Trying to pick a candidate from the current field of Republican
candidates is exactly like deciding which STD would be just right for me.

On 15/10/2011 8:14 PM, X ` Man wrote:
Trying to pick a candidate from the current field of Republican
candidates is exactly like deciding which STD would be just right for me.

Sure beats 0bama, that would be life putting a double barrel shotgun to
your head and pulling both triggers at once when it is loaded with solid
shells and the trigger is wired to a grenade.

But agree, asides from Bachman, not looking good. But too many women
haters in all parties... And Romney as well as Perry, just more old
boys bull****.

Not looking good. Sort of like asking,how do you want to be served?
Fried or baked?

--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But
we have big huge government we can't afford...
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude

On 10/15/11 10:31 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 15/10/2011 8:14 PM, X ` Man wrote:
Trying to pick a candidate from the current field of Republican
candidates is exactly like deciding which STD would be just right for me.

Sure beats 0bama, that would be life putting a double barrel shotgun to
your head and pulling both triggers at once when it is loaded with solid
shells and the trigger is wired to a grenade.

But agree, asides from Bachman, not looking good. But too many women
haters in all parties... And Romney as well as Perry, just more old boys
bull****.

Not looking good. Sort of like asking,how do you want to be served?
Fried or baked?



My guess is the disdain for Michele Bachmann has virtually nothing to do
with her gender. Bachmann is a ditz, an intellectual cipher. She had a
brief bubble of support because of her fake Christianity and wildly
right-wing ideas, but even the GOP party faithful came to realize there
was nothing of substance between her ears. And that husband of hers,
with the bought and paid for "psychology degrees" from the mail order
mills and no license to practice...that spells trouble, right there in
river city, and that's trouble with a T.

On 16/10/2011 4:33 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/15/11 10:31 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 15/10/2011 8:14 PM, X ` Man wrote:
Trying to pick a candidate from the current field of Republican
candidates is exactly like deciding which STD would be just right for
me.

Sure beats 0bama, that would be life putting a double barrel shotgun to
your head and pulling both triggers at once when it is loaded with solid
shells and the trigger is wired to a grenade.

But agree, asides from Bachman, not looking good. But too many women
haters in all parties... And Romney as well as Perry, just more old boys
bull****.

Not looking good. Sort of like asking,how do you want to be served?
Fried or baked?



My guess is the disdain for Michele Bachmann has virtually nothing to do
with her gender. Bachmann is a ditz, an intellectual cipher. She had a
brief bubble of support because of her fake Christianity and wildly
right-wing ideas, but even the GOP party faithful came to realize there
was nothing of substance between her ears. And that husband of hers,
with the bought and paid for "psychology degrees" from the mail order
mills and no license to practice...that spells trouble, right there in
river city, and that's trouble with a T.

Funny, if you don't like Bachmann's superior behavior, how come you like
liar 0bama (zero-bama). After all, 0bama be a bout big mouth, $t
trillion more in debt and no results. Fact is 0bama can't fix the
economy because it is fleabagger bull**** and fraud from people like him
that caused their depression.

But we all know the truth, you dislike women. You have a fear or
politically strong women.
--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But
we have big huge government we can't afford...
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude

On 10/16/11 6:30 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 16/10/2011 4:33 AM, X ` Man wrote:

My guess is the disdain for Michele Bachmann has virtually nothing to do
with her gender. Bachmann is a ditz, an intellectual cipher. She had a
brief bubble of support because of her fake Christianity and wildly
right-wing ideas, but even the GOP party faithful came to realize there
was nothing of substance between her ears. And that husband of hers,
with the bought and paid for "psychology degrees" from the mail order
mills and no license to practice...that spells trouble, right there in
river city, and that's trouble with a T.

Funny, if you don't like Bachmann's superior behavior, how come you like
liar 0bama (zero-bama). After all, 0bama be a bout big mouth, $t
trillion more in debt and no results. Fact is 0bama can't fix the
economy because it is fleabagger bull**** and fraud from people like him
that caused their depression.

But we all know the truth, you dislike women. You have a fear or
politically strong women.

Bachmann's "superior" behavior? What the hell does that mean? And
neither Bachmann nor your other ditzy heroine, Palin, are politically
strong women.

My first choice for president in the 2008 elections was Mrs. Clinton,
who is smarter, more capable, and stronger than the entire cast of
third-raters seeking the GOP nomination this year. I'm also a big fan of
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the Congresswoman for Florida's 20th
congressional district. She's also Chairwoman of the Democratic National
Committee. She also is smarter, stronger and more capable than Bachmann
or Palin.

On 16/10/2011 4:41 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/16/11 6:30 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 16/10/2011 4:33 AM, X ` Man wrote:

My guess is the disdain for Michele Bachmann has virtually nothing to do
with her gender. Bachmann is a ditz, an intellectual cipher. She had a
brief bubble of support because of her fake Christianity and wildly
right-wing ideas, but even the GOP party faithful came to realize there
was nothing of substance between her ears. And that husband of hers,
with the bought and paid for "psychology degrees" from the mail order
mills and no license to practice...that spells trouble, right there in
river city, and that's trouble with a T.

Funny, if you don't like Bachmann's superior behavior, how come you like
liar 0bama (zero-bama). After all, 0bama be a bout big mouth, $t
trillion more in debt and no results. Fact is 0bama can't fix the
economy because it is fleabagger bull**** and fraud from people like him
that caused their depression.

But we all know the truth, you dislike women. You have a fear or
politically strong women.

Bachmann's "superior" behavior? What the hell does that mean? And
neither Bachmann nor your other ditzy heroine, Palin, are politically
strong women.

Bachmann isn't promising to mortgage your grand kids futures with
debt-tax slavery. Relatively morally up standing compared to 0bomba.

But your a fleabaggger, you vote on greed not morals.

My first choice for president in the 2008 elections was Mrs. Clinton,
who is smarter, more capable, and stronger than the entire cast of
third-raters seeking the GOP nomination this year. I'm also a big fan of
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the Congresswoman for Florida's 20th
congressional district. She's also Chairwoman of the Democratic National
Committee. She also is smarter, stronger and more capable than Bachmann
or Palin.

Doubtful Hilary would be good at all, look at her husband and the moral
issues "I did not have sexual relations" ....blow job... husband of
hers. But then, like I say fleabaggers don't vote with morality or
integrity in mind.

--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But
we have big huge government we can't afford...
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude

On 15/10/2011 8:14 PM, X ` Man wrote:

Trying to pick a candidate from the current field of Republican
candidates is exactly like deciding which STD would be just right for me.

A new thought just occurred. An STD might be better than a bullet in
the head.

Politics is about choosing the least evil. They are all evil. But are
you a selfish ******* or an American? Are you voting on personal greed
of social assistance or on America's future?

--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

On 11/6/2011 6:24 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 15/10/2011 8:14 PM, X ` Man wrote:

Trying to pick a candidate from the current field of Republican
candidates is exactly like deciding which STD would be just right for me.

A new thought just occurred. An STD might be better than a bullet in the
head.

Politics is about choosing the least evil. They are all evil. But are
you a selfish ******* or an American? Are you voting on personal greed
of social assistance or on America's future?

Social Assistance is best applied to Global Business if the numbers are
the yardstick.
Social Assistance for Americans will become real really soon. Most
unemployed have no money coming in so welfare will increase even if or
especially if they take minimum wage jobs when available.
SS and Medicare are not social assistance or welfare. At any rate Global
Business has no room to bitch as the bulk of takes are paid by those
that receive a paycheck.
The Tea Party was unmasked with Wisconsin or even before. It is not
about America. It is about the so called one percent and reducing their
taxation even more and taxing Americans even more and furthering the
divide of the 1% and everybody else.
There are over 44 million Americans out of work, or underemployed and
they seek to keep ginning the same old agenda, of exporting America's
Production and jobs, or the real tax base, and reducing domestic labor
costs. Thus we have a flood of Illegal Aliens and Aliens. They hold
seminars and classes for Mexicans, in Virginia while Americans try to
plan for no income.

On 06/11/2011 5:02 PM, Lil Abner wrote:
On 11/6/2011 6:24 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 15/10/2011 8:14 PM, X ` Man wrote:

Trying to pick a candidate from the current field of Republican
candidates is exactly like deciding which STD would be just right for
me.

A new thought just occurred. An STD might be better than a bullet in the
head.

Politics is about choosing the least evil. They are all evil. But are
you a selfish ******* or an American? Are you voting on personal greed
of social assistance or on America's future?

Social Assistance is best applied to Global Business if the numbers are
the yardstick.
Social Assistance for Americans will become real really soon. Most
unemployed have no money coming in so welfare will increase even if or
especially if they take minimum wage jobs when available.

Loosing some business to this depression I sympathies. But the job
losses are the symptoms, not the cause of the depression. That is
government policy on debt, currency mismanagement, debt-tax slavery and
statism are the causes.

Other than voting for fleabaggerism, I in no way hold middle class
workers at fault here. Fact is the government is taking too much of the
pie for a stable economy. Inflation from money print devalues wages and
decreases physical consumption. And less consumption means less jobs.
Less jobs means lower income tax revenues and government, how dare they
become smaller in their egalitarian academic buffoonery of statism, so
they print even more money making the very problem worse.

SS and Medicare are not social assistance or welfare. At any rate Global
Business has no room to bitch as the bulk of takes are paid by those
that receive a paycheck.

Yep. And people did get bigger raises in the last 30 years if you vew
the employment taxes as art of he wages. Just that employment taxes
went up faster absorbing the raises. Tax predation on net incomes is
higher now than ever.

The Tea Party was unmasked with Wisconsin or even before. It is not
about America. It is about the so called one percent and reducing their
taxation even more and taxing Americans even more and furthering the
divide of the 1% and everybody else.

This is stupid government propelled bull****. If you took the entire
net worth of the 1% and applied it to deficit spending, I don't mean
taxes, I mean everything they own, you would still have a deficit at the
end of the year with less revenue for the next.

Sort of like being penny wise and pound foolish. Or like stealing a
penny when you need a buck.

There are over 44 million Americans out of work, or underemployed and
they seek to keep ginning the same old agenda, of exporting America's
Production and jobs, or the real tax base, and reducing domestic labor
costs. Thus we have a flood of Illegal Aliens and Aliens. They hold
seminars and classes for Mexicans, in Virginia while Americans try to
plan for no income.

Agreed, I do believe the real numbers are higher than government says it
is. Sad so many get screwed and the ass holes at the top go along like
nothing matters. If you had a decent president, he would say we are
broke, everyone making more than $30K/year si getting a 40% wage roll
back, to equalize us with main stream society. If you politicians and
chair mushrooms want better, then do better for all of America. Less
glass house egalitarian bull**** from the government idiots.

Fact us 74% of the Whitehouse staff got at least 9% wage increase last
year. Yep, let the country eat inflation, unemployment and taxes.

Yep, leave it to government to be insanely stupid. We in Canada do the
same, we lose jobs, so we let in twice as many "cheap" immigrant labor
to kill competitive pressures for wages. So the next job comes at
minimum wage with a boss telling you that you are lucky to have a job
and better put up with my bull****. Lots of crap jobs.

Sometimes I wonder if they do this as the civil service can spend a lot
of time and money keeping busy with welfare, retraining, lawyers and
courts. Plus keeps us taxpayers as debt-tax slaves to pay for it.

Just an insane byzantine mess. Clearly our governments need to be cut
in half or less.
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

On 11/6/2011 10:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 06/11/2011 5:02 PM, Lil Abner wrote:
On 11/6/2011 6:24 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 15/10/2011 8:14 PM, X ` Man wrote:

Trying to pick a candidate from the current field of Republican
candidates is exactly like deciding which STD would be just right for
me.

A new thought just occurred. An STD might be better than a bullet in the
head.

Politics is about choosing the least evil. They are all evil. But are
you a selfish ******* or an American? Are you voting on personal greed
of social assistance or on America's future?

Social Assistance is best applied to Global Business if the numbers are
the yardstick.
Social Assistance for Americans will become real really soon. Most
unemployed have no money coming in so welfare will increase even if or
especially if they take minimum wage jobs when available.

Loosing some business to this depression I sympathies. But the job
losses are the symptoms, not the cause of the depression. That is
government policy on debt, currency mismanagement, debt-tax slavery and
statism are the causes.

Other than voting for fleabaggerism, I in no way hold middle class
workers at fault here. Fact is the government is taking too much of the
pie for a stable economy. Inflation from money print devalues wages and
decreases physical consumption. And less consumption means less jobs.
Less jobs means lower income tax revenues and government, how dare they
become smaller in their egalitarian academic buffoonery of statism, so
they print even more money making the very problem worse.

SS and Medicare are not social assistance or welfare. At any rate Global
Business has no room to bitch as the bulk of takes are paid by those
that receive a paycheck.

Yep. And people did get bigger raises in the last 30 years if you vew
the employment taxes as art of he wages. Just that employment taxes went
up faster absorbing the raises. Tax predation on net incomes is higher
now than ever.

The Tea Party was unmasked with Wisconsin or even before. It is not
about America. It is about the so called one percent and reducing their
taxation even more and taxing Americans even more and furthering the
divide of the 1% and everybody else.

This is stupid government propelled bull****. If you took the entire net
worth of the 1% and applied it to deficit spending, I don't mean taxes,
I mean everything they own, you would still have a deficit at the end of
the year with less revenue for the next.

Sort of like being penny wise and pound foolish. Or like stealing a
penny when you need a buck.

There are over 44 million Americans out of work, or underemployed and
they seek to keep ginning the same old agenda, of exporting America's
Production and jobs, or the real tax base, and reducing domestic labor
costs. Thus we have a flood of Illegal Aliens and Aliens. They hold
seminars and classes for Mexicans, in Virginia while Americans try to
plan for no income.

Agreed, I do believe the real numbers are higher than government says it
is. Sad so many get screwed and the ass holes at the top go along like
nothing matters. If you had a decent president, he would say we are
broke, everyone making more than $30K/year si getting a 40% wage roll
back, to equalize us with main stream society. If you politicians and
chair mushrooms want better, then do better for all of America. Less
glass house egalitarian bull**** from the government idiots.

Fact us 74% of the Whitehouse staff got at least 9% wage increase last
year. Yep, let the country eat inflation, unemployment and taxes.

Yep, leave it to government to be insanely stupid. We in Canada do the
same, we lose jobs, so we let in twice as many "cheap" immigrant labor
to kill competitive pressures for wages. So the next job comes at
minimum wage with a boss telling you that you are lucky to have a job
and better put up with my bull****. Lots of crap jobs.

Sometimes I wonder if they do this as the civil service can spend a lot
of time and money keeping busy with welfare, retraining, lawyers and
courts. Plus keeps us taxpayers as debt-tax slaves to pay for it.

Just an insane byzantine mess. Clearly our governments need to be cut in
half or less.
It is not about taking anyone's wealth. It is about the Tea Party et al
seeking to further their tax advantages.