| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Warning to rec.boats
|
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/16/11 11:50 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:04:45 -0500, New Giant wrote: In , says... On 2/16/11 8:47 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. Lil W'hine has thrown in with Scott Ingersoll and Loogy. Why must you always bring loogy into discussion? Are you that infatuated with someone that you must post about him even though he's not posted here in a long, long time? Actually, that's the reason he does so. He knows Loogy isn't responding, so he doesn't need to worry about being harshly put down. 1. "He knows Loogy isn't responding...." Bull****. 2. "...he doesn't need to worry about being harshly put down..." I never worry about that. Think about it. Those who try are either right-wing turds or, in the case of loogy, mindless turds. Why worry about people like you? |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to rec.boats
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says... On 2/16/11 11:50 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:04:45 -0500, New Giant wrote: In , says... On 2/16/11 8:47 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. Lil W'hine has thrown in with Scott Ingersoll and Loogy. Why must you always bring loogy into discussion? Are you that infatuated with someone that you must post about him even though he's not posted here in a long, long time? Actually, that's the reason he does so. He knows Loogy isn't responding, so he doesn't need to worry about being harshly put down. 1. "He knows Loogy isn't responding...." Bull****. 2. "...he doesn't need to worry about being harshly put down..." I never worry about that. Think about it. Those who try are either right-wing turds or, in the case of loogy, mindless turds. Why worry about people like you? Harry, here's some words for you to think about: Te be persuasive, we must be believable. To be believable, we must be credible. To be credible, we must be truthful. Edward Mora If you'd only follow those simple rules, you'd have a much better relationship with others. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to rec.boats
In article ,
says... On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:04:45 -0500, New Giant Boat wrote: In article , says... On 2/16/11 8:47 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. Lil W'hine has thrown in with Scott Ingersoll and Loogy. Why must you always bring loogy into discussion? Are you that infatuated with someone that you must post about him even though he's not posted here in a long, long time? Actually, that's the reason he does so. He knows Loogy isn't responding, so he doesn't need to worry about being harshly put down. Kind of like Harry trying to say his school system was "top in the state", it's a lie. It was never the "top school in the state". Harry just made that up because he knows my system/town was voted best school system in the country twice in the late 60s to early 70s with one year the town of Manchester took the title between those two years and Harry figured he cold run with it, as he assumed I was not here anymore. As to why, you hit it on the head, he post this bull because he thinks he can get away with it, but that bull **** is just enough to bring me back out for one post  |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/16/11 4:06 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:04:45 -0500, New Giant wrote: In , says... On 2/16/11 8:47 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. Lil W'hine has thrown in with Scott Ingersoll and Loogy. Why must you always bring loogy into discussion? Are you that infatuated with someone that you must post about him even though he's not posted here in a long, long time? Actually, that's the reason he does so. He knows Loogy isn't responding, so he doesn't need to worry about being harshly put down. Kind of like Harry trying to say his school system was "top in the state", it's a lie. It was never the "top school in the state". Harry just made that up because he knows my system/town was voted best school system in the country twice in the late 60s to early 70s with one year the town of Manchester took the title between those two years and Harry figured he cold run with it, as he assumed I was not here anymore. As to why, you hit it on the head, he post this bull because he thinks he can get away with it, but that bull **** is just enough to bring me back out for one post 1. You said you were through here, or words to that effect. More of your buill****, I guess. 2. I don't know anything about your town in the late 1960's to early 1970s, or, in fact, any other time. I graduated high school in the early 1960s. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Warning to rec.boats | General | |||
| Warning to rec.boats | General | |||
| Is this prize winner a rec.boats or rec.boats.cruising denizen? | General | |||
| FAST-TRACK of RENAME uk.rec.boats.power to uk.rec.boats.motor | UK Power Boats | |||
| RFD: RENAME uk.rec.boats.power to uk.rec.boats.motor | UK Power Boats | |||
Hybrid Mode
