Thread
:
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
View Single Post
#
77
posted to rec.boats
[email protected]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 02:16:36 -0400,
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:52:36 -0700,
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:04:37 -0400,
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:33:39 -0700,
wrote:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 07:46:01 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:23:19 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:
On 08/09/2011 11:12 AM,
wrote:
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:21:07 -0400,
wrote:
You seriously believe that all costs are passed along to the consumer?
All costs? Feel free to try and defend that statement.
As I actually said, the "insurance claims are.. a tiny piece of the
pie."
Ultimately yep, all costs will be passed on to the consumer. Take oil,
go ahead, slap a $90/barrel tax on oil and watch the pump prices double
or more.
A classic example was the massive judgement against the cigarette
companies. Shortly after that Altria posted record profits.
It is amazinig what business can do when they do not have an unknown
hanging over their head.
What unknown? Typical bull**** comment with no substance.
The unknown was what future lawsuits were coming down the poke. The
settlement blocked any future lawsuits so they knew what they were
dealing with and what price point they had to hit to continue being
profitable.
So, you believe that either there should never be a lawsuit against a
company (or an individual) or you believe that lawsuits should be
known about in advance?
Sounds like an interesting game you've got going with your crystal
ball.
Read up on the tobacco suits and get back to me.
So, you do believe that lawsuits (if any are allowed) should be known
in advance. Interesting.
Read up on fantasy and get back to me.
Reply With Quote
[email protected]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by
[email protected]