|
Biden to impeach Obama
Joe Biden was quoted as saying:
"Ladies and gentlemen, I drafted an outline of what I think the Constitutional limits [garbled] have on the President with the War Clause. I went to five leading scholars, Constitutional scholars, and they drafted a treatise for me that is being distributed to every Senator. And I want to make it clear, and I値l make it clear to the President: that if he takes this nation to war , without Congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him." Uh, wait a minute, that was 2007. |
Biden to impeach Obama
I_am_Tosk wrote:
In article41220ba6-6602-41ad-8843-a79b6ae47cef@ 34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says... Joe Biden was quoted as saying: "Ladies and gentlemen, I drafted an outline of what I think the Constitutional limits [garbled] have on the President with the War Clause. I went to five leading scholars, Constitutional scholars, and they drafted a treatise for me that is being distributed to every Senator. And I want to make it clear, and I?ll make it clear to the President: that if he takes this nation to war , without Congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him." Uh, wait a minute, that was 2007. I really think Obama is finished in 2012. The absolute lack of any leadership along with the blatant corruption is not going to get by the moderates this time around. Heheh. The idiot Ingersoll thinks the RepubliThugs have "attractive" presidential candidates in the wings. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On 23/03/2011 8:27 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
Joe Biden was quoted as saying: "Ladies and gentlemen, I drafted an outline of what I think the Constitutional limits [garbled] have on the President with the War Clause. I went to five leading scholars, Constitutional scholars, and they drafted a treatise for me that is being distributed to every Senator. And I want to make it clear, and I値l make it clear to the President: that if he takes this nation to war , without Congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him." Uh, wait a minute, that was 2007. Nobody has the guts to impeach THE Obama. No one wants their name associated with the fall of the American DC Corrpution empire. All Obama wans is for the debt to be Obamacised. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On 23/03/2011 8:47 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In article41220ba6-6602-41ad-8843-a79b6ae47cef@ 34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says... Joe Biden was quoted as saying: "Ladies and gentlemen, I drafted an outline of what I think the Constitutional limits [garbled] have on the President with the War Clause. I went to five leading scholars, Constitutional scholars, and they drafted a treatise for me that is being distributed to every Senator. And I want to make it clear, and I?ll make it clear to the President: that if he takes this nation to war , without Congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him." Uh, wait a minute, that was 2007. I really think Obama is finished in 2012. The absolute lack of any leadership along with the blatant corruption is not going to get by the moderates this time around. Depends. Much of social-liberla corruption depends on managing the herd against themselves. Say government steels $10,000 in taxes, then gives them back $50 then they think he is god. That is how it works in Canada. Almost everyone can get a rebate check from the government, it sells big fat obease and corrupt government. What people fail to do is see he big picture and begin to see myopic like, and support the very corruption that enslaves them. Most people today lack the rationality skills, mentally lazy to see this. Thus freedoms dwindle. Economic freedom for many is now a thing of the past. Just good litle Omamanite sheeples. Promise the stupid what they want and get elected, the gullability is amazing. Sad, but how many today could pass this test? An 1895 8th grade test: 8th Grade Final Exam: Salina , Kansas - 1895 Grammar (Time, one hour) 1. Give nine rules for the use of capital letters 2. Name the parts of speech and define those that have no modifications. 3. Define verse, stanza and paragraph 4. What are the principal parts of a verb? Give principal parts of 'lie,''play,' and 'run' 5. Define case; illustrate each case. 6 What is punctuation? Give rules for principal marks of punctuation. 7 - 10. Write a composition of about 150 words and show therein that you understand the practical use of the rules of grammar. Arithmetic (Time,1 hour 15 minutes) 1. Name and define the Fundamental Rules of Arithmetic. 2. A wagon box is 2 ft. Deep, 10 feet long, and 3 ft. Wide. How many bushels of wheat will it hold? 3. If a load of wheat weighs 3,942 lbs., what is it worth at 50cts/bushel, deducting 1,050 lbs. For tare? 4. District No 33 has a valuation of $35,000. What is the necessary levy to carry on a school seven months at $50 per month, and have $104 for incidentals? 5. Find the cost of 6,720 lbs. Coal at $6.00 per ton. 6. Find the interest of $512.60 for 8 months and 18 days at 7 percent. 7. What is the cost of 40 boards 12 inches wide and 16 ft.. Long at $20 per metre? 8. Find bank discount on $300 for 90 days (no grace) at 10 percent. 9. What is the cost of a square farm at $15 per acre, the distance of which is 640 rods? 10. Write a Bank Check, a Promissory Note, and a Receipt U.S. History (Time, 45 minutes) 1 Give the epochs into which U.S. History is divided 2. Give an account of the discovery of America by Columbus 3. Relate the causes and results of the Revolutionary War. 4. Show the territorial growth of the United States 5. Tell what you can of the history of Kansas 6. Describe three of the most prominent battles of the Rebellion. 7. Who were the following: Morse, Whitney, Fulton , Bell , Lincoln , Penn, and Howe? 8. Name events connected with the following dates: 1607, 1620, 1800, 1849, 1865. Orthography (Time, one hour) Do we even know Orthography is ?? 1. What is meant by the following: alphabet, phonetic, orthography, etymology, syllabication 2.. What are elementary sounds? How classified? 3. What are the following, and give examples of each: trigraph, subvocals, diphthong, cognate letters, linguals 4. Give four substitutes for caret 'u.' 5. Give two rules for spelling words with final 'e.' Name two exceptions under each rule. 6. Give two uses of silent letters in spelling. Illustrate each. 7. Define the following prefixes and use in connection with a word: bi, dis, mis, pre, semi, post, non, inter, mono, sup. 8. Mark diacritically and divide into syllables the following, and name the sign that indicates the sound: card, ball, mercy, sir, odd, cell, rise, blood, fare, last. 9. Use the following correctly in sentences: cite, site, sight, fane, fain, feign, vane , vain, vein, raze, raise, rays. 10. Write 10 words frequently mispronounced and indicate pronunciation by use of diacritical marks And by syllabication. Geography (Time, one hour) 1 What is climate? Upon what does climate depend? 2. How do you account for the extremes of climate in Kansas ? 3. Of what use are rivers? Of what use is the ocean? 4. Describe the mountains of North America 5. Name and describe the following: Monrovia , Odessa , Denver , Manitoba , Hecla , Yukon , St. Helena, Juan Fernandez, Aspinwall and Orinoco 6. Name and locate the principal trade centers of the U.S. Name all the republics of Europe and give the capital of each. 8. Why is the Atlantic Coast colder than the Pacific in the same latitude? 9. Describe the process by which the water of the ocean returns to the sources of rivers. 10. Describe the movements of the earth. Give the inclination of the earth. It is close booked, and no interent. You have 5 hours. 20 page results typical. 40 pages of output as you would use the back for economy. |
Biden to impeach Obama
|
Biden to impeach Obama
|
Biden to impeach Obama
|
Biden to impeach Obama
On 23/03/2011 3:38 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:02:11 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:27:40 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Joe Biden was quoted as saying: "Ladies and gentlemen, I drafted an outline of what I think the Constitutional limits [garbled] have on the President with the War Clause. I went to five leading scholars, Constitutional scholars, and they drafted a treatise for me that is being distributed to every Senator. And I want to make it clear, and I値l make it clear to the President: that if he takes this nation to war , without Congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him." Uh, wait a minute, that was 2007. Biden can't impeach Obama. That has to come out of the house. There was another constitutional scolar who did make this statement in 2007 "The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation," It was Barack Obama. Feel free to write your Congressman. May not be a big need to. Impeachment is being discussed by some. And your buddy Obama supports the same people Al-Qaeda does, your thoughts on this? You a 9/11 supporter because that is who al_Qaeda is. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:17:39 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 23/03/2011 3:38 PM, wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:02:11 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:27:40 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Joe Biden was quoted as saying: "Ladies and gentlemen, I drafted an outline of what I think the Constitutional limits [garbled] have on the President with the War Clause. I went to five leading scholars, Constitutional scholars, and they drafted a treatise for me that is being distributed to every Senator. And I want to make it clear, and I値l make it clear to the President: that if he takes this nation to war , without Congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him." Uh, wait a minute, that was 2007. Biden can't impeach Obama. That has to come out of the house. There was another constitutional scolar who did make this statement in 2007 "The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation," It was Barack Obama. Feel free to write your Congressman. May not be a big need to. Impeachment is being discussed by some. And your buddy Obama supports the same people Al-Qaeda does, your thoughts on this? You a 9/11 supporter because that is who al_Qaeda is. You're an idiot. That's my thought. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On 23/03/2011 10:19 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:17:39 -0600, wrote: On 23/03/2011 3:38 PM, wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:02:11 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:27:40 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Joe Biden was quoted as saying: "Ladies and gentlemen, I drafted an outline of what I think the Constitutional limits [garbled] have on the President with the War Clause. I went to five leading scholars, Constitutional scholars, and they drafted a treatise for me that is being distributed to every Senator. And I want to make it clear, and I値l make it clear to the President: that if he takes this nation to war , without Congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him." Uh, wait a minute, that was 2007. Biden can't impeach Obama. That has to come out of the house. There was another constitutional scolar who did make this statement in 2007 "The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation," It was Barack Obama. Feel free to write your Congressman. May not be a big need to. Impeachment is being discussed by some. And your buddy Obama supports the same people Al-Qaeda does, your thoughts on this? You a 9/11 supporter because that is who al_Qaeda is. You're an idiot. That's my thought. Good think about you being in a back water hole in the US is that your DNA does not make it up here. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:09:35 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 23/03/2011 10:19 PM, wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:17:39 -0600, wrote: On 23/03/2011 3:38 PM, wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:02:11 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:27:40 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Joe Biden was quoted as saying: "Ladies and gentlemen, I drafted an outline of what I think the Constitutional limits [garbled] have on the President with the War Clause. I went to five leading scholars, Constitutional scholars, and they drafted a treatise for me that is being distributed to every Senator. And I want to make it clear, and I値l make it clear to the President: that if he takes this nation to war , without Congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him." Uh, wait a minute, that was 2007. Biden can't impeach Obama. That has to come out of the house. There was another constitutional scolar who did make this statement in 2007 "The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation," It was Barack Obama. Feel free to write your Congressman. May not be a big need to. Impeachment is being discussed by some. And your buddy Obama supports the same people Al-Qaeda does, your thoughts on this? You a 9/11 supporter because that is who al_Qaeda is. You're an idiot. That's my thought. Good think about you being in a back water hole in the US is that your DNA does not make it up here. Good grief you're stupid and illiterate! |
Biden to impeach Obama
On 24/03/2011 11:41 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:09:35 -0600, wrote: On 23/03/2011 10:19 PM, wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:17:39 -0600, wrote: On 23/03/2011 3:38 PM, wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:02:11 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:27:40 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Joe Biden was quoted as saying: "Ladies and gentlemen, I drafted an outline of what I think the Constitutional limits [garbled] have on the President with the War Clause. I went to five leading scholars, Constitutional scholars, and they drafted a treatise for me that is being distributed to every Senator. And I want to make it clear, and I値l make it clear to the President: that if he takes this nation to war , without Congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him." Uh, wait a minute, that was 2007. Biden can't impeach Obama. That has to come out of the house. There was another constitutional scolar who did make this statement in 2007 "The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation," It was Barack Obama. Feel free to write your Congressman. May not be a big need to. Impeachment is being discussed by some. And your buddy Obama supports the same people Al-Qaeda does, your thoughts on this? You a 9/11 supporter because that is who al_Qaeda is. You're an idiot. That's my thought. Good think about you being in a back water hole in the US is that your DNA does not make it up here. Good grief you're stupid and illiterate! Good part is a Democrat is going to lead the way to Obama's impeachment. That is if congres doesn't shut off Obama's money first. Obama is a one term wonder, I smell total wipeout in 2012. In fact, maybe Obama will even step down by then? Eitehr case, Obama now has his clock set. Worst freaking president the US has ever had. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:44:52 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 24/03/2011 11:41 AM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:09:35 -0600, wrote: On 23/03/2011 10:19 PM, wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:17:39 -0600, wrote: On 23/03/2011 3:38 PM, wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:02:11 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:27:40 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Joe Biden was quoted as saying: "Ladies and gentlemen, I drafted an outline of what I think the Constitutional limits [garbled] have on the President with the War Clause. I went to five leading scholars, Constitutional scholars, and they drafted a treatise for me that is being distributed to every Senator. And I want to make it clear, and I値l make it clear to the President: that if he takes this nation to war , without Congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him." Uh, wait a minute, that was 2007. Biden can't impeach Obama. That has to come out of the house. There was another constitutional scolar who did make this statement in 2007 "The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation," It was Barack Obama. Feel free to write your Congressman. May not be a big need to. Impeachment is being discussed by some. And your buddy Obama supports the same people Al-Qaeda does, your thoughts on this? You a 9/11 supporter because that is who al_Qaeda is. You're an idiot. That's my thought. Good think about you being in a back water hole in the US is that your DNA does not make it up here. Good grief you're stupid and illiterate! Good part is a Democrat is going to lead the way to Obama's impeachment. That is if congres doesn't shut off Obama's money first. Obama is a one term wonder, I smell total wipeout in 2012. In fact, maybe Obama will even step down by then? Eitehr case, Obama now has his clock set. Worst freaking president the US has ever had. You are incredibly stupid. It's got to be an act. Nobody could be this moronic and breathe on their own. |
Biden to impeach Obama
|
Biden to impeach Obama
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 2:52 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:44:52 -0600, wrote: Good part is a Democrat is going to lead the way to Obama's impeachment. That is if congres doesn't shut off Obama's money first. Obama is a one term wonder, I smell total wipeout in 2012. In fact, maybe Obama will even step down by then? Eitehr case, Obama now has his clock set. Worst freaking president the US has ever had. Kucinich? I doubt the democrats claim him either. The only reason Obama will survive, would be because the GOP doesn't have a decent candidate who is willing to run. Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Go for Rand Paul? It figures a loon like you would go for another loon. |
Biden to impeach Obama
|
Biden to impeach Obama
On 24/03/2011 3:35 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote: On 24/03/2011 2:52 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:44:52 -0600, wrote: Good part is a Democrat is going to lead the way to Obama's impeachment. That is if congres doesn't shut off Obama's money first. Obama is a one term wonder, I smell total wipeout in 2012. In fact, maybe Obama will even step down by then? Eitehr case, Obama now has his clock set. Worst freaking president the US has ever had. Kucinich? I doubt the democrats claim him either. The only reason Obama will survive, would be because the GOP doesn't have a decent candidate who is willing to run. Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Go for Rand Paul? It figures a loon like you would go for another loon. Hey, if the name get a fleabagger in a snarl, must be a good choice. Rand Paul for president. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On 24/03/2011 3:51 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:52:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:44:52 -0600, wrote: Good part is a Democrat is going to lead the way to Obama's impeachment. That is if congres doesn't shut off Obama's money first. Obama is a one term wonder, I smell total wipeout in 2012. In fact, maybe Obama will even step down by then? Eitehr case, Obama now has his clock set. Worst freaking president the US has ever had. Kucinich? I doubt the democrats claim him either. The only reason Obama will survive, would be because the GOP doesn't have a decent candidate who is willing to run. Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. |
Biden to impeach Obama
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 3:35 PM, Harryk wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 24/03/2011 2:52 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:44:52 -0600, wrote: Good part is a Democrat is going to lead the way to Obama's impeachment. That is if congres doesn't shut off Obama's money first. Obama is a one term wonder, I smell total wipeout in 2012. In fact, maybe Obama will even step down by then? Eitehr case, Obama now has his clock set. Worst freaking president the US has ever had. Kucinich? I doubt the democrats claim him either. The only reason Obama will survive, would be because the GOP doesn't have a decent candidate who is willing to run. Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Go for Rand Paul? It figures a loon like you would go for another loon. Hey, if the name get a fleabagger in a snarl, must be a good choice. Rand Paul for president. What you do here is give reasonable thinking people reasons to dismiss your every political post. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:35:07 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 24/03/2011 3:51 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:52:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:44:52 -0600, wrote: Good part is a Democrat is going to lead the way to Obama's impeachment. That is if congres doesn't shut off Obama's money first. Obama is a one term wonder, I smell total wipeout in 2012. In fact, maybe Obama will even step down by then? Eitehr case, Obama now has his clock set. Worst freaking president the US has ever had. Kucinich? I doubt the democrats claim him either. The only reason Obama will survive, would be because the GOP doesn't have a decent candidate who is willing to run. Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On 24/03/2011 5:36 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:35:07 -0600, wrote: On 24/03/2011 3:51 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:52:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:44:52 -0600, wrote: Good part is a Democrat is going to lead the way to Obama's impeachment. That is if congres doesn't shut off Obama's money first. Obama is a one term wonder, I smell total wipeout in 2012. In fact, maybe Obama will even step down by then? Eitehr case, Obama now has his clock set. Worst freaking president the US has ever had. Kucinich? I doubt the democrats claim him either. The only reason Obama will survive, would be because the GOP doesn't have a decent candidate who is willing to run. Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:20:13 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 24/03/2011 5:36 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:35:07 -0600, wrote: On 24/03/2011 3:51 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:52:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:44:52 -0600, wrote: Good part is a Democrat is going to lead the way to Obama's impeachment. That is if congres doesn't shut off Obama's money first. Obama is a one term wonder, I smell total wipeout in 2012. In fact, maybe Obama will even step down by then? Eitehr case, Obama now has his clock set. Worst freaking president the US has ever had. Kucinich? I doubt the democrats claim him either. The only reason Obama will survive, would be because the GOP doesn't have a decent candidate who is willing to run. Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On 24/03/2011 8:15 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:04:11 -0700, wrote: Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. As far as I am concerned "baggage" is really experience. That is particularly true in this case. I would really prefer someone who wasn't from the Bush/Clinton/Bush legacy. I am just not sure who it would be, I know I will be reminded I can't vote but here goes... ANYBODY but Obama. We got the bottom of the pond with that one. |
Biden to impeach Obama
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 8:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:04:11 -0700, wrote: Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. As far as I am concerned "baggage" is really experience. That is particularly true in this case. I would really prefer someone who wasn't from the Bush/Clinton/Bush legacy. I am just not sure who it would be, I know I will be reminded I can't vote but here goes... ANYBODY but Obama. We got the bottom of the pond with that one. If you seriously believe this country would be better off with Senile McCain and Brainless Palin at the helm, you are even dumber than I thought. The thought of having the imbecile Palin a heartbeat away from the presidency should have been enough for any responsible adult to vote for Obama and Biden. Michele Bachmann wants to be the GOP candidate in 2012. She has a reasonably good chance of winning the first Republican caucus, the one held in Iowa, where the Republican voters literally are dumber than a post. Bachmann, of course, panders to extremist christians and to the teabaggers, the mindless voters who control the hierarchy of the GOP these days. Nothing would please me more than to see that fruitcake succeed in the GOP. |
Biden to impeach Obama
"Harryk" wrote in message ... Canuck57 wrote: On 24/03/2011 8:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:04:11 -0700, wrote: Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. As far as I am concerned "baggage" is really experience. That is particularly true in this case. I would really prefer someone who wasn't from the Bush/Clinton/Bush legacy. I am just not sure who it would be, I know I will be reminded I can't vote but here goes... ANYBODY but Obama. We got the bottom of the pond with that one. If you seriously believe this country would be better off with Senile McCain and Brainless Palin at the helm, you are even dumber than I thought. The thought of having the imbecile Palin a heartbeat away from the presidency should have been enough for any responsible adult to vote for Obama and Biden. Michele Bachmann wants to be the GOP candidate in 2012. She has a reasonably good chance of winning the first Republican caucus, the one held in Iowa, where the Republican voters literally are dumber than a post. Bachmann, of course, panders to extremist christians and to the teabaggers, the mindless voters who control the hierarchy of the GOP these days. Nothing would please me more than to see that fruitcake succeed in the GOP. ************* It truly is sad and a bit frightening to see how the US has declined over the past dozen years or so. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On 3/25/2011 8:27 AM, True North wrote:
"Harryk" wrote in message ... Canuck57 wrote: On 24/03/2011 8:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:04:11 -0700, wrote: Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. As far as I am concerned "baggage" is really experience. That is particularly true in this case. I would really prefer someone who wasn't from the Bush/Clinton/Bush legacy. I am just not sure who it would be, I know I will be reminded I can't vote but here goes... ANYBODY but Obama. We got the bottom of the pond with that one. If you seriously believe this country would be better off with Senile McCain and Brainless Palin at the helm, you are even dumber than I thought. The thought of having the imbecile Palin a heartbeat away from the presidency should have been enough for any responsible adult to vote for Obama and Biden. Michele Bachmann wants to be the GOP candidate in 2012. She has a reasonably good chance of winning the first Republican caucus, the one held in Iowa, where the Republican voters literally are dumber than a post. Bachmann, of course, panders to extremist christians and to the teabaggers, the mindless voters who control the hierarchy of the GOP these days. Nothing would please me more than to see that fruitcake succeed in the GOP. ************* It truly is sad and a bit frightening to see how the US has declined over the past dozen years or so. The last two have been particularly frightening. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On 3/25/2011 12:06 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 8:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:04:11 -0700, wrote: Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. As far as I am concerned "baggage" is really experience. That is particularly true in this case. I would really prefer someone who wasn't from the Bush/Clinton/Bush legacy. I am just not sure who it would be, I know I will be reminded I can't vote but here goes... ANYBODY but Obama. We got the bottom of the pond with that one. But but, pondscum floats. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On 25/03/2011 5:31 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote: On 24/03/2011 8:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:04:11 -0700, wrote: Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. As far as I am concerned "baggage" is really experience. That is particularly true in this case. I would really prefer someone who wasn't from the Bush/Clinton/Bush legacy. I am just not sure who it would be, I know I will be reminded I can't vote but here goes... ANYBODY but Obama. We got the bottom of the pond with that one. If you seriously believe this country would be better off with Senile McCain and Brainless Palin at the helm, you are even dumber than I thought. The thought of having the imbecile Palin a heartbeat away from the presidency should have been enough for any responsible adult to vote for Obama and Biden. Michele Bachmann wants to be the GOP candidate in 2012. She has a reasonably good chance of winning the first Republican caucus, the one held in Iowa, where the Republican voters literally are dumber than a post. Bachmann, of course, panders to extremist christians and to the teabaggers, the mindless voters who control the hierarchy of the GOP these days. Nothing would please me more than to see that fruitcake succeed in the GOP. Observing politicians for some 30+ years, I would take an honest jackass over a brilliant deceptive criminal like personality any day. And this does not go to say McCain is a jackass. I like him, but think better choices exist. Rand Paul/Palin would be good. Problem is they are honest and big money will find a ways to prevent them from getting elected. Just find an honest one, I would even vote dmocrat if they were HONEST and in fleabagger infested. Because DC is loaded with corruption, and a house cleaning is long over due. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:15:07 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:04:11 -0700, wrote: Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. As far as I am concerned "baggage" is really experience. That is particularly true in this case. I would really prefer someone who wasn't from the Bush/Clinton/Bush legacy. I am just not sure who it would be, Really? Like Newt's experience dumping his wife while she was getting chemo? Was that his first wife or his third? Or, like all the experience pandering to the crazy bat**** people? Or, the stop funding the gov't crowd that has no governance experience? |
Biden to impeach Obama
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:06:11 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 24/03/2011 8:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:04:11 -0700, wrote: Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. As far as I am concerned "baggage" is really experience. That is particularly true in this case. I would really prefer someone who wasn't from the Bush/Clinton/Bush legacy. I am just not sure who it would be, I know I will be reminded I can't vote but here goes... ANYBODY but Obama. We got the bottom of the pond with that one. Except there is no "we" that includes you. You hate him because he's black, and he's better educated and more successful than you. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On 25/03/2011 6:27 AM, True North wrote:
"Harryk" wrote in message ... Canuck57 wrote: On 24/03/2011 8:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:04:11 -0700, wrote: Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. As far as I am concerned "baggage" is really experience. That is particularly true in this case. I would really prefer someone who wasn't from the Bush/Clinton/Bush legacy. I am just not sure who it would be, I know I will be reminded I can't vote but here goes... ANYBODY but Obama. We got the bottom of the pond with that one. If you seriously believe this country would be better off with Senile McCain and Brainless Palin at the helm, you are even dumber than I thought. The thought of having the imbecile Palin a heartbeat away from the presidency should have been enough for any responsible adult to vote for Obama and Biden. Michele Bachmann wants to be the GOP candidate in 2012. She has a reasonably good chance of winning the first Republican caucus, the one held in Iowa, where the Republican voters literally are dumber than a post. Bachmann, of course, panders to extremist christians and to the teabaggers, the mindless voters who control the hierarchy of the GOP these days. Nothing would please me more than to see that fruitcake succeed in the GOP. ************* It truly is sad and a bit frightening to see how the US has declined over the past dozen years or so. Yep, just when 2006 congress started messing with the money system in print/create of new mney. By 2007 government was having trouble borrowing and unemployment was on the rise. In 208 it came to a head. So what does congress do? More of the same as Obama big debt-spender can't control spending. Congress should just say today we balance the budget. No longer can government spend what it does not have in revenue. Civil service goes home on layoff if money runs out. Cut the waste fast. Cancel money for nothing, tell Freddie and Fannie they are bankrupt and people have to get and qualify for mortgages at real banks. But it will not happen. Debt is like a heroin addiction, it usually ends the same way too. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On 25/03/2011 6:51 AM, OmDeFlume wrote:
On 3/25/2011 12:06 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 24/03/2011 8:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:04:11 -0700, wrote: Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. As far as I am concerned "baggage" is really experience. That is particularly true in this case. I would really prefer someone who wasn't from the Bush/Clinton/Bush legacy. I am just not sure who it would be, I know I will be reminded I can't vote but here goes... ANYBODY but Obama. We got the bottom of the pond with that one. But but, pondscum floats. Sure was a dirty pond whee Obama came from. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On 25/03/2011 10:04 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:06:11 -0600, wrote: On 24/03/2011 8:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:04:11 -0700, wrote: Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. As far as I am concerned "baggage" is really experience. That is particularly true in this case. I would really prefer someone who wasn't from the Bush/Clinton/Bush legacy. I am just not sure who it would be, I know I will be reminded I can't vote but here goes... ANYBODY but Obama. We got the bottom of the pond with that one. Except there is no "we" that includes you. You hate him because he's black, and he's better educated and more successful than you. So is that an excuse or a reason? |
Biden to impeach Obama
Canuck57 wrote:
On 25/03/2011 6:51 AM, OmDeFlume wrote: On 3/25/2011 12:06 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 24/03/2011 8:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:04:11 -0700, wrote: Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. As far as I am concerned "baggage" is really experience. That is particularly true in this case. I would really prefer someone who wasn't from the Bush/Clinton/Bush legacy. I am just not sure who it would be, I know I will be reminded I can't vote but here goes... ANYBODY but Obama. We got the bottom of the pond with that one. But but, pondscum floats. Sure was a dirty pond whee Obama came from. Really? I've been to Hawaii twice, and I found it to be a remarkable place. How many times have you been there? |
Biden to impeach Obama
On 25/03/2011 10:03 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:15:07 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:04:11 -0700, wrote: Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. As far as I am concerned "baggage" is really experience. That is particularly true in this case. I would really prefer someone who wasn't from the Bush/Clinton/Bush legacy. I am just not sure who it would be, Really? Like Newt's experience dumping his wife while she was getting chemo? Was that his first wife or his third? Or, like all the experience pandering to the crazy bat**** people? Or, the stop funding the gov't crowd that has no governance experience? Actually, on of the few politicians I respected the most was NTO a lawyr, was NOT a professional politician, was NOT a civil servant and never worked in government before being elected. Worked for over 10 years as a commoner too. Honest. And he cleaned house. Walked out of some elections with 80% support too. Some of the best politicians are NOT professional politicians. Most who contributed to the constitution of the United States were not politicians by trade. And that "We the people..." document, it is a brilliant piece of work. No corrupt politician could ever write that. Yes, I have been to DC, including he Lincoln memorial. Lots of good reading on the walls in there. Trouble is DC is now loaded with corruption. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On 25/03/2011 10:21 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote: On 25/03/2011 6:51 AM, OmDeFlume wrote: On 3/25/2011 12:06 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 24/03/2011 8:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:04:11 -0700, wrote: Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. As far as I am concerned "baggage" is really experience. That is particularly true in this case. I would really prefer someone who wasn't from the Bush/Clinton/Bush legacy. I am just not sure who it would be, I know I will be reminded I can't vote but here goes... ANYBODY but Obama. We got the bottom of the pond with that one. But but, pondscum floats. Sure was a dirty pond whee Obama came from. Really? I've been to Hawaii twice, and I found it to be a remarkable place. How many times have you been there? Not once. I prefer Costa Rica, Panama, Mexico. Have lived in 4 other countries too. Been to Europe. Probably been to at least 40 states on a visit or pass through. And you? Whole life in backwater USA? |
Biden to impeach Obama
Canuck57 wrote:
On 25/03/2011 10:21 AM, Harryk wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 25/03/2011 6:51 AM, OmDeFlume wrote: On 3/25/2011 12:06 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 24/03/2011 8:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:04:11 -0700, wrote: Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. As far as I am concerned "baggage" is really experience. That is particularly true in this case. I would really prefer someone who wasn't from the Bush/Clinton/Bush legacy. I am just not sure who it would be, I know I will be reminded I can't vote but here goes... ANYBODY but Obama. We got the bottom of the pond with that one. But but, pondscum floats. Sure was a dirty pond whee Obama came from. Really? I've been to Hawaii twice, and I found it to be a remarkable place. How many times have you been there? Not once. I prefer Costa Rica, Panama, Mexico. Have lived in 4 other countries too. Been to Europe. Probably been to at least 40 states on a visit or pass through. And you? Whole life in backwater USA? No, I've been around and to more countries and continents than you've mentioned. I do like Hawaii a lot, though. Beautiful, multi-cultural, terrific beaches, pretty mountains, fabulous local restaurants, et cetera. |
Biden to impeach Obama
On 25/03/2011 11:04 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote: On 25/03/2011 10:21 AM, Harryk wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 25/03/2011 6:51 AM, OmDeFlume wrote: On 3/25/2011 12:06 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 24/03/2011 8:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:04:11 -0700, wrote: Colin Powell could beat him but he is not willing and the far right doesn't think he is right enough. Powell has too much baggage with the UN testimony. Too bad, since he's a decent, thoughtful guy who couldn't win against Cheney. You could use the same argument as fleabaggers used on McCain, Powell is too old. Powell is just one year younger, but he isn't senile and isn't an angry old man. Pretty sure Obama is going to be a one term dodo if they can come up with anything 1/2 baked. I would welcome a Republican presidential candidate who would be a rational, viable choice, which would be helpful for a healthy, honest, debate about the important issues facing us. I don't see one around that has any chance of getting the nomination. It think it's more likely that it'll be someone who is either extreme and ignorant or extreme with a lot of baggage. Hey, go for it if he wants. I would vote for Powell, he is a republican military, sure to kick some ass. Powell is an intelligent former statesman and general. He's about as anti-war as you can get. I doubt he would be interested at this point, given his age and the baggage. As far as I am concerned "baggage" is really experience. That is particularly true in this case. I would really prefer someone who wasn't from the Bush/Clinton/Bush legacy. I am just not sure who it would be, I know I will be reminded I can't vote but here goes... ANYBODY but Obama. We got the bottom of the pond with that one. But but, pondscum floats. Sure was a dirty pond whee Obama came from. Really? I've been to Hawaii twice, and I found it to be a remarkable place. How many times have you been there? Not once. I prefer Costa Rica, Panama, Mexico. Have lived in 4 other countries too. Been to Europe. Probably been to at least 40 states on a visit or pass through. And you? Whole life in backwater USA? No, I've been around and to more countries and continents than you've mentioned. I do like Hawaii a lot, though. Beautiful, multi-cultural, terrific beaches, pretty mountains, fabulous local restaurants, et cetera. Wife has been to Hawaii. See seems to prefer the spanish touch. From what I hear of Hawaii, I would agree. But might get there in the next year or two. Say in 2 years if they still offer the 20 island cruise -- goes to more than Hawaii. 34 days on a cruise ship sounds interesting. But this year is out as we are looking for a retirement community in Panama or Costa Rica. Hope to have something in the next year. |
Biden to impeach Obama
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ｩ2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com