Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:52:32 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:55:08 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:29:39 -0400, wrote: Maybe if the right wing would be willing to maintain our infrastructure, including funding national parks and monuments, this wouldn't have happened. The monument was restored in 1996 Clinton must have cut corners on the restoration. I guess you forgot who was in control of BOTH houses in 1996... January 3, 1995: Republicans gained control of both houses for the first time since the 1950s. Target paid for the restoration. So, we're supposed to rely on Target for our national monuments? That's what it's come to? That's what you're advocating?? Well, our government sure doesn't have the money to do it. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:25:57 -0400, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:05:53 -0400, iBoatMore wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:52:32 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:55:08 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:29:39 -0400, wrote: Maybe if the right wing would be willing to maintain our infrastructure, including funding national parks and monuments, this wouldn't have happened. The monument was restored in 1996 Clinton must have cut corners on the restoration. I guess you forgot who was in control of BOTH houses in 1996... January 3, 1995: Republicans gained control of both houses for the first time since the 1950s. Target paid for the restoration. So, we're supposed to rely on Target for our national monuments? That's what it's come to? That's what you're advocating?? Well, our government sure doesn't have the money to do it. Actually the money to completely rebuild the monument is chump change in a 3.8 trillion dollar budget. I still would not be opposed to a corporation coughing up the money. I am still not sure I want them to get naming rights. It is a natural for Viagra tho The easiest way to get a corp to do it is by ending subsidies to the ones who ship jobs overseas. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/26/11 4:45 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:25:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:05:53 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:52:32 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:55:08 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:29:39 -0400, wrote: Maybe if the right wing would be willing to maintain our infrastructure, including funding national parks and monuments, this wouldn't have happened. The monument was restored in 1996 Clinton must have cut corners on the restoration. I guess you forgot who was in control of BOTH houses in 1996... January 3, 1995: Republicans gained control of both houses for the first time since the 1950s. Target paid for the restoration. So, we're supposed to rely on Target for our national monuments? That's what it's come to? That's what you're advocating?? Well, our government sure doesn't have the money to do it. Actually the money to completely rebuild the monument is chump change in a 3.8 trillion dollar budget. I still would not be opposed to a corporation coughing up the money. I am still not sure I want them to get naming rights. It is a natural for Viagra tho The easiest way to get a corp to do it is by ending subsidies to the ones who ship jobs overseas. We can also selectively impose tariffs. General Electric, for example, used to make most of its household major appliances in the USA. Now they are made in cheap labor countries. Add a tariff to the price of each GE appliance imported equal to the difference between the cheap foreign labor costs and a family-supporting U.S. labor cost. In other words, remove the incentives for exporting jobs. -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:02:41 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: On 8/26/11 4:45 PM, wrote: On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:25:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:05:53 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:52:32 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:55:08 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:29:39 -0400, wrote: Maybe if the right wing would be willing to maintain our infrastructure, including funding national parks and monuments, this wouldn't have happened. The monument was restored in 1996 Clinton must have cut corners on the restoration. I guess you forgot who was in control of BOTH houses in 1996... January 3, 1995: Republicans gained control of both houses for the first time since the 1950s. Target paid for the restoration. So, we're supposed to rely on Target for our national monuments? That's what it's come to? That's what you're advocating?? Well, our government sure doesn't have the money to do it. Actually the money to completely rebuild the monument is chump change in a 3.8 trillion dollar budget. I still would not be opposed to a corporation coughing up the money. I am still not sure I want them to get naming rights. It is a natural for Viagra tho The easiest way to get a corp to do it is by ending subsidies to the ones who ship jobs overseas. We can also selectively impose tariffs. General Electric, for example, used to make most of its household major appliances in the USA. Now they are made in cheap labor countries. Add a tariff to the price of each GE appliance imported equal to the difference between the cheap foreign labor costs and a family-supporting U.S. labor cost. In other words, remove the incentives for exporting jobs. No, that won't work for the right. They need a chainsaw to fix a splinter. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/26/11 7:17 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:02:41 -0400, X ` wrote: On 8/26/11 4:45 PM, wrote: On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:25:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:05:53 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:52:32 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:55:08 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:29:39 -0400, wrote: Maybe if the right wing would be willing to maintain our infrastructure, including funding national parks and monuments, this wouldn't have happened. The monument was restored in 1996 Clinton must have cut corners on the restoration. I guess you forgot who was in control of BOTH houses in 1996... January 3, 1995: Republicans gained control of both houses for the first time since the 1950s. Target paid for the restoration. So, we're supposed to rely on Target for our national monuments? That's what it's come to? That's what you're advocating?? Well, our government sure doesn't have the money to do it. Actually the money to completely rebuild the monument is chump change in a 3.8 trillion dollar budget. I still would not be opposed to a corporation coughing up the money. I am still not sure I want them to get naming rights. It is a natural for Viagra tho The easiest way to get a corp to do it is by ending subsidies to the ones who ship jobs overseas. We can also selectively impose tariffs. General Electric, for example, used to make most of its household major appliances in the USA. Now they are made in cheap labor countries. Add a tariff to the price of each GE appliance imported equal to the difference between the cheap foreign labor costs and a family-supporting U.S. labor cost. In other words, remove the incentives for exporting jobs. No, that won't work for the right. They need a chainsaw to fix a splinter. The ironic thing is that even though labor is cheaper in places like China or Mexico, the high end products made there and sold here aren't any less expensive for consumers than they would be if they were made here. The only difference is that the manufacturer makes a lot more profit at the expense of Americans and American workers. -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:18:42 -0400, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 08:41:44 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:52:32 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:55:08 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:29:39 -0400, wrote: Maybe if the right wing would be willing to maintain our infrastructure, including funding national parks and monuments, this wouldn't have happened. The monument was restored in 1996 Clinton must have cut corners on the restoration. I guess you forgot who was in control of BOTH houses in 1996... January 3, 1995: Republicans gained control of both houses for the first time since the 1950s. Target paid for the restoration. So, we're supposed to rely on Target for our national monuments? That's what it's come to? That's what you're advocating?? Yes that is what it has come to. The feds spend over 40% of GDP right now, the highest in our history with the exception of the middle of WWII when we nationalized every industrial company in the US. It is simply unsustainable. Well, I don't mind spending my tax dollars on things like national monuments. Feel free to not send in your tax payments in protest. The fact is that this is absolutely the wrong time to worry about the deficit. Right now, the issue is JOBS. If it takes gov't intervention to get people jobs, that's a heck of a lot better than another recession. Taxes? They are currently collecting 43% of all of the total taxable income in the US (2,17 T of the $5t reported) and to balance the budget they would need to collect 76%. As I said, end subsidies, impose penalties on corps that ship jobs elsewhere, ask the rich to pay their fair share. That is the AGI of everyone from zero to Bill Gates. It is scary when you do the "tons of research" I get accused of doing. In real life it is just looking at the IRS database, available on the GPO web site and crunching the numbers a little. So, you don't do enough research? Well, get to it, because your research seems to be seriously flawed or you're making conclusions that aren't supported by facts. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boating! Spent the day at Lake Anna... | General | |||
Another great Lake Anna day. | General | |||
Great Day at Lake Anna, VA | General | |||
McCain Touts Nuke Power at 'China Syndrome' Plant | General | |||
why will we dine after Virginia seeks the smart lake's code | ASA |