On 10/6/2011 12:14 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In articlef5314b9f-5adc-4369-a039-
,
says...

On Oct 6, 3:14 am, wrote:
On 10/5/2011 5:48 PM, BAR wrote:





In , says...

On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote:
On Oct 5, 8:58 am, wrote:
In ,
says...

On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:

On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait

wrote:
On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John
wrote:

On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John
wrote:

Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama
administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo.

No, it doesn't.

al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13
years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and
then released because they were guilty of nothing.

Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the
wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus
information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was
coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically.

Guilty based on what?

And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember?

More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong.

I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also
didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo.
I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than
arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist
hideout.
These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple
drivers and whomever else was in the cars.

Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As
to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided
to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it...

I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how
we feel..

I have no problem with Gitmo...

The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have
laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of
those cases when they finally come to trial.

I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping
ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong
time, too.

I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using
the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them.

Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'?

How silly.

Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some
arrogant dumb****s think so.

If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in
effect?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did the
deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back
unless you agree not to execute him.

And that is stupid. Just liberal judges fu-king the process. All we
should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a similar law to
what we have, and get a fair trial? If so, deportation should be immediate.

I don't understand why Canada and France want to harbor murderers, ok
alledged murderer.

Pfffttt. Canada sends out invitations to terrorists Oh, and they sell
a lot of pot here in the us, cause they are just such upstanding
*nieghbors*..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What the *ell is a "nieghbors"??

Suckling Don, are you really so stupid that you can't understand it even
though there is a typo?

....he is...

On 10/6/11 7:27 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/6/2011 2:18 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/6/2011 1:04 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/6/11 12:57 PM, North Star wrote:
On Oct 6, 1:15 pm, wrote:
In aweb.com,
says...







On 10/6/2011 10:35 AM, North Star wrote:
On Oct 6, 3:14 am, wrote:
On 10/5/2011 5:48 PM, BAR wrote:

In ,
says...

On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote:
On Oct 5, 8:58 am, wrote:
In ,

says...

On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400,
wrote:

On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT),
"JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:

On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait

wrote:
On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John

wrote:

On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400,
wrote:

On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John

wrote:

Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified,
but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama
administration and liberals who cried about the
terrorists in Guantanamo.

No, it doesn't.

al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people
as young as 13
years old, which were detained for a ridiculous
amount of time and
then released because they were guilty of nothing.

Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people
that were in the
wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons
of bogus
information was obtained. Few of them really guilty
got what was
coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally
and politically.

Guilty based on what?

And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember?

More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong.

I really don't have a problem with killing these guys
but I also
didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo.
I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any
different than
arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected
terrorist
hideout.
These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed
a couple
drivers and whomever else was in the cars.

Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US
I guess... As
to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at
war, and decided
to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it...

I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people
if that is how
we feel..

I have no problem with Gitmo...

The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We
either have
laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised
all of
those cases when they finally come to trial.

I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a
dumping
ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place
at the wrong
time, too.

I have no problem with holding perps and defending America,
but using
the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them.

Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't
'American'?

How silly.

Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am
sure some
arrogant dumb****s think so.

If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws
are in
effect?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did
the
deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him
back
unless you agree not to execute him.

And that is stupid. Just liberal judges fu-king the process.
All we
should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a
similar law to
what we have, and get a fair trial? If so, deportation should be
immediate.

I don't understand why Canada and France want to harbor
murderers, ok
alledged murderer.

Pfffttt. Canada sends out invitations to terrorists Oh, and they
sell
a lot of pot here in the us, cause they are just such upstanding
*nieghbors*..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What the *ell is a "nieghbors"??

Just a neighborly way of referring to our plaid flannel shirted
friends
to the north.

Harry's little suckling will bite at any typo except the ones he and
Harry make. It's all the cowardly little man slut has.- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Bite at this TypoBoy!


It's sort of funny in a pathetic way that dweebs like iboaterloogybitch,
flajim, and the rest of the "anonymous" morons
in reality add nothing to this discussion board beyond their idiotic
posts about those here they don't like. That's why I don't read their
posts...they are totally devoid of interesting comments. And, of course,
they are so cowardly that anything even mildly revealing about
themselves is kept a deep, dark secret. The loogy wannabe might live in
a cardboard box and flajim's only boat probably is a rubber ducky in his
bathtub.


Cowardly is hustling your fat ass into the first college that would
accept you post HS. Smart is not giving you squat to play with. Stupid
is asking dumb questions in the wrong place. Example- *"I wonder, are
1/2 inch thick conductors enough to pump 100A into my house from a 20KW
generator?*

It must have been comical.. "Please daddy, buy me into some **** ass
college even though my grades suck, I don't want to go serve my country,
I am afraid daddy"...


Neither of you could get into an open admissions community college.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.