|
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida:
800.04 Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case: http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted ofin Florida
On Sep 11, 8:40*pm, "George C. Boater"
wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted ofin Florida
On Sep 12, 6:30*am, BAR wrote:
In article 340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 @w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 11, 8:40*pm, "George C. Boater" wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm not aware that he has ever denied it. He can do so here and clear it up for everyone. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convictedof in Florida
On 9/12/2011 5:33 AM, *e#c wrote:
On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C. wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. He already admitted to living in Florida. But I didn't see George accusing anyone of anything. When you accuse someone of accusing someone of something, you ought to make damn sure or it could cost you some court time for falsely accusing someone and blathering it all over this board. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
In article ,
says... In article 340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 @w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 11, 8:40*pm, "George C. Boater" wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? Not that I've seen. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convictedof in Florida
On 9/12/2011 8:48 AM, iBoatMore wrote:
In , says... In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 @w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C. wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? Not that I've seen. Doesn't mean a thing. He has never denied being an asshole either. Or a liar. or a loser, or a racist. Wait a minute. He did deny that one. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted ofin Florida
On Sep 12, 7:55*am, Drifter wrote:
On 9/12/2011 8:48 AM, iBoatMore wrote: In , says... In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 @w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C. wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? Not that I've seen. Doesn't mean a thing. He has never denied being an asshole either. Or a liar. or a loser, or a racist. Wait a minute. He did deny that one.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Here's a link to a Maryland case in which a Harry Krause was found guilty by a jury of child sexual abuse: http://www.marylandfathers.org/FUERhist1990s.html. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:30:45 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article 340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 , says... On Sep 11, 8:40*pm, "George C. Boater" wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? ======== The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo tell all: http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:30:45 -0400, BAR wrote: In article 340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 , says... On Sep 11, 8:40*pm, "George C. Boater" wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? ======== The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo tell all: http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are many people with the same name and who live in the same general location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions. I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a fool would think they're the same person. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convictedof in Florida
On 9/12/11 1:43 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo tell all: http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are many people with the same name and who live in the same general location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions. I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a fool would think they're the same person. The right-wing trash here has been posting that "child molester" URL for years. They've also known for years that the molester ain't me. Different actual names, different birthdays, different heights, et cetera. Wayne continues his jump aboard the right-wing asshole bandwagon. As you point out, there are many people with identical or similar names, and there are many morons out there who will use coincidence to further their agenda of hate. I noticed that a majority of posts here today have to do with me, and I'm barely posting here, and haven't posted much for days. What that demonstrates is the obsession the right-wing trash here has for me. -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:30:45 -0400, BAR wrote: In article 340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 , says... On Sep 11, 8:40*pm, "George C. Boater" wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? ======== The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo tell all: http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx Wow Wayne, you're quite the sleuth. Nothing better to do? |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:27:31 -0700 (PDT), Edor
wrote: On Sep 12, 7:55*am, Drifter wrote: On 9/12/2011 8:48 AM, iBoatMore wrote: In , says... In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 @w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C. wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? Not that I've seen. Doesn't mean a thing. He has never denied being an asshole either. Or a liar. or a loser, or a racist. Wait a minute. He did deny that one.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Here's a link to a Maryland case in which a Harry Krause was found guilty by a jury of child sexual abuse: http://www.marylandfathers.org/FUERhist1990s.html. You ****ing idiot. Did you bother to read that section that states that he commited suicide? Jesus Christ you people are stupid. Get a ****ing hobby. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:49:37 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: On 9/12/11 1:43 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo tell all: http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are many people with the same name and who live in the same general location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions. I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a fool would think they're the same person. The right-wing trash here has been posting that "child molester" URL for years. They've also known for years that the molester ain't me. Different actual names, different birthdays, different heights, et cetera. Wayne continues his jump aboard the right-wing asshole bandwagon. As you point out, there are many people with identical or similar names, and there are many morons out there who will use coincidence to further their agenda of hate. I noticed that a majority of posts here today have to do with me, and I'm barely posting here, and haven't posted much for days. What that demonstrates is the obsession the right-wing trash here has for me. Amazingly, my name Nom de Plume is a fairly common name. LOL |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convictedof in Florida
On 9/12/2011 1:49 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/12/11 1:43 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo tell all: http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are many people with the same name and who live in the same general location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions. I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a fool would think they're the same person. The right-wing trash here has been posting that "child molester" URL for years. They've also known for years that the molester ain't me. Different actual names, different birthdays, different heights, et cetera. Wayne continues his jump aboard the right-wing asshole bandwagon. As you point out, there are many people with identical or similar names, and there are many morons out there who will use coincidence to further their agenda of hate. I noticed that a majority of posts here today have to do with me, and I'm barely posting here, and haven't posted much for days. What that demonstrates is the obsession the right-wing trash here has for me. POST #2 YOU CAN'T KEEP YOUR PROMISES WAFA |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convictedof in Florida
On 9/12/2011 2:47 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 9/12/2011 1:49 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 9/12/11 1:43 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo tell all: http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are many people with the same name and who live in the same general location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions. I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a fool would think they're the same person. The right-wing trash here has been posting that "child molester" URL for years. They've also known for years that the molester ain't me. Different actual names, different birthdays, different heights, et cetera. Wayne continues his jump aboard the right-wing asshole bandwagon. As you point out, there are many people with identical or similar names, and there are many morons out there who will use coincidence to further their agenda of hate. I noticed that a majority of posts here today have to do with me, and I'm barely posting here, and haven't posted much for days. What that demonstrates is the obsession the right-wing trash here has for me. POST #2 YOU CAN'T KEEP YOUR PROMISES WAFA He is funny. I stopped posting about him weeks ago but he chased me and called me out by name each and every day. I have several of his old posts saved just in case..... |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convictedof in Florida
On 9/12/2011 1:43 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:30:45 -0400, wrote: In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 @w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C. wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? ======== The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo tell all: http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are many people with the same name and who live in the same general location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions. I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a fool would think they're the same person. Thanks, but we don't need your help. We have the situation under control. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convictedof in Florida
On 9/12/2011 1:49 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/12/11 1:43 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo tell all: http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are many people with the same name and who live in the same general location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions. I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a fool would think they're the same person. The right-wing trash here has been posting that "child molester" URL for years. They've also known for years that the molester ain't me. Different actual names, different birthdays, different heights, et cetera. Wayne continues his jump aboard the right-wing asshole bandwagon. As you point out, there are many people with identical or similar names, and there are many morons out there who will use coincidence to further their agenda of hate. I noticed that a majority of posts here today have to do with me, and I'm barely posting here, and haven't posted much for days. What that demonstrates is the obsession the right-wing trash here has for me. All you need to do is offer some proof. Your word isn't good enough, evidenced by you breaking it several times today. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convictedof in Florida
On 9/12/2011 2:57 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 9/12/2011 2:47 PM, Drifter wrote: On 9/12/2011 1:49 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 9/12/11 1:43 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo tell all: http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are many people with the same name and who live in the same general location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions. I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a fool would think they're the same person. The right-wing trash here has been posting that "child molester" URL for years. They've also known for years that the molester ain't me. Different actual names, different birthdays, different heights, et cetera. Wayne continues his jump aboard the right-wing asshole bandwagon. As you point out, there are many people with identical or similar names, and there are many morons out there who will use coincidence to further their agenda of hate. I noticed that a majority of posts here today have to do with me, and I'm barely posting here, and haven't posted much for days. What that demonstrates is the obsession the right-wing trash here has for me. POST #2 YOU CAN'T KEEP YOUR PROMISES WAFA He is funny. I stopped posting about him weeks ago but he chased me and called me out by name each and every day. I have several of his old posts saved just in case..... I don't think he's funny. He's a dirtbag, a liar, and a coward. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:06:53 -0400, Drifter wrote:
All you need to do is offer some proof. Your word isn't good enough, evidenced by you breaking it several times today. ============= Why don't you follow up the link that I offered and find out for yourself? http://www.instantcheckmate.com/home/30?mdm=Display&src=GLE&cmp=KwBD |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:35:06 -0700, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:49:37 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 9/12/11 1:43 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo tell all: http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are many people with the same name and who live in the same general location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions. I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a fool would think they're the same person. The right-wing trash here has been posting that "child molester" URL for years. They've also known for years that the molester ain't me. Different actual names, different birthdays, different heights, et cetera. Wayne continues his jump aboard the right-wing asshole bandwagon. As you point out, there are many people with identical or similar names, and there are many morons out there who will use coincidence to further their agenda of hate. I noticed that a majority of posts here today have to do with me, and I'm barely posting here, and haven't posted much for days. What that demonstrates is the obsession the right-wing trash here has for me. Amazingly, my name Nom de Plume is a fairly common name. LOL Yes, I've noticed it's very popular among the literary crowd. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:01:57 -0400, Drifter wrote:
On 9/12/2011 1:43 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:30:45 -0400, wrote: In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 @w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C. wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? ======== The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo tell all: http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are many people with the same name and who live in the same general location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions. I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a fool would think they're the same person. Thanks, but we don't need your help. We have the situation under control. You idiots can't control anything, least of all yourselves. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:23:57 -0700, jps wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:01:57 -0400, Drifter wrote: On 9/12/2011 1:43 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:30:45 -0400, wrote: In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 @w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C. wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? ======== The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo tell all: http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are many people with the same name and who live in the same general location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions. I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a fool would think they're the same person. Thanks, but we don't need your help. We have the situation under control. You idiots can't control anything, least of all yourselves. Thaaaat's what that smell is... |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convictedof in Florida
On 9/12/2011 4:14 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:06:53 -0400, wrote: All you need to do is offer some proof. Your word isn't good enough, evidenced by you breaking it several times today. ============= Why don't you follow up the link that I offered and find out for yourself? http://www.instantcheckmate.com/home/30?mdm=Display&src=GLE&cmp=KwBD I did. He links to Karen Grear and some other dude. Did I miss something? |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convictedof in Florida
On 9/12/2011 5:32 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:23:57 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:01:57 -0400, wrote: On 9/12/2011 1:43 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:30:45 -0400, wrote: In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 @w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C. wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? ======== The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo tell all: http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-associates-inc-6236052.aspx I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are many people with the same name and who live in the same general location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions. I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a fool would think they're the same person. Thanks, but we don't need your help. We have the situation under control. You idiots can't control anything, least of all yourselves. Thaaaat's what that smell is... Who is this jps golf ball you are listening to? It's fish you smell. From your Icelander genes and probably your jeans as well. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted ofin Florida
On Sep 12, 3:57*pm, JustWait wrote:
On 9/12/2011 2:47 PM, Drifter wrote: On 9/12/2011 1:49 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 9/12/11 1:43 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:24:33 -0400, Wayne B This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 The internet knows all, and in exchange for a few dinero will aslo tell all: http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Jacksonville/harry-krause-asso... I don't know Harry or what this case has to do with him, as there are many people with the same name and who live in the same general location. (There's a Bradley Pitt in a nearby town, but he doesn't look like the Brad Pitt.) My opinion is that one should be very careful making accusations and jumping to conclusions. I have a client who's name is Anne Boleyn (actually another famous dead person - I'm using a fake name as an example). I think only a fool would think they're the same person. The right-wing trash here has been posting that "child molester" URL for years. They've also known for years that the molester ain't me. Different actual names, different birthdays, different heights, et cetera. Wayne continues his jump aboard the right-wing asshole bandwagon. As you point out, there are many people with identical or similar names, and there are many morons out there who will use coincidence to further their agenda of hate. I noticed that a majority of posts here today have to do with me, and I'm barely posting here, and haven't posted much for days. What that demonstrates is the obsession the right-wing trash here has for me. POST #2 YOU CAN'T KEEP YOUR PROMISES WAFA He is funny. I stopped posting about him weeks ago but he chased me and called me out by name each and every day. I have several of his old posts saved just in case.....- Hide quoted text - In case of what?? I thought you TeaBaggers believed in responsibility... paying your own way and not sucking on the gov't teat. I've had a disturbing notification come across my desk stating that someone's gonna be chasing you... real soon. Better pay up while you can! |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:51:37 -0400, Drifter wrote:
Why don't you follow up the link that I offered and find out for yourself? http://www.instantcheckmate.com/home/30?mdm=Display&src=GLE&cmp=KwBD I did. He links to Karen Grear and some other dude. Did I miss something? === Yes. For a price, Checkmate will get you complete criminal history and background information on anyone. It is supposedly a reputable service. http://www.instantcheckmate.com/home/30?mdm=Display&src=GLE&cmp=KwBD |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
In article ,
says... On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:27:31 -0700 (PDT), Edor wrote: On Sep 12, 7:55*am, Drifter wrote: On 9/12/2011 8:48 AM, iBoatMore wrote: In , says... In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 @w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C. wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? Not that I've seen. Doesn't mean a thing. He has never denied being an asshole either. Or a liar. or a loser, or a racist. Wait a minute. He did deny that one.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Here's a link to a Maryland case in which a Harry Krause was found guilty by a jury of child sexual abuse: http://www.marylandfathers.org/FUERhist1990s.html. You ****ing idiot. Did you bother to read that section that states that he commited suicide? Jesus Christ you people are stupid. Get a ****ing hobby. You ****ing idiot did you read what he wrote "in which a Harry Krause..." |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted ofin Florida
On Sep 12, 8:17*am, Drifter wrote:
On 9/12/2011 5:33 AM, *e#c wrote: On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C. wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. He already admitted to living in Florida. But I didn't see George accusing anyone of anything. When you accuse someone of accusing someone of something, you ought to make damn sure or it could cost you some court time for falsely accusing someone and blathering it all over this board.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But I didn't see George accusing anyone of anything. I sure did. No back peddling now..... |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:42:00 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:27:31 -0700 (PDT), Edor wrote: On Sep 12, 7:55*am, Drifter wrote: On 9/12/2011 8:48 AM, iBoatMore wrote: In , says... In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 @w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C. wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? Not that I've seen. Doesn't mean a thing. He has never denied being an asshole either. Or a liar. or a loser, or a racist. Wait a minute. He did deny that one.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Here's a link to a Maryland case in which a Harry Krause was found guilty by a jury of child sexual abuse: http://www.marylandfathers.org/FUERhist1990s.html. You ****ing idiot. Did you bother to read that section that states that he commited suicide? Jesus Christ you people are stupid. Get a ****ing hobby. You ****ing idiot did you read what he wrote "in which a Harry Krause..." You and your buddies sure do seem to have a major _thing_ for Harry. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:32:56 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:51:37 -0400, Drifter wrote: Why don't you follow up the link that I offered and find out for yourself? http://www.instantcheckmate.com/home/30?mdm=Display&src=GLE&cmp=KwBD I did. He links to Karen Grear and some other dude. Did I miss something? === Yes. For a price, Checkmate will get you complete criminal history and background information on anyone. It is supposedly a reputable service. http://www.instantcheckmate.com/home/30?mdm=Display&src=GLE&cmp=KwBD Why don't you post this a few dozen times. Sheesh.. do you have stock in the company? |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:56:12 -0700, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:42:00 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:27:31 -0700 (PDT), Edor wrote: On Sep 12, 7:55*am, Drifter wrote: On 9/12/2011 8:48 AM, iBoatMore wrote: In , says... In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 @w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C. wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? Not that I've seen. Doesn't mean a thing. He has never denied being an asshole either. Or a liar. or a loser, or a racist. Wait a minute. He did deny that one.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Here's a link to a Maryland case in which a Harry Krause was found guilty by a jury of child sexual abuse: http://www.marylandfathers.org/FUERhist1990s.html. You ****ing idiot. Did you bother to read that section that states that he commited suicide? Jesus Christ you people are stupid. Get a ****ing hobby. You ****ing idiot did you read what he wrote "in which a Harry Krause..." You and your buddies sure do seem to have a major _thing_ for Harry. A gaggle of ding-a-lings with nothing better to do than try to rip at lefties who they know are far better off. Drives 'em nuts. How's your plan going for the sailboat? Making progress? |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convictedof in Florida
|
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:03:49 -0700, jps wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:56:12 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:42:00 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:27:31 -0700 (PDT), Edor wrote: On Sep 12, 7:55*am, Drifter wrote: On 9/12/2011 8:48 AM, iBoatMore wrote: In , says... In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 @w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C. wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? Not that I've seen. Doesn't mean a thing. He has never denied being an asshole either. Or a liar. or a loser, or a racist. Wait a minute. He did deny that one.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Here's a link to a Maryland case in which a Harry Krause was found guilty by a jury of child sexual abuse: http://www.marylandfathers.org/FUERhist1990s.html. You ****ing idiot. Did you bother to read that section that states that he commited suicide? Jesus Christ you people are stupid. Get a ****ing hobby. You ****ing idiot did you read what he wrote "in which a Harry Krause..." You and your buddies sure do seem to have a major _thing_ for Harry. A gaggle of ding-a-lings with nothing better to do than try to rip at lefties who they know are far better off. Drives 'em nuts. How's your plan going for the sailboat? Making progress? No doubt. Well, we did some sailing off SF this summer. I might get invited in France. I'm working on that. :) I've also took some lessons.. just the basic stuff. We've looked at a lot of boats. For monohull, the general consensus is a Valiant. For a catamaran, a general consensus doesn't yet exist. They're also more expensive of course. But, they would do well in places like the Caribbean, and they're very popular. They also don't heel over, so that's a plus for kids, guests, frightened men.. lol |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted ofin Florida
On Sep 12, 6:32*pm, Wayne B wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:51:37 -0400, Drifter wrote: Why don't you follow up the link that I offered and find out for yourself? http://www.instantcheckmate.com/home/30?mdm=Display&src=GLE&cmp=KwBD I did. He links to Karen Grear and some other dude. Did I miss something? === Yes. * For a price, Checkmate will get you complete criminal history and background information on anyone. *It is supposedly a reputable service. http://www.instantcheckmate.com/home/30?mdm=Display&src=GLE&cmp=KwBD Thanks for the link. Really amazing what you can discover about someone for $20. Very interesting! |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:34:32 -0700, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:03:49 -0700, jps wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:56:12 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:42:00 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:27:31 -0700 (PDT), Edor wrote: On Sep 12, 7:55*am, Drifter wrote: On 9/12/2011 8:48 AM, iBoatMore wrote: In , says... In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 @w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C. wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? Not that I've seen. Doesn't mean a thing. He has never denied being an asshole either. Or a liar. or a loser, or a racist. Wait a minute. He did deny that one.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Here's a link to a Maryland case in which a Harry Krause was found guilty by a jury of child sexual abuse: http://www.marylandfathers.org/FUERhist1990s.html. You ****ing idiot. Did you bother to read that section that states that he commited suicide? Jesus Christ you people are stupid. Get a ****ing hobby. You ****ing idiot did you read what he wrote "in which a Harry Krause..." You and your buddies sure do seem to have a major _thing_ for Harry. A gaggle of ding-a-lings with nothing better to do than try to rip at lefties who they know are far better off. Drives 'em nuts. How's your plan going for the sailboat? Making progress? No doubt. Well, we did some sailing off SF this summer. I might get invited in France. I'm working on that. :) I've also took some lessons.. just the basic stuff. We've looked at a lot of boats. For monohull, the general consensus is a Valiant. For a catamaran, a general consensus doesn't yet exist. They're also more expensive of course. But, they would do well in places like the Caribbean, and they're very popular. They also don't heel over, so that's a plus for kids, guests, frightened men.. lol I've always preferred upright in boats. Something about healing over in rough seas just doesn't do it for me. If I were a sailor, it'd be a cat. |
This is the criminal statute that a Harry Krause was convicted of in Florida
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:23:34 -0700, jps wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:34:32 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:03:49 -0700, jps wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:56:12 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:42:00 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:27:31 -0700 (PDT), Edor wrote: On Sep 12, 7:55*am, Drifter wrote: On 9/12/2011 8:48 AM, iBoatMore wrote: In , says... In article340f21d7-1ce3-40db-9f91-70e11c9503b7 @w21g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 11, 8:40 pm, "George C. wrote: Not sure if it is our boy, but he used to live in Florida: 800.04 *Lewdly Fondle Or Assault, Commit Or Simulate Sexual Acts On Or In Presence Of A Child Under 16 In A Lewd, Lascivious Or Indecent Manner A person who: (1) *Handles, fondles, or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) *Commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being ink or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act; (3) *Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (4) *Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section. This is the link to the sexual offender case:http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243 Better make dam sure. It could cost you some Court time for falsely accusing someone, and blathering it all over this board. Has Harry ever denied being a convicted child molester? Not that I've seen. Doesn't mean a thing. He has never denied being an asshole either. Or a liar. or a loser, or a racist. Wait a minute. He did deny that one.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Here's a link to a Maryland case in which a Harry Krause was found guilty by a jury of child sexual abuse: http://www.marylandfathers.org/FUERhist1990s.html. You ****ing idiot. Did you bother to read that section that states that he commited suicide? Jesus Christ you people are stupid. Get a ****ing hobby. You ****ing idiot did you read what he wrote "in which a Harry Krause..." You and your buddies sure do seem to have a major _thing_ for Harry. A gaggle of ding-a-lings with nothing better to do than try to rip at lefties who they know are far better off. Drives 'em nuts. How's your plan going for the sailboat? Making progress? No doubt. Well, we did some sailing off SF this summer. I might get invited in France. I'm working on that. :) I've also took some lessons.. just the basic stuff. We've looked at a lot of boats. For monohull, the general consensus is a Valiant. For a catamaran, a general consensus doesn't yet exist. They're also more expensive of course. But, they would do well in places like the Caribbean, and they're very popular. They also don't heel over, so that's a plus for kids, guests, frightened men.. lol I've always preferred upright in boats. Something about healing over in rough seas just doesn't do it for me. If I were a sailor, it'd be a cat. I don't know what we'll do ultimately. The Val is beautiful and from what we've found is very well made.. not cheap tho... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com