On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....

It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting
anybody do anything about our jobs problems.

Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh
turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day
for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh?

Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very
recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if
Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't
help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil.

You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick
with that. There must be something you know.

On 10/26/2011 1:16 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to
talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the
get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....

It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting
anybody do anything about our jobs problems.

Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh
turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day
for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh?

Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very
recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if
Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't
help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil.

You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick
with that. There must be something you know.

as usual your whole dissertation is based on a false premise... My
statement was that the oil is for France and Germany... always the liar
this Krause guy...

On 10/26/11 1:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 1:16 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to
talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the
get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....

It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting
anybody do anything about our jobs problems.

Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh
turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day
for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh?

Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very
recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if
Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't
help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil.

You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick
with that. There must be something you know.

as usual your whole dissertation is based on a false premise... My
statement was that the oil is for France and Germany... always the liar
this Krause guy...



Your theory is that the French and Germans are going to invade Libya and
take it over? A rebirth of the Foreign Legion in North Africa and the
Afrika Corps? Where's Rommel?

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:16:35 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....

It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting
anybody do anything about our jobs problems.

Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh
turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day
for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh?

Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very
recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if
Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't
help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil.

You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick
with that. There must be something you know.

He knows how to live off his wife's industry, work on motorcycles with
Chinese tools and camp.

On 10/26/11 2:07 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:16:35 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....

It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting
anybody do anything about our jobs problems.

Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh
turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day
for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh?

Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very
recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if
Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't
help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil.

You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick
with that. There must be something you know.

He knows how to live off his wife's industry, work on motorcycles with
Chinese tools and camp.


I thought his wife was the "brains" behind the internet reselling company.

On 10/26/11 11:40 AM, JustWait wrote:
The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....


"Save our military..."

What the hell are you raving about now, moron?

Save it for what? Another invasion of another country that didn't attack
us on 9-11?

The military should be cut down incrementally to no more than half of
what it is now...and then looked at again to see if it can be cut down
some more.

For a non-consequential, unemployable little ****, you sure have some
wild and wooly opinions.

On 26/10/2011 9:40 AM, JustWait wrote:
The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....

Destroy the military? DC already spends more than the other 25 top
nations in the world combined!!! As if USA is at war with the entire
world. Fact is the military is more than 5 times the size that is needed.

Good place to save serious is to hack $500 billion from the $800 billion
military budget.

No setup, fact is USA no longer pays its bills with real money and
Monopoly Bernanke can't keep printing 0bama's debt spend forver.
Zimbawe tried that, and now a $100 trillion note is toilet paper.
Germany, Argentina, all who tried the money print ended up the same way,
even the Roman Empire going to tin coin replacing silver and gold.

Fact is DC is broke and overspending. 50% of what DC spends is
debt-money-print spend.

Do you or your your wife continuously spend twice as much as comes in?
It eventually leads to assured bankruptcy.

Too big to fail? Tell that to the countries that have tried this
before. Including the Roman Empire. Fact is USA is gong to see third
world status as the banking and currency system no longer have any
integrity. Once Europe has crashed, USA will not be far behind.
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.