| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On 9/9/2011 10:52 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:04:37 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:33:39 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 07:46:01 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:23:19 -0600, wrote: On 08/09/2011 11:12 AM, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:21:07 -0400, wrote: You seriously believe that all costs are passed along to the consumer? All costs? Feel free to try and defend that statement. As I actually said, the "insurance claims are.. a tiny piece of the pie." Ultimately yep, all costs will be passed on to the consumer. Take oil, go ahead, slap a $90/barrel tax on oil and watch the pump prices double or more. A classic example was the massive judgement against the cigarette companies. Shortly after that Altria posted record profits. It is amazinig what business can do when they do not have an unknown hanging over their head. What unknown? Typical bull**** comment with no substance. The unknown was what future lawsuits were coming down the poke. The settlement blocked any future lawsuits so they knew what they were dealing with and what price point they had to hit to continue being profitable. So, you believe that either there should never be a lawsuit against a company (or an individual) or you believe that lawsuits should be known about in advance? Sounds like an interesting game you've got going with your crystal ball. Him with his crystal ball and you pulling crap out of your wonder bra. Youse guys are a barrel of laughs. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 02:16:36 -0400, wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:52:36 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:04:37 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:33:39 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 07:46:01 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:23:19 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 08/09/2011 11:12 AM, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:21:07 -0400, wrote: You seriously believe that all costs are passed along to the consumer? All costs? Feel free to try and defend that statement. As I actually said, the "insurance claims are.. a tiny piece of the pie." Ultimately yep, all costs will be passed on to the consumer. Take oil, go ahead, slap a $90/barrel tax on oil and watch the pump prices double or more. A classic example was the massive judgement against the cigarette companies. Shortly after that Altria posted record profits. It is amazinig what business can do when they do not have an unknown hanging over their head. What unknown? Typical bull**** comment with no substance. The unknown was what future lawsuits were coming down the poke. The settlement blocked any future lawsuits so they knew what they were dealing with and what price point they had to hit to continue being profitable. So, you believe that either there should never be a lawsuit against a company (or an individual) or you believe that lawsuits should be known about in advance? Sounds like an interesting game you've got going with your crystal ball. Read up on the tobacco suits and get back to me. So, you do believe that lawsuits (if any are allowed) should be known in advance. Interesting. Read up on fantasy and get back to me. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On 9/10/2011 2:51 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 02:16:36 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:52:36 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:04:37 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:33:39 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 07:46:01 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:23:19 -0600, wrote: On 08/09/2011 11:12 AM, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:21:07 -0400, wrote: You seriously believe that all costs are passed along to the consumer? All costs? Feel free to try and defend that statement. As I actually said, the "insurance claims are.. a tiny piece of the pie." Ultimately yep, all costs will be passed on to the consumer. Take oil, go ahead, slap a $90/barrel tax on oil and watch the pump prices double or more. A classic example was the massive judgement against the cigarette companies. Shortly after that Altria posted record profits. It is amazinig what business can do when they do not have an unknown hanging over their head. What unknown? Typical bull**** comment with no substance. The unknown was what future lawsuits were coming down the poke. The settlement blocked any future lawsuits so they knew what they were dealing with and what price point they had to hit to continue being profitable. So, you believe that either there should never be a lawsuit against a company (or an individual) or you believe that lawsuits should be known about in advance? Sounds like an interesting game you've got going with your crystal ball. Read up on the tobacco suits and get back to me. So, you do believe that lawsuits (if any are allowed) should be known in advance. Interesting. Read up on fantasy and get back to me. Comeon sweet cheeks. You and Greg are ideologically the same. Kiss and make up. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:11:30 -0400, wrote:
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:51:01 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 02:16:36 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:52:36 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:04:37 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:33:39 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 07:46:01 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:23:19 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 08/09/2011 11:12 AM, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:21:07 -0400, wrote: You seriously believe that all costs are passed along to the consumer? All costs? Feel free to try and defend that statement. As I actually said, the "insurance claims are.. a tiny piece of the pie." Ultimately yep, all costs will be passed on to the consumer. Take oil, go ahead, slap a $90/barrel tax on oil and watch the pump prices double or more. A classic example was the massive judgement against the cigarette companies. Shortly after that Altria posted record profits. It is amazinig what business can do when they do not have an unknown hanging over their head. What unknown? Typical bull**** comment with no substance. The unknown was what future lawsuits were coming down the poke. The settlement blocked any future lawsuits so they knew what they were dealing with and what price point they had to hit to continue being profitable. So, you believe that either there should never be a lawsuit against a company (or an individual) or you believe that lawsuits should be known about in advance? Sounds like an interesting game you've got going with your crystal ball. Read up on the tobacco suits and get back to me. So, you do believe that lawsuits (if any are allowed) should be known in advance. Interesting. Read up on fantasy and get back to me. The settlement was with the attorneys general of the states involved and specified that this was going to be the end of it. I am sure there might be some individual who might try to take on Altria after this but they would get ground up and spit out. The idea that anyone on the planet has not seen the warning on the side of a cigarette pack is ludicrous. Which has nothing to do with fantasy that lawsuits should be known about in advance. I suppose you consider 12 year olds cognizant of the dangers of cigar smoke also. Typical "libertarian" nonsense. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On 9/10/2011 4:10 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:11:30 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:51:01 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 02:16:36 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:52:36 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:04:37 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:33:39 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 07:46:01 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:23:19 -0600, wrote: On 08/09/2011 11:12 AM, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:21:07 -0400, wrote: You seriously believe that all costs are passed along to the consumer? All costs? Feel free to try and defend that statement. As I actually said, the "insurance claims are.. a tiny piece of the pie." Ultimately yep, all costs will be passed on to the consumer. Take oil, go ahead, slap a $90/barrel tax on oil and watch the pump prices double or more. A classic example was the massive judgement against the cigarette companies. Shortly after that Altria posted record profits. It is amazinig what business can do when they do not have an unknown hanging over their head. What unknown? Typical bull**** comment with no substance. The unknown was what future lawsuits were coming down the poke. The settlement blocked any future lawsuits so they knew what they were dealing with and what price point they had to hit to continue being profitable. So, you believe that either there should never be a lawsuit against a company (or an individual) or you believe that lawsuits should be known about in advance? Sounds like an interesting game you've got going with your crystal ball. Read up on the tobacco suits and get back to me. So, you do believe that lawsuits (if any are allowed) should be known in advance. Interesting. Read up on fantasy and get back to me. The settlement was with the attorneys general of the states involved and specified that this was going to be the end of it. I am sure there might be some individual who might try to take on Altria after this but they would get ground up and spit out. The idea that anyone on the planet has not seen the warning on the side of a cigarette pack is ludicrous. Which has nothing to do with fantasy that lawsuits should be known about in advance. I suppose you consider 12 year olds cognizant of the dangers of cigar smoke also. Typical "libertarian" nonsense. Bad example. Any 12 year old with half a brain knows the use of tobacco is harmful to your health. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 14:45:58 -0400, wrote:
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:10:10 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:11:30 -0400, wrote: Read up on fantasy and get back to me. The settlement was with the attorneys general of the states involved and specified that this was going to be the end of it. I am sure there might be some individual who might try to take on Altria after this but they would get ground up and spit out. The idea that anyone on the planet has not seen the warning on the side of a cigarette pack is ludicrous. Which has nothing to do with fantasy that lawsuits should be known about in advance. How many suits have there been since the settlement? What difference does that make? Tell me about how many lawsuits are known about in advance. I notice you keep avoiding telling me. I suppose you consider 12 year olds cognizant of the dangers of cigar smoke also. Typical "libertarian" nonsense. 12 year olds are prohibited by law from smoking. As I said, the tobacco companies don't seem to care. Also, does this mean you believe in certain gov't intrusion? I'm shocked! |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On 9/11/2011 4:38 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 14:45:58 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:10:10 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:11:30 -0400, wrote: Read up on fantasy and get back to me. The settlement was with the attorneys general of the states involved and specified that this was going to be the end of it. I am sure there might be some individual who might try to take on Altria after this but they would get ground up and spit out. The idea that anyone on the planet has not seen the warning on the side of a cigarette pack is ludicrous. Which has nothing to do with fantasy that lawsuits should be known about in advance. How many suits have there been since the settlement? What difference does that make? Tell me about how many lawsuits are known about in advance. I notice you keep avoiding telling me. I suppose you consider 12 year olds cognizant of the dangers of cigar smoke also. Typical "libertarian" nonsense. 12 year olds are prohibited by law from smoking. As I said, the tobacco companies don't seem to care. Also, does this mean you believe in certain gov't intrusion? I'm shocked! You're shocked at Greg doing a flippy floppy? Why? He has to in order to stay opposed to you. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:27:51 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:09:54 -0400, Drifter wrote: On 9/11/2011 4:38 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 14:45:58 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:10:10 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:11:30 -0400, wrote: Read up on fantasy and get back to me. The settlement was with the attorneys general of the states involved and specified that this was going to be the end of it. I am sure there might be some individual who might try to take on Altria after this but they would get ground up and spit out. The idea that anyone on the planet has not seen the warning on the side of a cigarette pack is ludicrous. Which has nothing to do with fantasy that lawsuits should be known about in advance. How many suits have there been since the settlement? What difference does that make? Tell me about how many lawsuits are known about in advance. I notice you keep avoiding telling me. I suppose you consider 12 year olds cognizant of the dangers of cigar smoke also. Typical "libertarian" nonsense. 12 year olds are prohibited by law from smoking. As I said, the tobacco companies don't seem to care. Also, does this mean you believe in certain gov't intrusion? I'm shocked! You're shocked at Greg doing a flippy floppy? Why? He has to in order to stay opposed to you. It is not necessary Plume will always disagree with anything I say. That is why it is fun playing with her. I can usually get her arguing with herself before it is over. And, I usually get you to make up some false equivalent to justify and untenable position... Example: Me: The stars are far away. You: So is my cigar. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On 9/11/2011 9:41 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:27:51 -0400, wrote: And, I usually get you to make up some false equivalent to justify and untenable position... Example: Me: The stars are far away. You: So is my cigar. My cigar LaPlume? Is that what you call it. You should take it out of tour nightstand and play with it. You talked about people going into places where they serve peanuts as an example of companies stopping service of them, as though that never happens. I pointed you to a specific example. Now, you're claiming there isn't a law about it. So? There could be a lawsuit about it, might have already been one. Feel free to do the research, since you're so dedicated. I think I'll feel good about no-smoking bans. Which one of you birds made the above comment? I want you to know that I am strictly opposed to bans on no-smoking. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| trouble for wal-mart | General | |||
| Wal-Mart...a criminal enterprise? | General | |||
| Hillary! Loyal Wal-Mart Director? | General | |||
| Big Box Mart | ASA | |||
| Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!! | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
