On 25/09/2011 3:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 9/25/2011 12:03 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/09/2011 5:41 PM, Eisboch wrote:

Hmmm. That means we might abort a fetus in one case and abort a human
in another.
Are we and the scientists smart enough to determine that? Do we have
the right?

I am not sure we have a choice. Good scientists with high rationality
index, good logic and cognitive skills are the best we have in society
to make a rational decisions.

Probably not smart enough all the same, but sure beats the alternatives.
Would you rather be judged by a flippant politician or statism religion
zealot make the choice?


I would be more in fear of a "secular humanist" like our resident
asshole...

Yep. But the answer also has to do with are you guilty or not and your
position in the system.

For example, under Sharia law you are twice as right as a Muslim male
than a female. And infidels count for nothing, and in fact Sharia
courts my toss out factual scientific evidence in favor of a Muslim
make. Sort of playing poker with two wilds cards dealt to you and there
are only 2 in the deck.

Case in point. Malaysian woman working for slave wages for a Saudi
Muslim woman, Muslim master does not want to let her go. In an effort
to get out, Muslim slave master is killed. Off with the infidels head.
The full story.

http://globalspin.blogs.time.com/201...-saudi-arabia/

Fact is Saudi Arabia is a slave state. Not a week goes by without an
example of required obedience.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_t...n_Saudi_Arabia

Yet King Fahd's sons go to the US all the time, and time to keep both
you girls and boys indoors.

Yet Obama the great ignores this, and goes to Libya with a much better
human rights record in the region.

As Saudi Arabia is amongst the worst human right offenders in the world.

--
First rule of holes: If you're in one, don't keep digging.
So in the hole, why do we insanely want more debt?