On 10/4/2011 12:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 21:45:16 -0400, X ` wrote:

On 10/3/11 9:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 20:01:47 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:19:24 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote:

The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have
laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of
those cases when they finally come to trial.

That is not American soil, it is in Cuba, precisely why we put them
there. This is not an embassy. Gitmo is a particularly ambiguous
place. Legally it is simply leased from Castro, just like a base in
Japan, Germany or Turkey. We actually send them a check every year
that they refuse to cash.
We can even say we are following the laws of Cuba since locking up
political prisoners there is the normal thing to do.
Obama must see the convenient irony too since he has done nothing to
change the situation.

It was a poor attempt to subvert the American Justice system, in
particular the FISA court. A needless criminal act, which carries
ramifications to this day.


It was actually somewhat legal, particularly if they call them POWs.
That all gets back to whether this is actually a war.
If it isn't a war, why are we bombing people?
Would it be better if we just murdered these people anonymously, like
the Israelis? Perhaps.
I don't think we have much to show from the $3 trillion we spent doing
it with massive force.

Ahh, but POW rights were not extended. Oh, and we have nothing to show
for the trillions of dollars we are wasting on Iraq and Afghanistan, and
the American men and women who are killed or seriously wounded over there.

Add Libya to that. And then ask yourself why you voted for the asshole spending the bucks over
there, both in treasure and blood.

Because he wants France to have oil...

On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:40:36 -0400, X ` Man wrote:

On 10/4/11 12:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 21:45:16 -0400, X ` wrote:

On 10/3/11 9:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 20:01:47 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:19:24 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote:

The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have
laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of
those cases when they finally come to trial.

That is not American soil, it is in Cuba, precisely why we put them
there. This is not an embassy. Gitmo is a particularly ambiguous
place. Legally it is simply leased from Castro, just like a base in
Japan, Germany or Turkey. We actually send them a check every year
that they refuse to cash.
We can even say we are following the laws of Cuba since locking up
political prisoners there is the normal thing to do.
Obama must see the convenient irony too since he has done nothing to
change the situation.

It was a poor attempt to subvert the American Justice system, in
particular the FISA court. A needless criminal act, which carries
ramifications to this day.


It was actually somewhat legal, particularly if they call them POWs.
That all gets back to whether this is actually a war.
If it isn't a war, why are we bombing people?
Would it be better if we just murdered these people anonymously, like
the Israelis? Perhaps.
I don't think we have much to show from the $3 trillion we spent doing
it with massive force.

Ahh, but POW rights were not extended. Oh, and we have nothing to show
for the trillions of dollars we are wasting on Iraq and Afghanistan, and
the American men and women who are killed or seriously wounded over there.

Add Libya to that. And then ask yourself why you voted for the asshole spending the bucks over
there, both in treasure and blood.


You are asking me why I didn't vote for Senile McCain and Bat**** Crazy
Palin? snerk

No, I'm asking why on the one hand you praise your messiah, but on the other hand you condemn many
of his actions.

See you next month. You're still very funny.

On 10/4/11 1:01 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:40:36 -0400, X ` wrote:

On 10/4/11 12:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 21:45:16 -0400, X ` wrote:

On 10/3/11 9:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 20:01:47 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:19:24 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote:

The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have
laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of
those cases when they finally come to trial.

That is not American soil, it is in Cuba, precisely why we put them
there. This is not an embassy. Gitmo is a particularly ambiguous
place. Legally it is simply leased from Castro, just like a base in
Japan, Germany or Turkey. We actually send them a check every year
that they refuse to cash.
We can even say we are following the laws of Cuba since locking up
political prisoners there is the normal thing to do.
Obama must see the convenient irony too since he has done nothing to
change the situation.

It was a poor attempt to subvert the American Justice system, in
particular the FISA court. A needless criminal act, which carries
ramifications to this day.


It was actually somewhat legal, particularly if they call them POWs.
That all gets back to whether this is actually a war.
If it isn't a war, why are we bombing people?
Would it be better if we just murdered these people anonymously, like
the Israelis? Perhaps.
I don't think we have much to show from the $3 trillion we spent doing
it with massive force.

Ahh, but POW rights were not extended. Oh, and we have nothing to show
for the trillions of dollars we are wasting on Iraq and Afghanistan, and
the American men and women who are killed or seriously wounded over there.

Add Libya to that. And then ask yourself why you voted for the asshole spending the bucks over
there, both in treasure and blood.


You are asking me why I didn't vote for Senile McCain and Bat**** Crazy
Palin?snerk

No, I'm asking why on the one hand you praise your messiah, but on the other hand you condemn many
of his actions.

See you next month. You're still very funny.


There's no requirement I be in total sync with any politician for whom I
vote. I've stated before I have some issues with Obama, but there's not
significant enough to make me consider voting for any of the bat****
crazy Republicans.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

On 10/4/2011 1:01 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:40:36 -0400, X ` wrote:

On 10/4/11 12:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 21:45:16 -0400, X ` wrote:

On 10/3/11 9:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 20:01:47 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:19:24 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote:

The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have
laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of
those cases when they finally come to trial.

That is not American soil, it is in Cuba, precisely why we put them
there. This is not an embassy. Gitmo is a particularly ambiguous
place. Legally it is simply leased from Castro, just like a base in
Japan, Germany or Turkey. We actually send them a check every year
that they refuse to cash.
We can even say we are following the laws of Cuba since locking up
political prisoners there is the normal thing to do.
Obama must see the convenient irony too since he has done nothing to
change the situation.

It was a poor attempt to subvert the American Justice system, in
particular the FISA court. A needless criminal act, which carries
ramifications to this day.


It was actually somewhat legal, particularly if they call them POWs.
That all gets back to whether this is actually a war.
If it isn't a war, why are we bombing people?
Would it be better if we just murdered these people anonymously, like
the Israelis? Perhaps.
I don't think we have much to show from the $3 trillion we spent doing
it with massive force.

Ahh, but POW rights were not extended. Oh, and we have nothing to show
for the trillions of dollars we are wasting on Iraq and Afghanistan, and
the American men and women who are killed or seriously wounded over there.

Add Libya to that. And then ask yourself why you voted for the asshole spending the bucks over
there, both in treasure and blood.


You are asking me why I didn't vote for Senile McCain and Bat**** Crazy
Palin?snerk

No, I'm asking why on the one hand you praise your messiah, but on the other hand you condemn many
of his actions.

See you next month. You're still very funny.

Funny as in Ha Ha or funny as in odd?

On 10/4/2011 1:03 PM, X ` Man wrote:

There's no requirement I be in total sync with any politician for whom I
vote. I've stated before I have some issues with Obama, but there's not
significant enough to make me consider voting for any of the bat****
crazy Republicans.


That taint good gramma. Just sayin.

On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:08:04 -0400, Drifter wrote:

On 10/4/2011 1:03 PM, X ` Man wrote:

There's no requirement I be in total sync with any politician for whom I
vote. I've stated before I have some issues with Obama, but there's not
significant enough to make me consider voting for any of the bat****
crazy Republicans.


That taint good gramma. Just sayin.

I think 'bat**** crazy' should be hyphenated. Ya know? Or he's missin' a comma. One or 'tother.

On 10/4/11 1:20 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:08:04 -0400, wrote:

On 10/4/2011 1:03 PM, X ` Man wrote:

There's no requirement I be in total sync with any politician for whom I
vote. I've stated before I have some issues with Obama, but there's not
significant enough to make me consider voting for any of the bat****
crazy Republicans.


That taint good gramma. Just sayin.

I think 'bat**** crazy' should be hyphenated. Ya know? Or he's missin' a comma. One or 'tother.


It's nice to see the piglets scooping up the droppings.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

In article ,
says...

On 10/4/11 1:20 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:08:04 -0400, wrote:

On 10/4/2011 1:03 PM, X ` Man wrote:

There's no requirement I be in total sync with any politician for whom I
vote. I've stated before I have some issues with Obama, but there's not
significant enough to make me consider voting for any of the bat****
crazy Republicans.


That taint good gramma. Just sayin.

I think 'bat**** crazy' should be hyphenated. Ya know? Or he's missin' a comma. One or 'tother.


It's nice to see the piglets scooping up the droppings.

Gee, Harry, you sure seem quick to criticize somebody's writing, but you
sure don't like it when it happens to you, eh?

On 10/4/2011 1:24 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/4/11 1:20 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:08:04 -0400, wrote:

On 10/4/2011 1:03 PM, X ` Man wrote:

There's no requirement I be in total sync with any politician for
whom I
vote. I've stated before I have some issues with Obama, but there's not
significant enough to make me consider voting for any of the bat****
crazy Republicans.


That taint good gramma. Just sayin.

I think 'bat**** crazy' should be hyphenated. Ya know? Or he's missin'
a comma. One or 'tother.


It's nice to see the piglets scooping up the droppings.


Piglets at your house? Congratulations. You never told us that you guys
were in a family way. That shows you really do know how to keep a secret.

On 10/4/2011 1:33 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/4/11 1:20 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:08:04 -0400, wrote:

On 10/4/2011 1:03 PM, X ` Man wrote:

There's no requirement I be in total sync with any politician for whom I
vote. I've stated before I have some issues with Obama, but there's not
significant enough to make me consider voting for any of the bat****
crazy Republicans.


That taint good gramma. Just sayin.

I think 'bat**** crazy' should be hyphenated. Ya know? Or he's missin' a comma. One or 'tother.


It's nice to see the piglets scooping up the droppings.

Gee, Harry, you sure seem quick to criticize somebody's writing, but you
sure don't like it when it happens to you, eh?

It's just one of those tit for tat things.