| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Due Process???
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: On 9/30/2011 9:37 PM, Honey Badger wrote: wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. How do you know he was guilty? Was he tried and convicted, you silly crazy *******? -HB He doesn't know anything, he is just arguing, like he did when he called himself Plum, or Paul, or Areal boater, X-man... What's with the X-Man thing? Is/was he a trans woman? -HB I think so, he and Suckling Don have a very special relationship.... |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Due Process???
On 10/1/11 12:47 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 00:34:36 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 9/30/2011 9:37 PM, Honey Badger wrote: wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. How do you know he was guilty? Was he tried and convicted, you silly crazy *******? -HB He doesn't know anything, he is just arguing, like he did when he called himself Plum, or Paul, or Areal boater, X-man... Still trying to figure that out? When he gets confused by a poster, he assumes it is me. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Due Process???
In article ,
says... On 10/1/11 12:47 PM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 00:34:36 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 9/30/2011 9:37 PM, Honey Badger wrote: wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. How do you know he was guilty? Was he tried and convicted, you silly crazy *******? -HB He doesn't know anything, he is just arguing, like he did when he called himself Plum, or Paul, or Areal boater, X-man... Still trying to figure that out? When he gets confused by a poster, he assumes it is me. Don't give yourself credit, coward. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Due Process???
|
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Due Process???
On 01/10/2011 8:26 AM, John H wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. My guess is Obama wants to look tough or the staff said WFT Obama, we have him!!! So let us do it. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Due Process???
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:50:30 -0400, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John H wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yup. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Due Process???
On 10/1/2011 10:55 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:50:30 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yup. Collateral damage . I'm sure O/bama didn't lose any sleep over it. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Due Process???
On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Due Process???
On Oct 1, 11:09*am, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| One for Scotty due to the Spoofer..... | General | |||
| no boating due to politics | General | |||
| Where Credit Is Due | ASA | |||
| Due to falling poll numbers... | General | |||
| Credit where it's Due | ASA | |||
![iBoaterer[_2_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Hybrid Mode
