If you were paying attention I was refering to his rational contribution to
the discussion about artificial whitewater parks not the endless discussion
about sponsons. One way to promote change is to provide positive
reinforcement when someone acts civil. Just because I thought his stubborn
and irrational approach to discussing sponsons was a pain in the ass doesn't
mean I think the guy should be black-listed if he is willing to post
rational discussion about other topics.

pete

"Michael Daly" wrote in message
able.rogers.com...
On 8-Oct-2003, "peteg" wrote:

he contributed a
rational post to the discussion here. Nothing wrong with that.

He doesn't know the difference between flotation bags and
sponsons and doesn't know what a Pungo is (DAGS), but feels
free to answer anyway. Rational posting?

Mike