This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
 

Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:

800.04 Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or
In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent
Manner

A person who:


(1) Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years
in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner;


(2) Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse,
actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which
simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon
any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to
commit any such act;


(3) Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h)
upon any child under the age of 16 years; or


(4) Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of
any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of
sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the
victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the
crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby
does not under any circumstance violate this section.


This is the link to the sexual offender case:
http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted ofin Florida
 

On Sep 11, 8:40*pm, "George C. Boater"
wrote:
Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:

800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or
In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent
Manner

A person who:

(1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years
in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner;

(2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse,
actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which
simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon
any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to
commit any such act;

(3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h)
upon any child under the age of 16 years; or

(4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of
any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of
sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the
victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the
crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby
does not under any circumstance violate this section.

This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely
accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board.

This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
 

In article 340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7
@w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says...

On Sep 11, 8:40*pm, "George C. Boater"
wrote:
Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:

800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or
In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent
Manner

A person who:

(1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years
in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner;

(2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse,
actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which
simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon
any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to
commit any such act;

(3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h)
upon any child under the age of 16 years; or

(4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of
any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of
sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the
victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the
crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby
does not under any circumstance violate this section.

This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely
accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board.


Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester?

This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted ofin Florida
 

On Sep 12, 6:30*am, BAR wrote:
In article 340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7
@w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says...







On Sep 11, 8:40*pm, "George C. Boater"
wrote:
Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:

800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or
In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent
Manner

A person who:

(1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years
in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner;

(2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse,
actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which
simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon
any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to
commit any such act;

(3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h)
upon any child under the age of 16 years; or

(4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of
any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of
sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the
victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the
crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby
does not under any circumstance violate this section.

This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely
accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board.

Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm not aware that he has ever denied it. He can do so here and clear
it up for everyone.

This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convictedof in Florida
 

On 9/12/2011 5:33 AM, *e#c wrote:
On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C.
wrote:
Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:

800.04 Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or
In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent
Manner

A person who:

(1) Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years
in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner;

(2) Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse,
actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which
simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon
any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to
commit any such act;

(3) Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h)
upon any child under the age of 16 years; or

(4) Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of
any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of
sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the
victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the
crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby
does not under any circumstance violate this section.

This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely
accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board.

He already admitted to living in Florida. But I didn't see George
accusing anyone of anything.
When you accuse someone of accusing someone of something, you ought to
make damn sure or it could cost you some court time for falsely accusing
someone and blathering it all over this board.

This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
 

In article ,
says...

In article 340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7
@w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says...

On Sep 11, 8:40*pm, "George C. Boater"
wrote:
Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:

800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or
In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent
Manner

A person who:

(1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years
in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner;

(2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse,
actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which
simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon
any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to
commit any such act;

(3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h)
upon any child under the age of 16 years; or

(4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of
any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of
sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the
victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the
crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby
does not under any circumstance violate this section.

This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely
accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board.


Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester?

Not that I've seen.

This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convictedof in Florida
 

On 9/12/2011 8:48 AM, iBoatMore wrote:
In ,
says...

In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7
@w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says...

On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C.
wrote:
Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:

800.04 Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or
In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent
Manner

A person who:

(1) Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years
in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner;

(2) Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse,
actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which
simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon
any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to
commit any such act;

(3) Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h)
upon any child under the age of 16 years; or

(4) Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of
any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of
sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the
victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the
crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby
does not under any circumstance violate this section.

This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely
accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board.


Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester?

Not that I've seen.

Doesn't mean a thing. He has never denied being an asshole either. Or a
liar. or a loser, or a racist. Wait a minute. He did deny that one.

This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted ofin Florida
 

On Sep 12, 7:55*am, Drifter wrote:
On 9/12/2011 8:48 AM, iBoatMore wrote:





In ,
says...

In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7
@w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says...

On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C.
wrote:
Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:

800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or
In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent
Manner

A person who:

(1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years
in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner;

(2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse,
actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which
simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon
any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to
commit any such act;

(3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h)
upon any child under the age of 16 years; or

(4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of
any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of
sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the
victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the
crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby
does not under any circumstance violate this section.

This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely
accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board.

Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester?

Not that I've seen.

Doesn't mean a thing. He has never denied being an asshole either. Or a
liar. or a loser, or a racist. Wait a minute. He did deny that one.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Here's a link to a Maryland case in which a Harry Krause was found
guilty by a jury of child sexual abuse: http://www.marylandfathers.org/FUERhist1990s.html.

This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
 

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:30:45 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article 340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7
, says...

On Sep 11, 8:40*pm, "George C. Boater"
wrote:
Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:

800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or
In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent
Manner

A person who:

(1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years
in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner;

(2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse,
actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which
simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon
any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to
commit any such act;

(3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h)
upon any child under the age of 16 years; or

(4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of
any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of
sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the
victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the
crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby
does not under any circumstance violate this section.

This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely
accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board.


Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester?

========

The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo
tell all:

http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx

This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
 

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:30:45 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article 340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7
, says...

On Sep 11, 8:40*pm, "George C. Boater"
wrote:
Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:

800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or
In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent
Manner

A person who:

(1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years
in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner;

(2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse,
actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which
simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon
any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to
commit any such act;

(3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h)
upon any child under the age of 16 years; or

(4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of
any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of
sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the
victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the
crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby
does not under any circumstance violate this section.

This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243

Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely
accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board.


Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester?

========

The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo
tell all:

http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx

I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are
many people with the same name and who live in the same general
location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't
look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very
careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions.

I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous
dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a
fool would think they're the same person.