|
2nd Kook Seeks GOP Nomination
|
2nd Kook Seeks GOP Nomination
|
2nd Kook Seeks GOP Nomination
On 14/05/2011 11:29 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2011 23:56:39 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 14 May 2011 23:40:18 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 14 May 2011 21:32:43 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 14 May 2011 17:14:09 -0400, wrote: If you are a big business, Wall Street, insurance company, medical conglomerate, neocon war mongering kind of republican you have to love Obama. So far he is GW Bush with a tan. (the 5th Bush Brother) let's see... obama proposed a single payer system that would put the insurance companies out of business Yet he brags about a system that did little but bring another 40 million customers to the same insurance companies that you hate at the point of a government gun uh wrong 1. he gives a subsidy to low income earners to buy insurance 2. he removes the policy of excluding pre existing conditions if he'd had his way our healthcare system would be more efficient. but folks like you objected because it didnt make the rich richer Uh what part of what I said was wrong. Where did those 40 million have to go? To the same insurance companies who still really have no limits to what they charge. All we did was put the government in the position of having to borrow money to pay for it. This is a "mandate", in other words the government makes you go to those insurance companies. Before you say it, yes they capped overhead at 20% but the worst case estimate before the law was that they had a 17% overhead. They got a 17.6% raise. . Exactly ZERO republicans voted for that bill or had anything to do with writing it. It was democrats in the senate that killed single payer. lotsa right wing democrats Then look inside your party. That is my point obama proposed strong regulations on wall street Yet the democratic senate came up with a fin reg bill that left most of the abuses like too big to fail in place. Maybe it was because they took more money from Wall Street than the republicans did. actually the dems didnt. in the last election, 80% of wall street money went to the GOP Cite that. I see this http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=F07 you gotta keep up with the news if you're gonna argue facts oh. i forgot. you're right wing you dont do facts You seem to be the one who pulls numbers out of your ass. and the GOP fought the regulations against wall street. in fact the GOP fought ANY regulations. The Democrats had a filibuster proof senate, the house and the White House. Why didn't they do something? Oh it was YOUR right wing democrats. obama is getting us out of iraq On the Bush schedule ... if he can actually pull it off. I will believe it when I see it. HAHAHA uh bush didnt HAVE a schedule. guess you just pulled THAT one out of your....ahem... Maybe you were in a cave but there was a schedule, the same one we are currently on. He doubled down in Afghanistan gee. wonder why that was now let's see...how many islamists terrorirsts in iraq? oh. zero Having nothing to do with the double down in Afghanistan. There were less than 150 terrorist suspects in Afghanistan and we sent 150,000 guys in after them. and there doesn't seem to be any end to that war on the horizon, even though the excuse we went there is at the bottom of the Indian Ocean right now. He wasn't even in Afghanistan and hasn't been there for at least 5 years. ah. no end to the war? gee. he's said 2014 and he's making it happen. I hope that is right but I doubt we will be out of either place by 2014 unless we elect an anti-war president. bush never got close and you're just not bright enough to understand why we're fighting the taliban you're just not very bright at all Insults do not enhance the credibility of your argument. The fact is there are more Taliban now than there were in 2002 but the vast majority of them have no interest in attacking the US, they just want us out of their country, just like they wanted the Soviets out. We somehow feel the need and the right to impose our culture on them and they don't like it. Well, in order to have less Taliban, you have to be prepared to kill them. Or like cockroaches they can become a bigger problem. I do think it best to leave, but after building a monument our of concrete. It will read. "Live in peace, do what you want inside your borders and we will ignore your barbarism. But take your problems to us again, this will be ground zero." Put it right in-front of their capital buildings. And if they ause trouble in the future, including frug trade, nuke'em. No need to spread American and Canadian blood for a barbaric culture. -- Take a look at ANY country, more debt is more problems. So why do we allow our governments more debt? Selfishness, greed, denial, ignorance? |
2nd Kook Seeks GOP Nomination
On 15/05/2011 4:46 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 01:29:52 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 14 May 2011 23:56:39 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 14 May 2011 23:40:18 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 14 May 2011 21:32:43 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 14 May 2011 17:14:09 -0400, wrote: If you are a big business, Wall Street, insurance company, medical conglomerate, neocon war mongering kind of republican you have to love Obama. So far he is GW Bush with a tan. (the 5th Bush Brother) let's see... obama proposed a single payer system that would put the insurance companies out of business Yet he brags about a system that did little but bring another 40 million customers to the same insurance companies that you hate at the point of a government gun uh wrong 1. he gives a subsidy to low income earners to buy insurance 2. he removes the policy of excluding pre existing conditions if he'd had his way our healthcare system would be more efficient. but folks like you objected because it didnt make the rich richer Uh what part of what I said was wrong. Where did those 40 million have to go? To the same insurance companies who still really have no limits to what they charge. All we did was put the government in the position of having to borrow money to pay for it. we were already borrowing the money. or they were. someone was paying. this delusion on the part of the right that healthcare is free is another of your urban myths This is a "mandate", in other words the government makes you go to those insurance companies. we already have mandates. i have no kids. but i have to pay higher taxes than those who do. that's a mandate. this is another urban myth of the right. you guys build your entire ideology on myths . Exactly ZERO republicans voted for that bill or had anything to do with writing it. It was democrats in the senate that killed single payer. lotsa right wing democrats Then look inside your party. That is my point the fact that the right has turned america into a plutocracy where only the rich have a voice is something that is finally dawning even on the myth loving right wing obama proposed strong regulations on wall street Yet the democratic senate came up with a fin reg bill that left most of the abuses like too big to fail in place. Maybe it was because they took more money from Wall Street than the republicans did. actually the dems didnt. in the last election, 80% of wall street money went to the GOP Cite that. I see this http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=F07 sorry. part of your myth making is that you dont pay attention to the news http://gothamist.com/2010/02/08/wall...ates_to_re.php http://mydd.com/2010/2/24/wall-streee you gotta keep up with the news if you're gonna argue facts oh. i forgot. you're right wing you dont do facts You seem to be the one who pulls numbers out of your ass. go ahead. read the news, right winger. then whimper away to lick your wounds if you were an adult and had the facts at your fingertips you'd hunt right wingers with dogs and pitchforks the fact is the right thinks everything is OK with america because the wealthy are getting richer and power is concentrating in the hands of a few progressives look at the EVIDENCE and see LACK of opportunity in a system increasing dominated by a small class of people and want to RESTORE american opportunity. that's why the right hates teh middle class, unions and progressives. WE want to RESTORE american greatness. YOU are the agents of the status quo. and the GOP fought the regulations against wall street. in fact the GOP fought ANY regulations. The Democrats had a filibuster proof senate, the house and the White House. Why didn't they do something? Oh it was YOUR right wing democrats. well no they didnt. in fact the GOP racked up MORE filibusters and threats than in any time in our nation's history. again your belief in myth is what makes you right wing http://newsjunkiepost.com/2010/03/02...f-filibusters/ obama is getting us out of iraq On the Bush schedule ... if he can actually pull it off. I will believe it when I see it. HAHAHA uh bush didnt HAVE a schedule. guess you just pulled THAT one out of your....ahem... Maybe you were in a cave but there was a schedule, the same one we are currently on.. uh no. sorry. more mythology. we will leave. obama said, when it's PRUDENT to do so and iraq? a TRILLION spent there by the liar bush. 4400 US troops between bush's WARS and his SPENDING and his TAX CUTS for the RICH HE bankrupted us, NOT the black guy sorry, right winger. the facts destroy your belief in MYTH He doubled down in Afghanistan gee. wonder why that was now let's see...how many islamists terrorirsts in iraq? oh. zero Having nothing to do with the double down in Afghanistan. There were less than 150 terrorist suspects in Afghanistan and we sent 150,000 guys in after them. HAHAHAHA this guy thinks that ONLY al qaida are terrorists!! the FACT is the HAQQANI NETWORK of the PAKISTAN TALIBAN maintains CLOSE relationships with the AFGHAN taliban AND with AL QAIDA ****, you dont even know who the terrorists are! there are LOTS of taliban groups. you're just uneducated. no wonder you're right wing! bush never got close and you're just not bright enough to understand why we're fighting the taliban you're just not very bright at all Insults do not enhance the credibility of your argument. The fact is there are more Taliban now than there were in 2002 but the vast majority of them have no interest in attacking the US, they just want us out of their country, just like they wanted the Soviets out. We somehow feel the need and the right to impose our culture on them and they don't like it. so the right hates obama so much they believe our ENEMIES I WAS IN NY after 9/11 with the USCG. i saw what they did. i saw what the TALIBAN and their allies, al qaida did mayby you right wingers, with your fundamentalist devotion to increasing the power of the rich will ally yourselves with our enemies but i never, never, will. either the taliban agree NEVER to ally with al qaida and other enemies again, or we destroy them YOU want to appease them tell it to czechoslovakia Easier to stop screwing around, 10 years is far too long. Just annihilate them like too many rats in a NY subway sewer. -- Take a look at ANY country, more debt is more problems. So why do we allow our governments more debt? Selfishness, greed, denial, ignorance? |
2nd Kook Seeks GOP Nomination
On 14/05/2011 11:37 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2011 23:56:39 -0400, wrote: Yet the democratic senate came up with a fin reg bill that left most of the abuses like too big to fail in place. Maybe it was because they took more money from Wall Street than the republicans did. actually the dems didnt. in the last election, 80% of wall street money went to the GOP BTW 2008 was even more of a slam dunk for the democrats. I suppose that is why the bailout went the way it did http://www.opensecrets.org/bigpictur...Rep&Cycle=2008 Wow, great list. Shows the union corruption. -- Take a look at ANY country, more debt is more problems. So why do we allow our governments more debt? Selfishness, greed, denial, ignorance? |
2nd Kook Seeks GOP Nomination
On 14/05/2011 7:36 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2011 14:26:34 -0600, wrote: On 14/05/2011 1:00 PM, wf3h wrote: On Sat, 14 May 2011 14:36:15 -0400, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... On Sat, 14 May 2011 04:01:03 -0400, wrote: were reagan and bush liberals? they were the biggest spenders in US history They certainly were not fiscal conservatives And they weren't the biggest spenders in history. President Obams passed them in the first year! wrong. bush's last budget had a deficit of 1.2 TRILLION. So was Bush signing the checks while Obama was in office? yep. the checks had already been signed. that's what happens when you pass a budget you dont know anything about the US political process but he's white...so we can't blame him So is Obama being black an excuse or a reason? you tell me. you're the kluxer So is that an unemployable black panther fleabagger talk? -- Take a look at ANY country, more debt is more problems. So why do we allow our governments more debt? Selfishness, greed, denial, ignorance? |
Anybody but Obama, 2012!!
On 14/05/2011 7:27 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2011 14:36:02 -0600, wrote: On 14/05/2011 12:55 PM, wf3h wrote: On Sat, 14 May 2011 14:34:44 -0400, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... uh...it was OBAMA who started the depression...oh...hold on...it was bush yeah i can see why you think BHO is a failure It was President Bush that told us he wanted to keep gas prices high to feed General Electric, oh wait, that was President Obama... actually he didnt but it's nice of you to try a brazen lie...typical of the right It was President Bush's advisor who said "never let a good disaster go to waste" (in reference to the gulf coast oil spill, oh wait, that was President Obama's aide. ah. an aide. and what did the right say about obama? he was being too hard on BP! they insisted he apologize to the poor, innocent oil company obama shakes the hand of an arab leader and they're OUTRAGED bush MURDERS US troops and they shrug their shoulder and ask how it benefits the rich Hey, I don't argue Bush bowed to Saudi/Arabs.... but so does Obama, golden handshake and Muslim bow to his Imam. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEUif1--r38 gee. bush destroyed the economy but the right focuse on obama's greeting habits shows you why america's ****ed Pick someone decent and honest, like Ron Paul. If you want real GOOD change, better find someone that does not profess big huge ever ineffective government tyrants. HAHAHAHA paul honest? I used to live in the galveston area. the man's a certifiable kluxer from way back Hey racist black supremacist, why don't you get a job? Too many times in jail? McJobs for you buddy, toilet duties. Suitable for your dysfunctional attitude. A born loser. -- Take a look at ANY country, more debt is more problems. So why do we allow our governments more debt? Selfishness, greed, denial, ignorance? |
Anybody but Obama, 2012!!
On 14/05/2011 7:29 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2011 14:31:31 -0600, wrote: Amazing how fleabaggers support statism and big fat government. let's see...we have rick santorum, darling of the right, talking about how we need 'collective' morality that focuses on god's morality and the right says that's fine. but let the middle class get uppity and the right has hysterical fits Yet fail to realize government benefits greatly from high fuel costs, more taxes. Stupid sheep vote for the very thing they complain about. yep, the right does it every time socialize the risk. privatize the rewards Only because you voted for it fleabagger. You know, you should marry defumer as you have so much in common. You could whine each other to sleep. -- Take a look at ANY country, more debt is more problems. So why do we allow our governments more debt? Selfishness, greed, denial, ignorance? |
2nd Kook Seeks GOP Nomination
On 15/05/2011 11:47 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 13:35:46 -0400, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... On Sun, 15 May 2011 13:07:29 -0400, wrote: gee. there are millions of dems. liberals are 21% of the country. right wingers? about DOUBLE that THAT is why this country is bankrupt The numbers are skewed because dishonest democrats are embarrassed to call themselves, "liberals" and dead dog ideologues like yourself JPS and Harry, think they are middle of the road.snerk ah the 'no true scotsman' fallacy heard from. hell i'm a liberal. i'm not ashamed of it because it means i love my country while the right views the US as a big piggybank. No, you are a selfish mindless greedy *******. And I don't mind telling you. You vote for more debt and government you can't afford, which you will never pay for. You openly support Obama-debt that will screw up your grandkids future with your debt-taxes because you are a selfish welfare prick today. You have excuses, you envy like a leach, your basically a pathetic racist fool. -- Take a look at ANY country, more debt is more problems. So why do we allow our governments more debt? Selfishness, greed, denial, ignorance? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com