Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama set a high bar for 2012 presidential campaign fundraising after reporting a haul of $46 million in his second quarter campaign finance filings released on Friday. The president's campaign is, yet again, relying on a mix of small-dollar donors and big-dollar bundlers to pay for a campaign that experts project will raise a total of close to $1 billion. Obama's closest competitor in the money race is former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, who raised $18 million in the second quarter. Obama's campaign pulled in 47 percent of its contributions from donors giving less than $250, an indication that the president still has the support of the donor base that drove him to victory in 2008. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/18/11 1:03 PM, jps wrote:
WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama set a high bar for 2012 presidential campaign fundraising after reporting a haul of $46 million in his second quarter campaign finance filings released on Friday. The president's campaign is, yet again, relying on a mix of small-dollar donors and big-dollar bundlers to pay for a campaign that experts project will raise a total of close to $1 billion. Obama's closest competitor in the money race is former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, who raised $18 million in the second quarter. Obama's campaign pulled in 47 percent of its contributions from donors giving less than $250, an indication that the president still has the support of the donor base that drove him to victory in 2008. Obama has also helped the DNC raise about $40 million so far. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18/07/2011 11:03 AM, jps wrote:
WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama set a high bar for 2012 presidential campaign fundraising after reporting a haul of $46 million in his second quarter campaign finance filings released on Friday. The president's campaign is, yet again, relying on a mix of small-dollar donors and big-dollar bundlers to pay for a campaign that experts project will raise a total of close to $1 billion. Obama's closest competitor in the money race is former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, who raised $18 million in the second quarter. Obama's campaign pulled in 47 percent of its contributions from donors giving less than $250, an indication that the president still has the support of the donor base that drove him to victory in 2008. Obama is going down....babababababa Obama is going down right now from debt and despair...babababababa Because he is all mouth and no action debt welsher greed pandering idiot.... -- What government fears the most is that the people correctly learn that they need government less than the government needs them. Say no more debt, no more debt-slave taxes. Economic freedom matters too! |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/18/11 4:08 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In , says... WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama set a high bar for 2012 presidential campaign fundraising after reporting a haul of $46 million in his second quarter campaign finance filings released on Friday. The president's campaign is, yet again, relying on a mix of small-dollar donors and big-dollar bundlers to pay for a campaign that experts project will raise a total of close to $1 billion. Obama's closest competitor in the money race is former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, who raised $18 million in the second quarter. Obama's campaign pulled in 47 percent of its contributions from donors giving less than $250, an indication that the president still has the support of the donor base that drove him to victory in 2008. This last paragraph is bull****. The democrats and their donors are well known for cheating on the limits and bundling... They apologize after the elections and promise not to do it again... What's bull**** is your made-up, paranoid "takes" on things political. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:16:38 -0400, Harryk
wrote: On 7/18/11 4:08 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama set a high bar for 2012 presidential campaign fundraising after reporting a haul of $46 million in his second quarter campaign finance filings released on Friday. The president's campaign is, yet again, relying on a mix of small-dollar donors and big-dollar bundlers to pay for a campaign that experts project will raise a total of close to $1 billion. Obama's closest competitor in the money race is former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, who raised $18 million in the second quarter. Obama's campaign pulled in 47 percent of its contributions from donors giving less than $250, an indication that the president still has the support of the donor base that drove him to victory in 2008. This last paragraph is bull****. The democrats and their donors are well known for cheating on the limits and bundling... They apologize after the elections and promise not to do it again... What's bull**** is your made-up, paranoid "takes" on things political. As usual, Canook talks from his ass... Here's the rest of the article: This doesn't mean that the Obama campaign is shunning big money. The campaign also relied on a stable of 244 bundlers, donors who collect checks to deliver to the campaign. Those bundlers delivered at least $37 million, according to campaign's report of the minimum amount each bundler produced. This total was for both the Obama campaign and the Obama Victory Fund, a joint fundraising vehicle, according to campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt. The campaign also relied on a joint fundraising vehicle that forwarded $20.5 million to the Democratic National Committee and $12.75 million to Obama for America. The Obama Victory Fund raised more than 50 percent of its total from donors maxing out at $35,800 and more than 90 percent from donors giving $10,000. According to a HuffPost analysis of the campaign's money, no single company or institution emerged as a big source of donations for the Obama campaign. In 2008, the campaign raised $1.5 million from employees of the University of California, $994,795 from Goldman Sachs employees, $854,747 from Harvard employees, $833,617 from Microsoft employees, and $803,436 from Google employees, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. This time around, the campaign has not yet raised more than $100,000 from the employees of any single company or institution. The 2012 campaign with the second biggest quarterly haul, that of Mitt Romney, is currently tapping only the institutional, big-donor money while failing to raise money from small-dollar donors. Romney's primary campaign raised only 6 percent of its total money, or $1.1 million, from donors giving less than $250. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), by comparison, raised 66 percent of her total haul of $1.6 million from small-dollar donors. See that? Romney pulled in 6% of his donations from donors of $250 or less vs. 47% from Obama donors. He's still got grassroots support and will easily win re-election. Who's going to be the R's candidate? Bachmann and/or Herman Cain? ****ing joke. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18/07/2011 2:43 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:16:38 -0400, wrote: On 7/18/11 4:08 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama set a high bar for 2012 presidential campaign fundraising after reporting a haul of $46 million in his second quarter campaign finance filings released on Friday. The president's campaign is, yet again, relying on a mix of small-dollar donors and big-dollar bundlers to pay for a campaign that experts project will raise a total of close to $1 billion. Obama's closest competitor in the money race is former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, who raised $18 million in the second quarter. Obama's campaign pulled in 47 percent of its contributions from donors giving less than $250, an indication that the president still has the support of the donor base that drove him to victory in 2008. This last paragraph is bull****. The democrats and their donors are well known for cheating on the limits and bundling... They apologize after the elections and promise not to do it again... What's bull**** is your made-up, paranoid "takes" on things political. As usual, Canook talks from his ass... Here's the rest of the article: This doesn't mean that the Obama campaign is shunning big money. The campaign also relied on a stable of 244 bundlers, donors who collect checks to deliver to the campaign. Those bundlers delivered at least $37 million, according to campaign's report of the minimum amount each bundler produced. This total was for both the Obama campaign and the Obama Victory Fund, a joint fundraising vehicle, according to campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt. The campaign also relied on a joint fundraising vehicle that forwarded $20.5 million to the Democratic National Committee and $12.75 million to Obama for America. The Obama Victory Fund raised more than 50 percent of its total from donors maxing out at $35,800 and more than 90 percent from donors giving $10,000. According to a HuffPost analysis of the campaign's money, no single company or institution emerged as a big source of donations for the Obama campaign. In 2008, the campaign raised $1.5 million from employees of the University of California, $994,795 from Goldman Sachs employees, $854,747 from Harvard employees, $833,617 from Microsoft employees, and $803,436 from Google employees, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. This time around, the campaign has not yet raised more than $100,000 from the employees of any single company or institution. The 2012 campaign with the second biggest quarterly haul, that of Mitt Romney, is currently tapping only the institutional, big-donor money while failing to raise money from small-dollar donors. Romney's primary campaign raised only 6 percent of its total money, or $1.1 million, from donors giving less than $250. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), by comparison, raised 66 percent of her total haul of $1.6 million from small-dollar donors. See that? Romney pulled in 6% of his donations from donors of $250 or less vs. 47% from Obama donors. He's still got grassroots support and will easily win re-election. Who's going to be the R's candidate? Bachmann and/or Herman Cain? ****ing joke. ****ing joke is Americans saddled with debt-tax slavery. Worse thing anyone ever did was give government the ability to borrow money and the second worst thing is letting a fleabag like Bernanke print no value counterfeit money. All of which is criminal fraud that Obma supports and endorses. -- What government fears the most is that the people correctly learn that they need government less than the government needs them. Say no more debt, no more debt-slave taxes. Economic freedom matters too! |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:18:41 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 18/07/2011 11:03 AM, jps wrote: WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama set a high bar for 2012 presidential campaign fundraising after reporting a haul of $46 million in his second quarter campaign finance filings released on Friday. The president's campaign is, yet again, relying on a mix of small-dollar donors and big-dollar bundlers to pay for a campaign that experts project will raise a total of close to $1 billion. Obama's closest competitor in the money race is former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, who raised $18 million in the second quarter. Obama's campaign pulled in 47 percent of its contributions from donors giving less than $250, an indication that the president still has the support of the donor base that drove him to victory in 2008. Obama is going down....babababababa Obama is going down right now from debt and despair...babababababa Because he is all mouth and no action debt welsher greed pandering idiot.... You might want to rethink your call for people to "go down" with all mouth. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:54:26 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 18/07/2011 2:43 PM, jps wrote: On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:16:38 -0400, wrote: On 7/18/11 4:08 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama set a high bar for 2012 presidential campaign fundraising after reporting a haul of $46 million in his second quarter campaign finance filings released on Friday. The president's campaign is, yet again, relying on a mix of small-dollar donors and big-dollar bundlers to pay for a campaign that experts project will raise a total of close to $1 billion. Obama's closest competitor in the money race is former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, who raised $18 million in the second quarter. Obama's campaign pulled in 47 percent of its contributions from donors giving less than $250, an indication that the president still has the support of the donor base that drove him to victory in 2008. This last paragraph is bull****. The democrats and their donors are well known for cheating on the limits and bundling... They apologize after the elections and promise not to do it again... What's bull**** is your made-up, paranoid "takes" on things political. As usual, Canook talks from his ass... Here's the rest of the article: This doesn't mean that the Obama campaign is shunning big money. The campaign also relied on a stable of 244 bundlers, donors who collect checks to deliver to the campaign. Those bundlers delivered at least $37 million, according to campaign's report of the minimum amount each bundler produced. This total was for both the Obama campaign and the Obama Victory Fund, a joint fundraising vehicle, according to campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt. The campaign also relied on a joint fundraising vehicle that forwarded $20.5 million to the Democratic National Committee and $12.75 million to Obama for America. The Obama Victory Fund raised more than 50 percent of its total from donors maxing out at $35,800 and more than 90 percent from donors giving $10,000. According to a HuffPost analysis of the campaign's money, no single company or institution emerged as a big source of donations for the Obama campaign. In 2008, the campaign raised $1.5 million from employees of the University of California, $994,795 from Goldman Sachs employees, $854,747 from Harvard employees, $833,617 from Microsoft employees, and $803,436 from Google employees, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. This time around, the campaign has not yet raised more than $100,000 from the employees of any single company or institution. The 2012 campaign with the second biggest quarterly haul, that of Mitt Romney, is currently tapping only the institutional, big-donor money while failing to raise money from small-dollar donors. Romney's primary campaign raised only 6 percent of its total money, or $1.1 million, from donors giving less than $250. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), by comparison, raised 66 percent of her total haul of $1.6 million from small-dollar donors. See that? Romney pulled in 6% of his donations from donors of $250 or less vs. 47% from Obama donors. He's still got grassroots support and will easily win re-election. Who's going to be the R's candidate? Bachmann and/or Herman Cain? ****ing joke. ****ing joke is Americans saddled with debt-tax slavery. Worse thing anyone ever did was give government the ability to borrow money and the second worst thing is letting a fleabag like Bernanke print no value counterfeit money. All of which is criminal fraud that Obma supports and endorses. You're the joke. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT bad news for most - good news for Harry | General | |||
Ole Thom; Bad News/Good News | ASA | |||
Good news for America is bad news for the Democrats | ASA | |||
More bad news for Bush, good news for Americans | General | |||
Good news-Bad news | ASA |