On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:50:44 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Dems failed to do their jobs by not producing a 2011 budget because
they were afraid of the election in 2010. Now, they are trying to be
"brave" when they face no risk. They had their chance and failed out
of cowardice, let the grownups produce the budget the dems were afraid
of.

gee. the GOP controls the house

where's their budget?

On 08/04/2011 4:21 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:50:44 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Dems failed to do their jobs by not producing a 2011 budget because
they were afraid of the election in 2010. Now, they are trying to be
"brave" when they face no risk. They had their chance and failed out
of cowardice, let the grownups produce the budget the dems were afraid
of.

gee. the GOP controls the house

where's their budget?

They want spending cuts. Democritiers want more debt. Got the picture?

My fear is GOP isn't going to cut deep enough, maybe a 70B feel good.
They need at least a trillion. But a good move would be just to say do
what the hell you want, but no more debt and no more central bank ponzi
fraud money creation. Balanced budget or you are shut down.

On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:27:23 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 08/04/2011 4:21 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:50:44 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Dems failed to do their jobs by not producing a 2011 budget because
they were afraid of the election in 2010. Now, they are trying to be
"brave" when they face no risk. They had their chance and failed out
of cowardice, let the grownups produce the budget the dems were afraid
of.

gee. the GOP controls the house

where's their budget?

They want spending cuts. Democritiers want more debt. Got the picture?

they have control of congress

they dont need the dems

get the picture?


My fear is GOP isn't going to cut deep enough, maybe a 70B feel good.
They need at least a trillion. But a good move would be just to say do
what the hell you want, but no more debt and no more central bank ponzi
fraud money creation. Balanced budget or you are shut down.

htey need at least a trillion

'other than that, mrs lincoln, how did you like the play?'

uh huh

On 08/04/2011 5:48 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:27:23 -0600,
wrote:

On 08/04/2011 4:21 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:50:44 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Dems failed to do their jobs by not producing a 2011 budget because
they were afraid of the election in 2010. Now, they are trying to be
"brave" when they face no risk. They had their chance and failed out
of cowardice, let the grownups produce the budget the dems were afraid
of.

gee. the GOP controls the house

where's their budget?

They want spending cuts. Democritiers want more debt. Got the picture?

they have control of congress

they dont need the dems

get the picture?


My fear is GOP isn't going to cut deep enough, maybe a 70B feel good.
They need at least a trillion. But a good move would be just to say do
what the hell you want, but no more debt and no more central bank ponzi
fraud money creation. Balanced budget or you are shut down.

htey need at least a trillion

'other than that, mrs lincoln, how did you like the play?'

uh huh

Well they still have to hear them out, wait for them to scratch their
ass and snort. In time it will pass...

But that is congress. It also has to do democriter senate. Which is
where the problem is.

I say just shut them down and wait until the senate wants to wake the
freak up.

On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:30:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 08/04/2011 5:48 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:27:23 -0600,
wrote:


My fear is GOP isn't going to cut deep enough, maybe a 70B feel good.
They need at least a trillion. But a good move would be just to say do
what the hell you want, but no more debt and no more central bank ponzi
fraud money creation. Balanced budget or you are shut down.

htey need at least a trillion

'other than that, mrs lincoln, how did you like the play?'

uh huh

Well they still have to hear them out, wait for them to scratch their
ass and snort. In time it will pass...

well let's see. he SHRIEKS that a TRILLION has to be cut

when asked for SPECIFICS he shucks and jives

typical right winger

On 08/04/2011 7:35 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:30:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 08/04/2011 5:48 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:27:23 -0600,
wrote:


My fear is GOP isn't going to cut deep enough, maybe a 70B feel good.
They need at least a trillion. But a good move would be just to say do
what the hell you want, but no more debt and no more central bank ponzi
fraud money creation. Balanced budget or you are shut down.

htey need at least a trillion

'other than that, mrs lincoln, how did you like the play?'

uh huh

Well they still have to hear them out, wait for them to scratch their
ass and snort. In time it will pass...

well let's see. he SHRIEKS that a TRILLION has to be cut

when asked for SPECIFICS he shucks and jives

typical right winger


Actually, at least $1.6 trillion needs to be cut. Less than a trillion
is a joke. Means he idiots are not serious. If the result of this is a
stupid $70B savings, USA is a write off as that is chicken sh!t for what
cuts they need to do.

On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:51:11 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 08/04/2011 7:35 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:30:31 -0600,
wrote:
Well they still have to hear them out, wait for them to scratch their
ass and snort. In time it will pass...

well let's see. he SHRIEKS that a TRILLION has to be cut

when asked for SPECIFICS he shucks and jives

typical right winger


Actually, at least $1.6 trillion needs to be cut. Less than a trillion
is a joke. Means he idiots are not serious. If the result of this is a
stupid $70B savings, USA is a write off as that is chicken sh!t for what
cuts they need to do.

like i said he SHRIEKS that obama's a socialist because he doesnt cut
the budget

but even HE cant tell us where he'd cut

maybe canuck is a socialist