On 08/04/2011 5:48 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:27:23 -0600,
wrote:

On 08/04/2011 4:21 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:50:44 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Dems failed to do their jobs by not producing a 2011 budget because
they were afraid of the election in 2010. Now, they are trying to be
"brave" when they face no risk. They had their chance and failed out
of cowardice, let the grownups produce the budget the dems were afraid
of.

gee. the GOP controls the house

where's their budget?

They want spending cuts. Democritiers want more debt. Got the picture?

they have control of congress

they dont need the dems

get the picture?


My fear is GOP isn't going to cut deep enough, maybe a 70B feel good.
They need at least a trillion. But a good move would be just to say do
what the hell you want, but no more debt and no more central bank ponzi
fraud money creation. Balanced budget or you are shut down.

htey need at least a trillion

'other than that, mrs lincoln, how did you like the play?'

uh huh

Well they still have to hear them out, wait for them to scratch their
ass and snort. In time it will pass...

But that is congress. It also has to do democriter senate. Which is
where the problem is.

I say just shut them down and wait until the senate wants to wake the
freak up.

On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:30:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 08/04/2011 5:48 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:27:23 -0600,
wrote:


My fear is GOP isn't going to cut deep enough, maybe a 70B feel good.
They need at least a trillion. But a good move would be just to say do
what the hell you want, but no more debt and no more central bank ponzi
fraud money creation. Balanced budget or you are shut down.

htey need at least a trillion

'other than that, mrs lincoln, how did you like the play?'

uh huh

Well they still have to hear them out, wait for them to scratch their
ass and snort. In time it will pass...

well let's see. he SHRIEKS that a TRILLION has to be cut

when asked for SPECIFICS he shucks and jives

typical right winger

On 08/04/2011 7:35 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:30:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 08/04/2011 5:48 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:27:23 -0600,
wrote:


My fear is GOP isn't going to cut deep enough, maybe a 70B feel good.
They need at least a trillion. But a good move would be just to say do
what the hell you want, but no more debt and no more central bank ponzi
fraud money creation. Balanced budget or you are shut down.

htey need at least a trillion

'other than that, mrs lincoln, how did you like the play?'

uh huh

Well they still have to hear them out, wait for them to scratch their
ass and snort. In time it will pass...

well let's see. he SHRIEKS that a TRILLION has to be cut

when asked for SPECIFICS he shucks and jives

typical right winger


Actually, at least $1.6 trillion needs to be cut. Less than a trillion
is a joke. Means he idiots are not serious. If the result of this is a
stupid $70B savings, USA is a write off as that is chicken sh!t for what
cuts they need to do.

On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:51:11 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 08/04/2011 7:35 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:30:31 -0600,
wrote:
Well they still have to hear them out, wait for them to scratch their
ass and snort. In time it will pass...

well let's see. he SHRIEKS that a TRILLION has to be cut

when asked for SPECIFICS he shucks and jives

typical right winger


Actually, at least $1.6 trillion needs to be cut. Less than a trillion
is a joke. Means he idiots are not serious. If the result of this is a
stupid $70B savings, USA is a write off as that is chicken sh!t for what
cuts they need to do.

like i said he SHRIEKS that obama's a socialist because he doesnt cut
the budget

but even HE cant tell us where he'd cut

maybe canuck is a socialist

On 09/04/2011 4:38 AM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:51:11 -0600,
wrote:

On 08/04/2011 7:35 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:30:31 -0600,
wrote:
Well they still have to hear them out, wait for them to scratch their
ass and snort. In time it will pass...

well let's see. he SHRIEKS that a TRILLION has to be cut

when asked for SPECIFICS he shucks and jives

typical right winger


Actually, at least $1.6 trillion needs to be cut. Less than a trillion
is a joke. Means he idiots are not serious. If the result of this is a
stupid $70B savings, USA is a write off as that is chicken sh!t for what
cuts they need to do.

like i said he SHRIEKS that obama's a socialist because he doesnt cut
the budget

but even HE cant tell us where he'd cut

maybe canuck is a socialist

Actually, 8 years ago I was asked if GM was too big to fail. I said no
that they could fail. And peers told me they were to big to fail and
kept their bonds. Well, GM went bankrupt. I have been asked is USA too
big to fail and I said no, they are failing, just a bit at a time.

In a nutshell, USA is now in my books an officially bankrupt country.
It can no longer service its debts with real money, it must like
Monopoly print 1/2 of its entire spending as it is insolvent. No one,
not even its own people will now lend new money to government as it is
insane to do so. USA is running on bu!!sh!t.

When the market figures this out, the US dollar will devalue at a rapid
rate. Just like it has with any other country that has tried the
print-tax-debt-spend. Oil isn't going up, the value of your fraud money
is going down.

Not a thing boobs like you can do to change it either. Looks like the
Tea Party caved into DC bribery and corruption. DC is a debt welsher.
Just means I will buy more gold and oil and less business/jobs.

On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 09:56:27 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/04/2011 4:38 AM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:51:11 -0600,
wrote:

On 08/04/2011 7:35 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:30:31 -0600,
wrote:
Well they still have to hear them out, wait for them to scratch their
ass and snort. In time it will pass...

well let's see. he SHRIEKS that a TRILLION has to be cut

when asked for SPECIFICS he shucks and jives

typical right winger


Actually, at least $1.6 trillion needs to be cut. Less than a trillion
is a joke. Means he idiots are not serious. If the result of this is a
stupid $70B savings, USA is a write off as that is chicken sh!t for what
cuts they need to do.

like i said he SHRIEKS that obama's a socialist because he doesnt cut
the budget

but even HE cant tell us where he'd cut

maybe canuck is a socialist

Actually, 8 years ago I was asked if GM was too big to fail. I said no
that they could fail. And peers told me they were to big to fail and
kept their bonds. Well, GM went bankrupt. I have been asked is USA too
big to fail and I said no, they are failing, just a bit at a time.

In a nutshell, USA is now in my books an officially bankrupt country.

yep. free market fundamentalism has bankrupted the US. the weathly
engineered one of the greatest transfers of wealth from the middle
class to the wealthy. and now we're bankrupt

courtesy of america's right wing.


When the market figures this out, the US dollar will devalue at a rapid
rate. Just like it has with any other country that has tried the
print-tax-debt-spend. Oil isn't going up, the value of your fraud money
is going down.

the market?? HAHAHAHA the market is the problem! it's an out of
control freight train that has only the goal of enriching itself
rather than growing the economy