Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Natural Rivers (or not) - Pine, Upper manistee
Interesting point, but if you want natural rivers go to Alaska, not Michigan
or anywhere in the Midwest. We can not alter our environment to meet the emotional needs of a few elitists. "Bill Tuthill" wrote in message ... In rec.boats.paddle stone wrote: Walt ) wrote; A week ago two rivers in the northern lower peninusila of Michigan were designated as Natural Rivers under the 1970 Michigan Natural Rivers act. This action protects the scenic quality of the Pine and Upper Manistee Rivers, preserving their natural character. So far, so good. Now the legislature is trying to undo that designation and gut the Natural Rivers act. Not so good. Public hearings are 24 Sept 2003. There are no natural rivers any more in Michigan. All have been altered by man to some degree, logging, navigation, farming, industrial, etc. Why do we insist on calling stuff by inappropriate names? Its like claiming we have "wilderness" in Michigan. What nonsense! Wilderness is a state of mind, and can exist in very small patches. Like beavers and other animals that modify rivers, man (and woman!) are part of nature. A Wild & Scenic river, or a Natural River, is one that hasn't (yet) been turned into a reservoir. That's all we want. There are enough reservoirs already, at least where I live. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Natural Rivers (or not) - Pine, Upper manistee
"stone" wrote in message ... Interesting point, but if you want natural rivers go to Alaska, not Michigan or anywhere in the Midwest. We can not alter our environment to meet the emotional needs of a few elitists. You need not travel so far. Just cross the border into Canada and drive to the North Shore of Lake Superior. Lots of very good natural rivers. Jim Carter "The Boat" Bayfield |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Natural Rivers (or not) - Pine, Upper manistee
"Jim Carter" wrote in message le.rogers.com... "stone" wrote in message ... Interesting point, but if you want natural rivers go to Alaska, not Michigan or anywhere in the Midwest. We can not alter our environment to meet the emotional needs of a few elitists. You need not travel so far. Just cross the border into Canada and drive to the North Shore of Lake Superior. Lots of very good natural rivers. ================= And very good paddling too! Pukashwa, White, Dog, Steel.... rick etter Canoe North http://www.bright.net/~retter/ Jim Carter "The Boat" Bayfield |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Natural Rivers (or not) - Pine, Upper manistee
In article ,
"stone" wrote: Interesting point, but if you want natural rivers go to Alaska, not Michigan or anywhere in the Midwest. We can not alter our environment to meet the emotional needs of a few elitists. Which elitists would that be? Dave |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Natural Rivers (or not) - Pine, Upper manistee
The ones that think there is wilderness in the lower 48, that push for
rewriting the National Park general management plans to limit access for the public unless you are a backpacker, that pushed private boats out of Isle Royale (America's only "maritime" park) so "wilderness" backpackers could enjoy themselves without seeing a, heaven forbid "boat", that are working to add "wilderness" to the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore and Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, that denigrate people over animals, I can rattle on and on, but you miscreants know who you are......that will not allow logging but instead let our forests become tinder dry only to go up in flames because they hate timber men, etc...... you know a good rant is good for the soul..... "Dave Moorman" wrote in message ... In article , "stone" wrote: Interesting point, but if you want natural rivers go to Alaska, not Michigan or anywhere in the Midwest. We can not alter our environment to meet the emotional needs of a few elitists. Which elitists would that be? Dave |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Natural Rivers (or not) - Pine, Upper manistee
In the previous article, stone wrote: The ones that think there is wilderness in the lower 48, that push for rewriting the National Park general management plans to limit access for the public unless you are a backpacker, that pushed private boats out of Isle Royale (America's only "maritime" park) [...] Huh? Off the top of my head I can think of Channel Islands (national) and Hanauma Bay (state) parks. -- _+_ From the catapult of |If anyone disagrees with any statement I make, I _|70|___=}- J.D. Baldwin |am quite prepared not only to retract it, but also \ / |to deny under oath that I ever made it. -T. Lehrer ***~~~~----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Natural Rivers (or not) - Pine, Upper manistee
"J.D. Baldwin" wrote:
In the previous article, stone wrote: The ones that think there is wilderness in the lower 48, that push for rewriting the National Park general management plans to limit access for the public unless you are a backpacker, that pushed private boats out of Isle Royale (America's only "maritime" park) [...] Huh? Off the top of my head I can think of Channel Islands (national) and Hanauma Bay (state) parks. Stone is full of misinformation. The general management plan did not push private boats out of Isle Royal. It does attempt to separate the backpackers/kayakers from the motorboats, so that someone who spent three days hiking or paddling to a remote campsite doesn't have to put up with someone docking their cabin cruiser 100' away and running the generator all night. The plan was approved three or four years ago, and you can still take your boat to Isle Royale. And as you correctly point out, Isle Royale is hardly America's only maritime park. -- //-Walt // // |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Natural Rivers (or not) - Pine, Upper manistee
Yep, that's right on the money. Folks in the Midwest don't need solitude,
clean water or beauty. They don't need to feel a delicate wind in the pines, while looking down a ribbon of water. They don't need to see pintails on the water, or a heron in the rushes. They have Walmart, stocked full of worthless crap made by slaves in a far-away land where they don't have to bear witness to the consequences of their actions. They have Pizza Hut, and McDonalds on every intersection, and can fatten themselves by the day at an endless fountain of high-fructose corn syrup-charged pop. No, you're right-- people in the Midwest don't need wild rivers. They've already got it all. Chuck http://www.wildcountry.info in article , stone at wrote on 9/28/03 6:34 AM: Interesting point, but if you want natural rivers go to Alaska, not Michigan or anywhere in the Midwest. We can not alter our environment to meet the emotional needs of a few elitists. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Natural Rivers (or not) - Pine, Upper manistee
Wow, you are as bitter and rabid about "wilderness" and "wild rivers" as I
am...just on the other side of the stream! But on a more conciliatory tone, if they want wild things, they need to go where they are not try to "restore virginity" here.... "Charles Pezeshki" wrote in message ... Yep, that's right on the money. Folks in the Midwest don't need solitude, clean water or beauty. They don't need to feel a delicate wind in the pines, while looking down a ribbon of water. They don't need to see pintails on the water, or a heron in the rushes. They have Walmart, stocked full of worthless crap made by slaves in a far-away land where they don't have to bear witness to the consequences of their actions. They have Pizza Hut, and McDonalds on every intersection, and can fatten themselves by the day at an endless fountain of high-fructose corn syrup-charged pop. No, you're right-- people in the Midwest don't need wild rivers. They've already got it all. Chuck http://www.wildcountry.info in article , stone at wrote on 9/28/03 6:34 AM: Interesting point, but if you want natural rivers go to Alaska, not Michigan or anywhere in the Midwest. We can not alter our environment to meet the emotional needs of a few elitists. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Natural Rivers (or not) - Pine, Upper manistee
"stone" typed:
Wow, you are as bitter and rabid about "wilderness" and "wild rivers" as I am...just on the other side of the stream! But on a more conciliatory tone, if they want wild things, they need to go where they are not try to "restore virginity" here.... Yeh, but... If everyone who wants a wilderness goes to the same relatively small area where true wilderness exists, there will be so many people that the true wilderness will CEASE to exist there. How much better to try and restore enough lands in the lower 48 to enough of a semblance of "wilderness" to meet the needs of outdoorspeople, so that the resources will not exceed their carrying capacities and cease to resemble "wilderness"? If people want more Chevys, GM makes more Chevys. So, if people want more wilderness -- or, at least, something like "wilderness" -- why should we not make more "wilderness"? Some heal their souls by walking in urban parks. Some heal their souls by driving in farm country. Some heal their souls by hiking in crowded National Parks. Some heal their souls by backpacking in "restore[d] [non-]virgin" woodlands. Would you argue against the creation of enough urban parks to fulfill the demand? Would you argue against the creation of more National Parks, to reduce crowding and enhance the experience of visiting? If some people can fill their need for [perceived] wilderness by spending time in restored non-virgin woodlands, why would you deny them that? If restoring non-virgin woodlands to some semblance of wilderness is the best we can do with what we have left, why would you resist the attempt to do the best we can? Is there anything more elitist than to say that only those with the time and money to go to Alaska should be permitted to enjoy primitive camping in what appears to be a natural environment? You set up a false dichotomy when you say environmentalists are against people, in favor of animals. Jeez, we can have BOTH! You set up a REALLY false dichotomy when you say environmentalists hate loggers. The timber companies have put more loggers out of work, with "productivity gains" from ever more-destructive mechanized logging, than environmental and conservation movements ever have (not to mention putting all the millworkers out of work by shipping the milling overseas). These false dichotomys have you fighting people who really want the same thing you want: a beautiful United States to live in. -Richard, His Kanubic Travesty -- ================================================== ==================== Richard Hopley, Winston-Salem, NC, USA rhopley[at]earthlink[dot]net 1-301-775-0471 Nothing really matters except Boats, Sex, and Rock'n'Roll. rhopley[at]wfubmc[dot]edu 1-336-713-5077 OK, OK; computer programming for scientific research also matters. ================================================== ==================== |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
River Grades - Rafts vs Kayaks | General | |||
Survey - How many rivers/new rivers? | General |