Harryk wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
Isn't it illegal to target foreign leaders for asassination? Yet they
attacked Gaddafi's home..........


Actually, Mr. Bat**** for Brains, the building that was attacked was
*not* the home, but a nearby building that serves as a C&C center.

I'm not sure why any of this is causing you grief. Why weren't you
whining when George W. "The Idiot" Bush was killing tens of thousand
of Iraqis?
Still overusing that dumb "bat****" line, WAFA?

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Frogwatch wrote:
Isn't it illegal to target foreign leaders for asassination? Yet they
attacked Gaddafi's home..........


Actually, Mr. Bat**** for Brains, the building that was attacked was
*not* the home, but a nearby building that serves as a C&C center.

I'm not sure why any of this is causing you grief. Why weren't you
whining when George W. "The Idiot" Bush was killing tens of thousand of
Iraqis?

I must have missed where Obama got Congress' approval to go to war.

On 21/03/2011 5:38 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:28:08 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Isn't it illegal to target foreign leaders for asassination? Yet they
attacked Gaddafi's home..........

since when is it illegal to do this if they're enemies of the US??

and no one is targetting gaddafi. sorry

Yeah golly gee, Obama said so!!! Must be true yuk, yuk...

I for one have come to the conclusion our policians be they US or
Canadian don't know how to tell the truth.

BAR wrote:
In articleYfydncMhfodKHRrQnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Frogwatch wrote:
Isn't it illegal to target foreign leaders for asassination? Yet they
attacked Gaddafi's home..........

Actually, Mr. Bat**** for Brains, the building that was attacked was
*not* the home, but a nearby building that serves as a C&C center.

I'm not sure why any of this is causing you grief. Why weren't you
whining when George W. "The Idiot" Bush was killing tens of thousand of
Iraqis?

I must have missed where Obama got Congress' approval to go to war.




The last Constitutionally correct war in which we engaged was WW II.
Obama sent a letter to Congress today outlining his reasons for
participating in the Libyan adventure.

On 21/03/2011 7:25 PM, Harryk wrote:
BAR wrote:
In articleYfydncMhfodKHRrQnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Frogwatch wrote:
Isn't it illegal to target foreign leaders for asassination? Yet they
attacked Gaddafi's home..........

Actually, Mr. Bat**** for Brains, the building that was attacked was
*not* the home, but a nearby building that serves as a C&C center.

I'm not sure why any of this is causing you grief. Why weren't you
whining when George W. "The Idiot" Bush was killing tens of thousand of
Iraqis?

I must have missed where Obama got Congress' approval to go to war.




The last Constitutionally correct war in which we engaged was WW II.
Obama sent a letter to Congress today outlining his reasons for
participating in the Libyan adventure.

But his real reason is to ask congress for more debt moneys. Obama
likes spending money. Running wase out of government is secondary.

For example how come not to persue the hundreds of billions of fraud on
Fannie Mae and Freddie Macs books? Here is the big scam being swept
under the rug.

You be poor, usually a minority. You buy a dump for cheap. Say you
fixed it up, then sell it for much more using easy Mae or Mac moneys.
You pocket the change from the gain. The new buyer of the house doesn't
even make a single payment, just waits for foreclosure. They share the
profits and taxpayers get the bill.

Huge waste. But isn't sexy like war on a little country of zero threat
to the USA.

On 21/03/2011 7:25 PM, Harryk wrote:
BAR wrote:
In articleYfydncMhfodKHRrQnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Frogwatch wrote:
Isn't it illegal to target foreign leaders for asassination? Yet they
attacked Gaddafi's home..........

Actually, Mr. Bat**** for Brains, the building that was attacked was
*not* the home, but a nearby building that serves as a C&C center.

I'm not sure why any of this is causing you grief. Why weren't you
whining when George W. "The Idiot" Bush was killing tens of thousand of
Iraqis?

I must have missed where Obama got Congress' approval to go to war.

The last Constitutionally correct war in which we engaged was WW II.
Obama sent a letter to Congress today outlining his reasons for
participating in the Libyan adventure.

On the war law he is using now, should have had the caviet only if USA
or treat allies is attacked. Stupid to give too much power to one
president.

I hear Ron Paul is challenging this. Mind you Obama did appoint his
birth certificate lawyer to the Supreme Court. Funny how that works.

Canuck57 wrote:
On 21/03/2011 7:25 PM, Harryk wrote:
BAR wrote:
In articleYfydncMhfodKHRrQnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Frogwatch wrote:
Isn't it illegal to target foreign leaders for asassination? Yet they
attacked Gaddafi's home..........

Actually, Mr. Bat**** for Brains, the building that was attacked was
*not* the home, but a nearby building that serves as a C&C center.

I'm not sure why any of this is causing you grief. Why weren't you
whining when George W. "The Idiot" Bush was killing tens of thousand of
Iraqis?

I must have missed where Obama got Congress' approval to go to war.




The last Constitutionally correct war in which we engaged was WW II.
Obama sent a letter to Congress today outlining his reasons for
participating in the Libyan adventure.

But his real reason is to ask congress for more debt moneys. Obama likes
spending money. Running wase out of government is secondary.


Are you the result of too much exposure to the radiation of Fox News and
the teahadists?

On Mar 21, 7:14*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
On 21/03/2011 5:38 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:28:08 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
*wrote:

Isn't it illegal to target foreign leaders for asassination? *Yet they
attacked *Gaddafi's home..........

since when is it illegal to do this if they're enemies of the US??

and no one is targetting gaddafi. sorry

Yeah golly gee, Obama said so!!! * Must be true yuk, yuk...

I for one have come to the conclusion our policians be they US or
Canadian don't know how to tell the truth.

And never did, nor ever shall.

On Mar 22, 7:41*am, TopBassDog wrote:
On Mar 21, 7:14*pm, Canuck57 wrote:



On 21/03/2011 5:38 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:28:08 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
*wrote:

Isn't it illegal to target foreign leaders for asassination? *Yet they
attacked *Gaddafi's home..........

since when is it illegal to do this if they're enemies of the US??

and no one is targetting gaddafi. sorry

Yeah golly gee, Obama said so!!! * Must be true yuk, yuk...

I for one have come to the conclusion our policians be they US or
Canadian don't know how to tell the truth.

And never did, nor ever shall.

I have built up my immunity to radiation by being exposed to x-rays.

In article 3e4a10ba-c06c-4fda-88a5-
,
says...

On Mar 22, 7:41*am, TopBassDog wrote:
On Mar 21, 7:14*pm, Canuck57 wrote:



On 21/03/2011 5:38 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:28:08 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
*wrote:

Isn't it illegal to target foreign leaders for asassination? *Yet they
attacked *Gaddafi's home..........

since when is it illegal to do this if they're enemies of the US??

and no one is targetting gaddafi. sorry

Yeah golly gee, Obama said so!!! * Must be true yuk, yuk...

I for one have come to the conclusion our policians be they US or
Canadian don't know how to tell the truth.

And never did, nor ever shall.

I have built up my immunity to radiation by being exposed to x-rays.

I heard a report that noted that some small doses of radiation are
possibly creating anti-bodies and can actually stop some forms of cancer
from getting started... Don't have a source though, I was half paying
attention.