======== Usually when I run into someone with attitudes similar to yours it turns out that they were never able to get, or hold, a job with a corporation. Frequently the reason is related to personality, skills (lack thereof) or work ethic. I'd guess that in your case it's a personality issue. Hopefully Ms. Greer will be willing to keep you on a while longer as CEO job at Harry Krause& Associates. That would be the pits getting fired from your own company. Oh, Beardsley,...give it up. I'm simply not a fan of the sort of corporate abuse that has been perpetrated on this country since the 1980's. I've worked for corporations, and I still have as clients several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades. In fact, I just finished a draft of a speech one of my clients will be presenting and will get paid in the five figures for it. You seem to be "stuck" on a Florida corporation that hasn't been active for well over a decade. That's your problem, not mine. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseasprofits
On 11/3/2011 5:59 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/3/11 5:50 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:10:04 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 11/3/11 4:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:53:59 -0400, wrote: It's not that simple. A lot of Fortune 500 companies are multi-nationals meaning that they do business internationally and generate profits in different countries/currencies. If they repatriate that money back to the US they get hit with double taxation, first where they earned it, and again here when they bring it back. A lot of them would like to bring profits back but not at the cost of double taxation. Beardsley's corporate apologetica continues. Wayne made an intelligent assumption and you made a fool of yourself, AGAIN. Way to go WAFA. ========= Proving once again that you can't educate those who already know everything, or those who don't know what they don't know. :-) The only thing that you've proven in all your corporationist posts, Beardsley, is that no matter what excesses corporations commit, you'll favor them. ======== Usually when I run into someone with attitudes similar to yours it turns out that they were never able to get, or hold, a job with a corporation. Frequently the reason is related to personality, skills (lack thereof) or work ethic. I'd guess that in your case it's a personality issue. Hopefully Ms. Greer will be willing to keep you on a while longer as CEO job at Harry Krause& Associates. That would be the pits getting fired from your own company. Oh, Beardsley,...give it up. I'm simply not a fan of the sort of corporate abuse that has been perpetrated on this country since the 1980's. I've worked for corporations, and I still have as clients several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades. In fact, I just finished a draft of a speech one of my clients will be presenting and will get paid in the five figures for it. You seem to be "stuck" on a Florida corporation that hasn't been active for well over a decade. That's your problem, not mine. There you go Mr. Pufferfish. You've puffed yourself way up for that little skirmish. Careful; you might explode. -- 1-20-13 The end of an error |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseas profits
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: I still have as clients several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades. ======== You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of hypocrisy don't you think? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The shame of it all. Who can you trust these days? |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseasprofits
On 11/3/11 6:38 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man wrote: I still have as clients several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades. ======== You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of hypocrisy don't you think? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The shame of it all. Who can you trust these days? Certainly not a corporate apologist like you. |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseas profits
In article ,
says... On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man wrote: I still have as clients several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades. ======== You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of hypocrisy don't you think? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The shame of it all. Who can you trust these days? I take it that Harry's little consulting business is a not for profit..... |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Many companies pay less in US taxes than they do on overseas profits
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 08:57:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man wrote: I still have as clients several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades. ======== You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of hypocrisy don't you think? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The shame of it all. Who can you trust these days? I take it that Harry's little consulting business is a not for profit..... ====== If so it is no doubt unintentional. Most people with out of state corporations are trying to hide something, either taxable revenue or assets. I originally assumed revenue but it might be assets. That could explain why the house is in his wife's name also. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
When will the leftists understand they need to pay their taxes? | General | |||
Who doesn't pay taxes and why | General | |||
I will pay more in federal income taxes this year than ExxonMobil | General | |||
Only proles pay taxes | General | |||
Only Little People pay taxes, Democrats do NOT. | General |