|
2nd Kook Seeks GOP Nomination
|
2nd Kook Seeks GOP Nomination
In article , naled24511
@mypacks.net says... True North wrote: "I_am_Tosk" wrote in message ... You call the tin hat, hyperbole you spew here a "response".. You are bat**** crazy... You think the little turd can still get a woody? And, if he did, would it be noticeable? :) BOO, you coward. |
2nd Kook Seeks GOP Nomination
On Mon, 16 May 2011 12:17:14 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:05:20 -0700, wrote: SS/Medicare would be broke, no matter what happened to the economy. There simply are not enough workers coming onto the bottom of the pyramid to support an 83 million person peak. This is completely untrue. Neither is broke and this is just a right wing talking point without merit. That is just denial. Any program that pays out more than it takes in is doomed to fail No. You're wrong. Many programs "pay out" more than they take in for some period of time and they do fine in the long run. You're the one in denial. You started out with 35 or 40 payers per retiree in 1935 and people were only expected to collect for a couple of years if they lived that long. Now we have 3 workers per retiree and they will collect for 18 years. It is simply unsustainable. The whole concept of a trust fund is fantasy, invented in 1939 to fund the build up for WWII. what's also unsustainable is the massive increase in healthcare costs we face, again, engineered by the 'free market' fundamentalism of the right. Health care cost is part of it but simply having 40 million medicare recipients is unsustainable and that will double in a decade. It's only unsustainable if no action is taken. Action is being proposed and the situation will turn around. More fear mongering isn't part of the solution. Do you have a 1.5 trillion dollar idea to fix the deficit. That is really what we are talking about here and it is not a long term problem it is a problem today. Medicare/SS are just another part of the deficit now since both are running in the red. I suggested several ways to start. We DON'T NEED TO FIX THIS TOMORROW. We need to get started... subsidies, military, tax rates. I know you don't like it and would prefer to think all is lost and the sky is falling. It isn't. BTW did you see how Geithner is extending the debt ceiling? He is taking money from the federal pension program. I am surprised nobody is raising hell about that. we have no choice but to extend the ceiling. our debt wouldnt be serviceable if we didnt The debt will be unserviceable when the interest rate doubles too and that is far more than likely. It is not "more likely." There's no credible evidence that interest rates will be doubling any time soon. More denial. At this point we are only paying 0.3% on our short bonds. That is not likely to continue very long. To think a fraction of a percent rate hike is impossible it just lunacy. Right now investors are not even covering the drop in the value of the dollar we pay them back with. There is NO EVIDENCE of a dramatic increase in interest rates. Total nonsense. |
2nd Kook Seeks GOP Nomination
On Mon, 16 May 2011 12:25:08 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:06:58 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2011 00:25:41 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2011 21:18:29 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: The fact is there are more Taliban now than there were in 2002 but the vast majority of them have no interest in attacking the US, they just want us out of their country, just like they wanted the Soviets out. We somehow feel the need and the right to impose our culture on them and they don't like it. Well, in order to have less Taliban, you have to be prepared to kill them. Or like cockroaches they can become a bigger problem. I do think it best to leave, but after building a monument our of concrete. It will read. "Live in peace, do what you want inside your borders and we will ignore your barbarism. But take your problems to us again, this will be ground zero." Put it right in-front of their capital buildings. And if they ause trouble in the future, including frug trade, nuke'em. No need to spread American and Canadian blood for a barbaric culture. The point is the Taliban don't really care about us one way or the other., If we get out they will chug along in their 10th century world without giving us a second thought. We are fighting their birth rate and we will never kill them all. The taliban are against the drug trade, if that is your issue. The drugs come from the people we support. You're wrong. They will harbor terrorists, such as bin laden if we don't make that unsustainable for them. We're in the process of doing that in Afg. We don't need to "kill them all." More nonsense. We have no real evidence that 150,000 troops on the ground is doing much to change anything. All we have proved is if you have enough people there we can drive the support underground. This is another unsustainable program that we will eventually stop. The only question is when. A month after we leave the Taliban will be back with the propaganda advantage of being able to point out how many friends and neighbors the evil Americans killed. We are making them stronger, not weaker. Hmm... well, we have Bob Gates saying it on 60 minutes, but I guess you know more than he does. |
2nd Kook Seeks GOP Nomination
On Mon, 16 May 2011 12:26:09 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:09:40 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:56:48 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2011 13:09:46 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Have you ever googled Santorum? ;-) Yes. And that's as sick as Santorum. Just shows how low we are. All poison, little common sense. That was actually Savage and his gay mafia that google bombed Santorum. You're defending Santorum??? Now that's funny! I am just pointing out a fact. I have no opinion either way What fact? You're afraid of something called the gay mafia? Talk about delusional... |
2nd Kook Seeks GOP Nomination
On May 16, 1:33*pm, wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 12:25:08 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:06:58 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2011 00:25:41 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2011 21:18:29 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: The fact is there are more Taliban now than there were in 2002 but the vast majority of them have no interest in attacking the US, they just want us out of their country, just like they wanted the Soviets out.. We somehow feel the need and the right to impose our culture on them and they don't like it. Well, in order to have less Taliban, you have to be prepared to kill them. Or like cockroaches they can become a bigger problem. I do think it best to leave, but after building a monument our of concrete. *It will read. "Live in peace, do what you want inside your borders and we will ignore your barbarism. *But take your problems to us again, this will be ground zero." Put it right in-front *of their capital buildings. *And if they ause trouble in the future, including frug trade, nuke'em. *No need to spread American and Canadian blood for a barbaric culture. The point is the Taliban don't really care about us one way or the other., If we get out they will chug along in their 10th century world without giving us a second thought. We are fighting their birth rate and we will never kill them all. The taliban are against the drug trade, if that is your issue. The drugs come from the people we support. You're wrong. They will harbor terrorists, such as bin laden if we don't make that unsustainable for them. We're in the process of doing that in Afg. We don't need to "kill them all." More nonsense. We have no real evidence that 150,000 troops on the ground is doing much to change anything. All we have proved is if you have enough people there we can drive the support underground. This is another unsustainable program that we will eventually stop. The only question is when. A month after we leave the Taliban will be back with the propaganda advantage of being able to point out how many friends and neighbors the evil Americans killed. We are making them stronger, not weaker. Hmm... well, we have Bob Gates saying it on 60 minutes, but I guess you know more than he does.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, but I am sure Greg is a lot more honest...snerk |
2nd Kook Seeks GOP Nomination
On Mon, 16 May 2011 13:12:09 -0400, Harryk
wrote: wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:09:40 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:56:48 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2011 13:09:46 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In , says... Have you ever googled Santorum? ;-) Yes. And that's as sick as Santorum. Just shows how low we are. All poison, little common sense. That was actually Savage and his gay mafia that google bombed Santorum. You're defending Santorum??? Now that's funny! I am just pointing out a fact. I have no opinion either way You have no opinion on Nutcase Rick? :) Santorum is a right wing Republican... by default he's a great person. |
2nd Kook Seeks GOP Nomination
wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 13:12:09 -0400, wrote: wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:09:40 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:56:48 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2011 13:09:46 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In , says... Have you ever googled Santorum? ;-) Yes. And that's as sick as Santorum. Just shows how low we are. All poison, little common sense. That was actually Savage and his gay mafia that google bombed Santorum. You're defending Santorum??? Now that's funny! I am just pointing out a fact. I have no opinion either way You have no opinion on Nutcase Rick? :) Santorum is a right wing Republican... by default he's a great person. That explains why he is an asshole of the first order. I'm surprised a gang of women haven't captured him and flayed the skin off his stinking carcass. |
2nd Kook Seeks GOP Nomination
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com