Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default Watson Canoes?

Hello all

Done a few searches, can't seem to find much on these guys.

I'm in the market for a new/used canoe. I've been paddling increasingly
over the past couple years and would like to get one for this year.

I'm not looking at spending alot of money initially, and I will be
renting the canoes before I actually buy one. I'll be heading up to
Swift in Muskoka over the next week to see what they have. Budget is
realistically around $1000 (Canadian), so that pretty much means
used/demo/rental from Swift.

I just found Watson canoes (www.watsoncanoes.com), and seeing as they
are about 20 minutes from here, I was going to go check them out. They
say the boats are hand-laid fiberglass, and the 16' Prospector is 58lbs,
which seems manageable.

Anyone know anything about these guys?

Any assistance appreciated,

Thanks

Brian

  #2   Report Post  
Michael Daly
 
Posts: n/a
Default Watson Canoes?

On 18-Apr-2004, John Smith wrote:

I just found Watson canoes (www.watsoncanoes.com), and seeing as they
are about 20 minutes from here, I was going to go check them out. They
say the boats are hand-laid fiberglass, and the 16' Prospector is 58lbs,
which seems manageable.


I have no experience with Watson, but a 58lb fiberglass canoe in a hand layup
at C$800 sounds like a poor quality canoe. There's no way that you can get
an efficient hand layup in that price range (compared to vacuum bagging),
so its weight must mean a light layup. Besides, anyone that calls a canoe
with a plumb stem a Prospector can't possibly know anything useful about
canoes.

Swift makes good canoes and you'd be better off with a used Swift than
an unknown.

Mike
  #3   Report Post  
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default Watson Canoes?

Michael Daly wrote:

I have no experience with Watson, but a 58lb fiberglass canoe in a hand layup
at C$800 sounds like a poor quality canoe. There's no way that you can get
an efficient hand layup in that price range (compared to vacuum bagging),
so its weight must mean a light layup. Besides, anyone that calls a canoe
with a plumb stem a Prospector can't possibly know anything useful about
canoes.

Swift makes good canoes and you'd be better off with a used Swift than
an unknown.

Mike


Fair enough...

So, it seems that I would be looking at either an Algonquin 15 or 16, or
perhaps a Mattawa, if I were to get a Swift. The Mattawa looks to be a
better canoe, I will have to try one.

They will be in Guelph, Ontario next weekend, which is about 1 hours
drive from where I am.

Any comments on either of the above?

Thanks

  #4   Report Post  
Michael Daly
 
Posts: n/a
Default Watson Canoes?

On 18-Apr-2004, John Smith wrote:

So, it seems that I would be looking at either an Algonquin 15 or 16, or
perhaps a Mattawa, if I were to get a Swift. The Mattawa looks to be a
better canoe, I will have to try one.


I haven't paddled a Mattawa, but I did paddle an Algonquin 17 for a weekend
once. I didn't realize that the A-17 was not considered a "serious" canoe -
its marketed as a high-end family or good recreational canoe. I found it
handled quite well and had decent speed. I would have rated as good or
better than many other companies' high-end tripper canoes!

I can't say much about the 15 or 16 foot versions other than to suggest that
if they're comparable to the 17, they're good enough for most paddlers.

If I had to buy a lake tripper tomorrow, I'd get the Swift Kippawa. If
there's one available, give it a look.

They will be in Guelph, Ontario next weekend, which is about 1 hours
drive from where I am.


I bought my last boat - a Boreal Designs Ellesmere sea kayak from Swift
at Guelph two years ago. If you're lucky, you;ll find a deal like I did.

Mike
  #5   Report Post  
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default Watson Canoes?

Michael Daly wrote:


I haven't paddled a Mattawa, but I did paddle an Algonquin 17 for a weekend
once. I didn't realize that the A-17 was not considered a "serious" canoe -
its marketed as a high-end family or good recreational canoe. I found it
handled quite well and had decent speed. I would have rated as good or
better than many other companies' high-end tripper canoes!

I can't say much about the 15 or 16 foot versions other than to suggest that
if they're comparable to the 17, they're good enough for most paddlers.

If I had to buy a lake tripper tomorrow, I'd get the Swift Kippawa. If
there's one available, give it a look.


I bought my last boat - a Boreal Designs Ellesmere sea kayak from Swift
at Guelph two years ago. If you're lucky, you;ll find a deal like I did.

Mike


Thanks again. I've been trying to keep it to 15' or 16'. While the
wife enjoys canoeing, I do see myself going solo from time to time (or
maybe more). To be honest, I haven't done extensive solo in any canoe
recently, but I figure that a 17' (or more) may be a handful at time, at
least more so than a shorter canoe.

I could be way off on that last point.

I'll be doing lake paddling most of the time, doing rivers/creeks to get
to the next lake, but I don't see any whitewater in the foreseeable future.

We do camping, but have found we can fit all our gear into a 15'
comfortably.

I will be fishing extensively from this canoe.

My main canoeing experience from the past few years is using three
different canoes.

One is at the wife's family cottage. This is a green plastic 17'
Coleman with round metal tubes bracing the inside. I find it heavy and
the most difficult to paddle. I took it out two weekends ago for my
first paddle (only choice). I find it generally barge-like.

The other two are at my cousins cottage, which we frequently visit in
the summer. They have a 16 or 17', not sure of the material. It's red
and plasticy, sort of like the Coleman, but stiffer, with no metal
bracing. It's lighter than the Coleman, and seems fairly durable. It
may be Royalex/lite, I've never seen one up close, so I'm not sure
exactly what they look like. Anyways, this is a stable canoe, it seems
OK, but it's still quite heavy.

The last is a Swift, approximately 10 years old. it's a 15', not sure
which model. I'm not exactly sure of the material, but the inside is a
screen-like mesh pattern. It seems very light, although it doesn't seem
like it would appreciate being banged into a rock. This canoe has no
keel, so when I first used it, I thought it felt 'tippy'. After awhile,
I got used to it and find the canoe much more stable than the red one,
especially when you lean over the side, say, to unhook a fish! I guess
that's the Primary/Secondary stability.

Anyways, sorry to ramble, just looking for some input on what may be
suitable for me...

Thanks

Brian



  #6   Report Post  
Michael Daly
 
Posts: n/a
Default Watson Canoes?

On 19-Apr-2004, John Smith wrote:

BTW, I should admit that I haven't canoed in years, since sea kayaking has
taken over. I don't miss canoeing much - or at least, I don't miss the
idiot in the front seat :-). The only thing I miss while sea kayaking
is the ease of portaging my way away from the crowds (and power boats).

To be honest, I haven't done extensive solo in any canoe
recently, but I figure that a 17' (or more) may be a handful at time, at
least more so than a shorter canoe.


It can depend on the canoe. I did a lot of solo paddling in the old days
and found that a good 17' canoe is easier to handle than a poor 15-16'.
If you are talking about a solo canoe (i.e. single seat like the Osprey)
then 15-16' is standard. But for a double, even 17 is not too much
to handle solo if well designed.

It seems very light, although it doesn't seem
like it would appreciate being banged into a rock.


If Kevlar, it can be quite tough even though light.

This canoe has no keel,


Keels affect tracking, not stability. Many canoes get their tracking
stiffness from the bow and stern shape, so the keel is not critical.
The advantage of this design is that they track well but still turn
easily.

so when I first used it, I thought it felt 'tippy'. After awhile,
I got used to it and find the canoe much more stable than the red one,
especially when you lean over the side, say, to unhook a fish! I guess
that's the Primary/Secondary stability.


Correct. Good secondary is more important than high primary.

Mike
  #7   Report Post  
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default Watson Canoes?

Michael Daly wrote:



It can depend on the canoe. I did a lot of solo paddling in the old days
and found that a good 17' canoe is easier to handle than a poor 15-16'.
If you are talking about a solo canoe (i.e. single seat like the Osprey)
then 15-16' is standard. But for a double, even 17 is not too much
to handle solo if well designed.


OK, so my selections have now expanded to most of the line. Algonquin,
Kipawa, Mattawa or maybe a Dumoine.

I guess at this point I'm just going to have to head out on Saturday and
paddle some of these things. Man I'm rusty...

With the asymmetrical canoes, when you paddle them solo, do you still
spin the canoe around and sit in the bow seat? Or am I missing the point
of a kneeling thwart?

Anyways, thanks for all your help. I guess it will probably boil down
to $$, from what I've read, it doesn't seem I'll go too far wrong with
any of these.

Are there good deals at the sales? Here's to hoping I can get into
something in Kevlar!

Thanks again

Brian

  #8   Report Post  
araby
 
Posts: n/a
Default Watson Canoes?

I've just purchased a 16' Prospector. I've also been to their factory and
spoken with Mark Watson.

I researched the market fairly extensively before making a decision and
since my requirement is mainly recreational I was not prepared to pay the
prices quoted by Swift, Scott, Evergreen, Old Town etc. etc. I have looked
at used Swifts in the past and have been frankly disappointed at what they
have offered. The cost savings do not seem much considering the beaten up
nature of most of the boats.

Watson boats are hand laid up and seem well generally well constructed. They
have a few canoes on sale and you might (like me) find a Prospector at about
CAD $100 off. The current book prices are $799 for the Prospector single
keel and $689 for the triple keel. Without doubt part of the reason for
their low prices is their overhead. Their premises are small and very
modest. However, they have been in the business for over 30 years and seem
to enjoy a fairly good reputation locally at least.

Regards,

Roy

I'm in the market for a new/used canoe. I've been paddling increasingly
over the past couple years and would like to get one for this year.

I'm not looking at spending alot of money initially, and I will be
renting the canoes before I actually buy one. I'll be heading up to
Swift in Muskoka over the next week to see what they have. Budget is
realistically around $1000 (Canadian), so that pretty much means
used/demo/rental from Swift.

I just found Watson canoes (www.watsoncanoes.com), and seeing as they
are about 20 minutes from here, I was going to go check them out. They
say the boats are hand-laid fiberglass, and the 16' Prospector is 58lbs,
which seems manageable.

Anyone know anything about these guys?

Any assistance appreciated,

Thanks

Brian



  #9   Report Post  
araby
 
Posts: n/a
Default Watson Canoes?

CORRECTION: The name of the Watson 16' boats is "Voyageur" -not
"Prospector".

I've just finished reading "Fire in the Bones" and have "Prospector" on the
brain

Apologies,

Roy

"araby" wrote in message
t.cable.rogers.com...
I've just purchased a 16' Prospector. I've also been to their factory and
spoken with Mark Watson.

I researched the market fairly extensively before making a decision and
since my requirement is mainly recreational I was not prepared to pay the
prices quoted by Swift, Scott, Evergreen, Old Town etc. etc. I have looked
at used Swifts in the past and have been frankly disappointed at what they
have offered. The cost savings do not seem much considering the beaten up
nature of most of the boats.

Watson boats are hand laid up and seem well generally well constructed.

They
have a few canoes on sale and you might (like me) find a Prospector at

about
CAD $100 off. The current book prices are $799 for the Prospector single
keel and $689 for the triple keel. Without doubt part of the reason for
their low prices is their overhead. Their premises are small and very
modest. However, they have been in the business for over 30 years and seem
to enjoy a fairly good reputation locally at least.

Regards,

Roy

I'm in the market for a new/used canoe. I've been paddling increasingly
over the past couple years and would like to get one for this year.

I'm not looking at spending alot of money initially, and I will be
renting the canoes before I actually buy one. I'll be heading up to
Swift in Muskoka over the next week to see what they have. Budget is
realistically around $1000 (Canadian), so that pretty much means
used/demo/rental from Swift.

I just found Watson canoes (www.watsoncanoes.com), and seeing as they
are about 20 minutes from here, I was going to go check them out. They
say the boats are hand-laid fiberglass, and the 16' Prospector is 58lbs,
which seems manageable.

Anyone know anything about these guys?

Any assistance appreciated,

Thanks

Brian





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Polynesian canoes ( Rat genes solve mystery of great Pacificodyssey Yuri Kuchinsky General 6 July 6th 04 12:59 AM
Polynesian canoes ( Rat genes solve mystery of great Pacific odyssey Yuri Kuchinsky Boat Building 29 June 29th 04 10:07 PM
Polynesian canoes ( Rat genes solve mystery of great Pacific odyssey Yuri Kuchinsky General 0 June 28th 04 06:06 PM
Anyone using Sponsons? Tim Ingram General 12 February 28th 04 11:11 PM
Wall Street Journal - Penobscots Make Birchbark Canoes Auerbach Boat Building 3 August 31st 03 02:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017