Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/04/2011 6:25 AM, Harryk wrote:

A very nice apologetica that conveniently makes no mention of the greed
factors.

I love this line: "In other words, it's not profitable to build new
refineries and refine more oil because the lower price of gas won't
provide sufficient return on investment."

Right, I believe that b.s., just as I believe all the other oil company
lies.

Funny, they start your own oil company and prove them wrong....

oh wait, Harry is broke.

Uh, only in your dreams, po' boy.

On 23/04/2011 1:27 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/04/2011 6:25 AM, Harryk wrote:

A very nice apologetica that conveniently makes no mention of the greed
factors.

I love this line: "In other words, it's not profitable to build new
refineries and refine more oil because the lower price of gas won't
provide sufficient return on investment."

Right, I believe that b.s., just as I believe all the other oil company
lies.

Funny, they start your own oil company and prove them wrong....

oh wait, Harry is broke.

Uh, only in your dreams, po' boy.

Well, if you had some money to invest you wouldn't be gripping so much.

I rest my case fleabagger.
--
I can assure you that the road to prosperity is not paved with
fleabagger debt.

Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/04/2011 1:27 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/04/2011 6:25 AM, Harryk wrote:

A very nice apologetica that conveniently makes no mention of the greed
factors.

I love this line: "In other words, it's not profitable to build new
refineries and refine more oil because the lower price of gas won't
provide sufficient return on investment."

Right, I believe that b.s., just as I believe all the other oil company
lies.

Funny, they start your own oil company and prove them wrong....

oh wait, Harry is broke.

Uh, only in your dreams, po' boy.

Well, if you had some money to invest you wouldn't be gripping so much.

I rest my case fleabagger.

You misunderstand, my dumb correspondent. I'm griping about the oil
companies as examples of corporations that need to be controlled. The
increased petrol prices aren't causing me any pain. I do, however, shop
for bargain prices, which is why I shop at our local market, which earns
me ten cents off a gallon for every hundred dollars I spend.

On 23/04/2011 3:31 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/04/2011 1:27 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/04/2011 6:25 AM, Harryk wrote:

A very nice apologetica that conveniently makes no mention of the
greed
factors.

I love this line: "In other words, it's not profitable to build new
refineries and refine more oil because the lower price of gas won't
provide sufficient return on investment."

Right, I believe that b.s., just as I believe all the other oil
company
lies.

Funny, they start your own oil company and prove them wrong....

oh wait, Harry is broke.

Uh, only in your dreams, po' boy.

Well, if you had some money to invest you wouldn't be gripping so much.

I rest my case fleabagger.

You misunderstand, my dumb correspondent. I'm griping about the oil
companies as examples of corporations that need to be controlled. The
increased petrol prices aren't causing me any pain. I do, however, shop
for bargain prices, which is why I shop at our local market, which earns
me ten cents off a gallon for every hundred dollars I spend.

So why would you control private business? So it can be as efficient at
disposing of money as Government Motors?

Please, I could use a good laugh. Specifically in detail how government
sticking its nose in supply and demand is going to work -- without
massive debt and taxation of course...

If I were Canada, Venezuela, Brazil, Saudi, or whomever, why would I
sell it to you below cost?
--
I can assure you that the road to prosperity is not paved with
fleabagger debt.

On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:53:45 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


So why would you control private business? So it can be as efficient at
disposing of money as Government Motors?

let's see...in the last 3 years, efficient private business cost the
US TEN TRILLION in national wealth.

so much for THAT little piece of right wing bull****

On 23/04/2011 5:42 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:53:45 -0600,
wrote:


So why would you control private business? So it can be as efficient at
disposing of money as Government Motors?

let's see...in the last 3 years, efficient private business cost the
US TEN TRILLION in national wealth.

so much for THAT little piece of right wing bull****

Market was overdosed on DEBT bubble, and it burst. Market just reacted.

But I will thank our liberal leftie money for nothing debtors...it
presented a once in a lifetime buying opportunity. But then, that is
the difference between the seasoned investor and a knee jerk.

The fact that so many were blinded by liberalism debt greed, well, isn't
a righties fault. Just envy on the left as many sold at the bottom when
they should have been buying....but then again they had too much DEBT.

Maybe someday the fleabaggers will understand the who depression circles
around mismanaged debt by the left and by the corrupt.
--
I can assure you that the road to prosperity is not paved with
fleabagger debt.

On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:19:24 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 23/04/2011 5:42 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:53:45 -0600,
wrote:


So why would you control private business? So it can be as efficient at
disposing of money as Government Motors?

let's see...in the last 3 years, efficient private business cost the
US TEN TRILLION in national wealth.

so much for THAT little piece of right wing bull****

Market was overdosed on DEBT bubble, and it burst. Market just reacted.

yep.the right wing deregulated the financial markets and ran the debt
market up to stratospheric levels

more reason we need to regulate wall street


But I will thank our liberal leftie money for nothing debtors...it
presented a once in a lifetime buying opportunity. But then, that is
the difference between the seasoned investor and a knee jerk.

gee. what did the liberal left do?

you keep bleating this. but never get into specifics.

is that because you're a racist who hates obama or because you're too
stupid to know it was CONSERVATIVES who engineered the destruction of
the US?



The fact that so many were blinded by liberalism debt greed, well, isn't
a righties fault. Just envy on the left as many sold at the bottom when
they should have been buying....but then again they had too much DEBT.

more cliches

any specifics?

no. i thought not. you ahve glen beck and rush and all the right wing
blather

and NO specifics at all. none

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/04/2011 1:27 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/04/2011 6:25 AM, Harryk wrote:

A very nice apologetica that conveniently makes no mention of the greed
factors.

I love this line: "In other words, it's not profitable to build new
refineries and refine more oil because the lower price of gas won't
provide sufficient return on investment."

Right, I believe that b.s., just as I believe all the other oil company
lies.

Funny, they start your own oil company and prove them wrong....

oh wait, Harry is broke.

Uh, only in your dreams, po' boy.

Well, if you had some money to invest you wouldn't be gripping so much.

I rest my case fleabagger.

You misunderstand, my dumb correspondent. I'm griping about the oil
companies as examples of corporations that need to be controlled. The
increased petrol prices aren't causing me any pain. I do, however, shop
for bargain prices, which is why I shop at our local market, which earns
me ten cents off a gallon for every hundred dollars I spend.

You should frequent mom and pop places instead of corporate Kroger.