On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:35:06 -0700, wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:49:37 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 9/12/11 1:43 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B


This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243


The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo
tell all:

http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx

I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are
many people with the same name and who live in the same general
location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't
look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very
careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions.

I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous
dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a
fool would think they're the same person.


The right-wing trash here has been posting that "child molester" URL for
years. They've also known for years that the molester ain't me.
Different actual names, different birthdays, different heights, et
cetera. Wayne continues his jump aboard the right-wing asshole bandwagon.

As you point out, there are many people with identical or similar names,
and there are many morons out there who will use coincidence to further
their agenda of hate.

I noticed that a majority of posts here today have to do with me, and
I'm barely posting here, and haven't posted much for days. What that
demonstrates is the obsession the right-wing trash here has for me.

Amazingly, my name Nom de Plume is a fairly common name. LOL

Yes, I've noticed it's very popular among the literary crowd.

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:01:57 -0400, Drifter wrote:

On 9/12/2011 1:43 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:30:45 -0400, wrote:

In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7
@w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says...

On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C.
wrote:
Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:

800.04 Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or
In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent
Manner

A person who:

(1) Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years
in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner;

(2) Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse,
actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which
simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon
any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to
commit any such act;

(3) Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h)
upon any child under the age of 16 years; or

(4) Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of
any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of
sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the
victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the
crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby
does not under any circumstance violate this section.

This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely
accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board.


Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester?

========

The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo
tell all:

http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx

I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are
many people with the same name and who live in the same general
location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't
look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very
careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions.

I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous
dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a
fool would think they're the same person.

Thanks, but we don't need your help. We have the situation under control.

You idiots can't control anything, least of all yourselves.

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:23:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:01:57 -0400, Drifter wrote:

On 9/12/2011 1:43 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:30:45 -0400, wrote:

In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7
@w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says...

On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C.
wrote:
Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:

800.04 Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or
In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent
Manner

A person who:

(1) Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years
in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner;

(2) Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse,
actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which
simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon
any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to
commit any such act;

(3) Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h)
upon any child under the age of 16 years; or

(4) Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of
any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of
sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the
victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the
crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby
does not under any circumstance violate this section.

This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely
accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board.


Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester?

========

The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo
tell all:

http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx

I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are
many people with the same name and who live in the same general
location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't
look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very
careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions.

I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous
dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a
fool would think they're the same person.

Thanks, but we don't need your help. We have the situation under control.

You idiots can't control anything, least of all yourselves.

Thaaaat's what that smell is...

On 9/12/2011 4:14 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:06:53 -0400, wrote:

All you need to do is offer some proof. Your word isn't good enough,
evidenced by you breaking it several times today.

=============

Why don't you follow up the link that I offered and find out for
yourself?

http://www.instantcheckmate.com/home/30?mdm=Display&src=GLE&cmp=KwBD

I did. He links to Karen Grear and some other dude. Did I miss something?

On 9/12/2011 5:32 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:23:57 -0700, wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:01:57 -0400, wrote:

On 9/12/2011 1:43 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:30:45 -0400, wrote:

In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7
@w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says...

On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C.
wrote:
Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:

800.04 Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or
In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent
Manner

A person who:

(1) Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years
in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner;

(2) Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse,
actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which
simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon
any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to
commit any such act;

(3) Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h)
upon any child under the age of 16 years; or

(4) Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of
any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of
sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the
victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the
crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby
does not under any circumstance violate this section.

This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely
accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board.


Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester?

========

The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo
tell all:

http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx

I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are
many people with the same name and who live in the same general
location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't
look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very
careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions.

I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous
dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a
fool would think they're the same person.

Thanks, but we don't need your help. We have the situation under control.

You idiots can't control anything, least of all yourselves.

Thaaaat's what that smell is...

Who is this jps golf ball you are listening to?
It's fish you smell. From your Icelander genes and probably your jeans
as well.

On Sep 12, 3:57*pm, JustWait wrote:
On 9/12/2011 2:47 PM, Drifter wrote:





On 9/12/2011 1:49 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/12/11 1:43 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B

This is the link to the sexual offender
case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo
tell all:

http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-asso...

I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are
many people with the same name and who live in the same general
location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't
look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very
careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions.

I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous
dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a
fool would think they're the same person.

The right-wing trash here has been posting that "child molester" URL for
years. They've also known for years that the molester ain't me.
Different actual names, different birthdays, different heights, et
cetera. Wayne continues his jump aboard the right-wing asshole bandwagon.

As you point out, there are many people with identical or similar names,
and there are many morons out there who will use coincidence to further
their agenda of hate.

I noticed that a majority of posts here today have to do with me, and
I'm barely posting here, and haven't posted much for days. What that
demonstrates is the obsession the right-wing trash here has for me.

POST #2 YOU CAN'T KEEP YOUR PROMISES WAFA

He is funny. I stopped posting about him weeks ago but he chased me and
called me out by name each and every day. I have several of his old
posts saved just in case.....- Hide quoted text -


In case of what??
I thought you TeaBaggers believed in responsibility... paying your own
way and not sucking on the gov't teat.
I've had a disturbing notification come across my desk stating that
someone's gonna be chasing you... real soon.
Better pay up while you can!

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:51:37 -0400, Drifter wrote:


Why don't you follow up the link that I offered and find out for
yourself?

http://www.instantcheckmate.com/home/30?mdm=Display&src=GLE&cmp=KwBD

I did. He links to Karen Grear and some other dude. Did I miss something?

===

Yes.

For a price, Checkmate will get you complete criminal history and
background information on anyone. It is supposedly a reputable
service.

http://www.instantcheckmate.com/home/30?mdm=Display&src=GLE&cmp=KwBD

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:27:31 -0700 (PDT), Edor
wrote:

On Sep 12, 7:55*am, Drifter wrote:
On 9/12/2011 8:48 AM, iBoatMore wrote:





In ,
says...

In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7
@w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says...

On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C.
wrote:
Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:

800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or
In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent
Manner

A person who:

(1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years
in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner;

(2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse,
actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which
simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon
any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to
commit any such act;

(3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h)
upon any child under the age of 16 years; or

(4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of
any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of
sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the
victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the
crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby
does not under any circumstance violate this section.

This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely
accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board.

Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester?

Not that I've seen.

Doesn't mean a thing. He has never denied being an asshole either. Or a
liar. or a loser, or a racist. Wait a minute. He did deny that one.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Here's a link to a Maryland case in which a Harry Krause was found
guilty by a jury of child sexual abuse: http://www.marylandfathers.org/FUERhist1990s.html.

You ****ing idiot. Did you bother to read that section that states
that he commited suicide?

Jesus Christ you people are stupid. Get a ****ing hobby.

You ****ing idiot did you read what he wrote "in which a Harry
Krause..."

On Sep 12, 8:17*am, Drifter wrote:
On 9/12/2011 5:33 AM, *e#c wrote:





On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C.
wrote:
Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:

800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or
In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent
Manner

A person who:

(1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years
in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner;

(2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse,
actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which
simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon
any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to
commit any such act;

(3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h)
upon any child under the age of 16 years; or

(4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of
any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of
sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the
victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the
crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby
does not under any circumstance violate this section.

This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely
accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board.

He already admitted to living in Florida. But I didn't see George
accusing anyone of anything.
When you accuse someone of accusing someone of something, you ought to
make damn sure or it could cost you some court time for falsely accusing
someone and blathering it all over this board.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But I didn't see George accusing anyone of anything.

I sure did. No back peddling now.....

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:42:00 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:27:31 -0700 (PDT), Edor
wrote:

On Sep 12, 7:55*am, Drifter wrote:
On 9/12/2011 8:48 AM, iBoatMore wrote:





In ,
says...

In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7
@w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says...

On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C.
wrote:
Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:

800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or
In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent
Manner

A person who:

(1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years
in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner;

(2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse,
actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which
simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon
any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to
commit any such act;

(3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h)
upon any child under the age of 16 years; or

(4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of
any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of
sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the
victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the
crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby
does not under any circumstance violate this section.

This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely
accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board.

Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester?

Not that I've seen.

Doesn't mean a thing. He has never denied being an asshole either. Or a
liar. or a loser, or a racist. Wait a minute. He did deny that one.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Here's a link to a Maryland case in which a Harry Krause was found
guilty by a jury of child sexual abuse: http://www.marylandfathers.org/FUERhist1990s.html.

You ****ing idiot. Did you bother to read that section that states
that he commited suicide?

Jesus Christ you people are stupid. Get a ****ing hobby.

You ****ing idiot did you read what he wrote "in which a Harry
Krause..."

You and your buddies sure do seem to have a major _thing_ for Harry.