Bush had congressional authorization for Iraq whereas Obama only has
it from the UN. Of course Obama sides with the UN that put Sudan and
Libya on the Human Rights council.

On 19/03/2011 6:40 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Bush had congressional authorization for Iraq whereas Obama only has
it from the UN. Of course Obama sides with the UN that put Sudan and
Libya on the Human Rights council.

Told everyone right from the onset, Obama was parachuted in to make
darned sure honest people don't get control in DC. Present good party
puppets, lots of money and sell Americans a rigged game. Last thing the
back room wanted was honest types like McCain/Palin.

Obama be marching to a different drummer. After all, UN, Saudi and
France ... funny the colonial mess France is leaving. Look up Ivory
Coast and Guania.

Latest has the US placing a carrier off the coast of Behrain. But here
is the kicker. While civilians get shot in Behrain, the carrier is
there to prevent Iran from getting involved. Making new enemys for sure.

So much for democracy in Behrain eh? Freaking hypocritical war this is
turning out to be!!!

The war machine has spoken!!

Canuck57 wrote:
"... honest types like McCain/Palin."


You really are bat**** crazy.

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 19:00:36 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 6:40 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Bush had congressional authorization for Iraq whereas Obama only has
it from the UN. Of course Obama sides with the UN that put Sudan and
Libya on the Human Rights council.

Told everyone right from the onset, Obama was parachuted in to make
darned sure honest people don't get control in DC. Present good party
puppets, lots of money and sell Americans a rigged game. Last thing the
back room wanted was honest types like McCain/Palin.

christ only knows what you're babbling about. obama has international
law behind him

bush spent a TRILLION and killed 4400 US troops and you ignore THAT

oh...obama's black...

Obama be marching to a different drummer. After all, UN, Saudi and
France ... funny the colonial mess France is leaving. Look up Ivory
Coast and Guania.

Latest has the US placing a carrier off the coast of Behrain. But here
is the kicker. While civilians get shot in Behrain, the carrier is
there to prevent Iran from getting involved. Making new enemys for sure.


uh no. the carrier's port is IN BAHRAIN!!

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:32:11 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

Canuck57 wrote:
"... honest types like McCain/Palin."


You really are bat**** crazy.

They both are... or, all four actually.

In article ,
says...

On 19/03/2011 6:40 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Bush had congressional authorization for Iraq whereas Obama only has
it from the UN. Of course Obama sides with the UN that put Sudan and
Libya on the Human Rights council.

Told everyone right from the onset, Obama was parachuted in to make
darned sure honest people don't get control in DC. Present good party
puppets, lots of money and sell Americans a rigged game. Last thing the
back room wanted was honest types like McCain/Palin.

Obama be marching to a different drummer. After all, UN, Saudi and
France ... funny the colonial mess France is leaving. Look up Ivory
Coast and Guania.

Latest has the US placing a carrier off the coast of Behrain. But here
is the kicker. While civilians get shot in Behrain, the carrier is
there to prevent Iran from getting involved. Making new enemys for sure.

So much for democracy in Behrain eh? Freaking hypocritical war this is
turning out to be!!!

The war machine has spoken!!


Hey Canuck, the home port of the US 5th Fleet is Bahrain.

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:40:30 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Bush had congressional authorization for Iraq whereas Obama only has
it from the UN. Of course Obama sides with the UN that put Sudan and
Libya on the Human Rights council.

Oh, if Bush only had this much common sense....

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...-strategy.html

Following the "coalition of the willing" (not "leading" them while
they kicked and screamed... and quit.....)
No American troops on the ground...
Enforcement of the no-fly zone only by other nations...

So, they said it and you just believe it.. He said "enforcement of the
no fly zones by others:?? Well, 120 Tomahawk missiles and three B2
bombers that made a non stop trip to Libya and took out the deferences
and an airport or two?? But you still believe "no American involvement"
just because the idiot in chief said so on TV... Yeah, he said sunshine
and change from corruption too.. Now he is dithering trying to get GE a
lifetime of making trains that won't go anywhere instead of handling the
problems he was elected to handle...

On 19/03/2011 8:32 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
"... honest types like McCain/Palin."

You really are bat**** crazy.

Hey, do you think elections are about the people?

Almost everyone you have ever vote for comes with strings attached. big
back room money buys elections. Get the right backers, gehto to
president in 10 years. Or smeer, smeer, smeer.

I say smeer as I have no doubt people were out to smeer Pailin, take the
daughter with a baby out of wedlock. But no mention Obama was a
pregnency marriage as he was conceve out of wedlock.

Media is managed. Pick a story like the middle easy and dig for the
differing views on the internet. Then compare it to what you see on TV.
Many facts are often omitted with deliberation on selling the current
politicial view. Most TV stations lost their objectivity years ago.

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 8:32 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
"... honest types like McCain/Palin."

You really are bat**** crazy.

Hey, do you think elections are about the people?

Almost everyone you have ever vote for comes with strings attached. big
back room money buys elections. Get the right backers, gehto to
president in 10 years. Or smeer, smeer, smeer.

I say smeer as I have no doubt people were out to smeer Pailin, take the
daughter with a baby out of wedlock. But no mention Obama was a
pregnency marriage as he was conceve out of wedlock.

Media is managed. Pick a story like the middle easy and dig for the
differing views on the internet. Then compare it to what you see on TV.
Many facts are often omitted with deliberation on selling the current
politicial view. Most TV stations lost their objectivity years ago.


Strings like, in the case of McCain, the onset of senility, or, in the
case of Palin, full-blown stupidity?

Palin got a lot of heat, not because her daughter had a child out of
wedlock, but because of what she did while a candidate and what she
said. It became apparent shortly after her nomination that she was an
uncurious airhead. She still is.

On 19/03/2011 8:37 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 19:00:36 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 6:40 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Bush had congressional authorization for Iraq whereas Obama only has
it from the UN. Of course Obama sides with the UN that put Sudan and
Libya on the Human Rights council.

Told everyone right from the onset, Obama was parachuted in to make
darned sure honest people don't get control in DC. Present good party
puppets, lots of money and sell Americans a rigged game. Last thing the
back room wanted was honest types like McCain/Palin.

christ only knows what you're babbling about. obama has international
law behind him

bush spent a TRILLION and killed 4400 US troops and you ignore THAT

oh...obama's black...

Obama be marching to a different drummer. After all, UN, Saudi and
France ... funny the colonial mess France is leaving. Look up Ivory
Coast and Guania.

Latest has the US placing a carrier off the coast of Behrain. But here
is the kicker. While civilians get shot in Behrain, the carrier is
there to prevent Iran from getting involved. Making new enemys for sure.


uh no. the carrier's port is IN BAHRAIN!!

Well, like I said, US taxpayers get the costs of protecting Saudi Arabia.