On 2/3/11 10:06 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleVsOdnQWr6_1jxdbQnZ2dnUVZ_o6dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/3/11 7:56 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...
You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.


"rigorous course in logic" Translation: Attempting to learn something that
is completely foreign to him.

Parse his other statement. Is he inferring that he was a member of a debate
team and that he actually debated?

His closing remark was just too weird to comment on.


He was the debate team manager. He carried the 3x5 cards for the members
of the team.


This from a few mooks who couldn't have made it through a two year
course of study at a community college?

Your jealousy is apparent.

Of what? Your going into the military instead of college...

Your inability to think logically?

Your inability to maintain an adult discussion?

Your circle of jerkoff right-wing buddies here?

Your belief in "birther-ism"?

Your "go-fer" job at a tech company?

Your lack of a boat?

Sorry, BertieBirther...you just don't have anything that interests me.

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Your jealousy is apparent.

Of what? Your going into the military instead of college...

Your inability to think logically?

Your inability to maintain an adult discussion?

Your circle of jerkoff right-wing buddies here?

Your belief in "birther-ism"?

Your "go-fer" job at a tech company?

Your lack of a boat?

Sorry, BertieBirther...you just don't have anything that interests me.

You are jealous of me.

On 2/4/11 7:35 AM, BAR wrote:
In article49ydnb4Ny8hefNbQnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Your jealousy is apparent.

Of what? Your going into the military instead of college...

Your inability to think logically?

Your inability to maintain an adult discussion?

Your circle of jerkoff right-wing buddies here?

Your belief in "birther-ism"?

Your "go-fer" job at a tech company?

Your lack of a boat?

Sorry, BertieBirther...you just don't have anything that interests me.

You are jealous of me.



I suppose that *is* what passes for a thought in your pea-brain.

On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 07:35:23 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article , payer3389
says...
Your jealousy is apparent.

Of what? Your going into the military instead of college...

Your inability to think logically?

Your inability to maintain an adult discussion?

Your circle of jerkoff right-wing buddies here?

Your belief in "birther-ism"?

Your "go-fer" job at a tech company?

Your lack of a boat?

Sorry, BertieBirther...you just don't have anything that interests me.

You are jealous of me.


Having met you both, I can state that Harry has good reason for his jealousy!

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...
You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.


"rigorous course in logic" Translation: Attempting to learn something
that
is completely foreign to him.

Parse his other statement. Is he inferring that he was a member of a
debate
team and that he actually debated?

His closing remark was just too weird to comment on.


He was the debate team manager. He carried the 3x5 cards for the members
of the team.


Likely, you are correct. I can't imagine him debating. After all, he's NEVER
shown us he's capable.

--
Ziggy®

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 07:35:23 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article , payer3389
says...
Your jealousy is apparent.

Of what? Your going into the military instead of college...

Your inability to think logically?

Your inability to maintain an adult discussion?

Your circle of jerkoff right-wing buddies here?

Your belief in "birther-ism"?

Your "go-fer" job at a tech company?

Your lack of a boat?

Sorry, BertieBirther...you just don't have anything that interests me.

You are jealous of me.


Having met you both, I can state that Harry has good reason for his
jealousy!


Now that we have an unbiased expert opinion that states the obvious, can we
close this case?

--
Ziggy®

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/3/11 10:06 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleVsOdnQWr6_1jxdbQnZ2dnUVZ_o6dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/3/11 7:56 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...
You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.


"rigorous course in logic" Translation: Attempting to learn something that
is completely foreign to him.

Parse his other statement. Is he inferring that he was a member of a debate
team and that he actually debated?

His closing remark was just too weird to comment on.


He was the debate team manager. He carried the 3x5 cards for the members
of the team.


This from a few mooks who couldn't have made it through a two year
course of study at a community college?

Your jealousy is apparent.

Of what? Your going into the military instead of college...

Many brave men did just that, coward.

Your inability to think logically?

Do you think that your position that everything conservative is bad,
everything liberal is good is logical?

Your inability to maintain an adult discussion?

Do you mean like your name calling and insulting every time someone
disagrees with you?

Your circle of jerkoff right-wing buddies here?

Not unlike you, Don and slammer, eh?

Your belief in "birther-ism"?

Your "go-fer" job at a tech company?

Your unemployment?

Your lack of a boat?

Your lack of a boat?

Sorry, BertieBirther...you just don't have anything that interests me.

Sorry, Harry, your lies don't interest me.

On 2/4/11 8:42 AM, John H wrote:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 07:35:23 -0500, wrote:

In article49ydnb4Ny8hefNbQnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Your jealousy is apparent.

Of what? Your going into the military instead of college...

Your inability to think logically?

Your inability to maintain an adult discussion?

Your circle of jerkoff right-wing buddies here?

Your belief in "birther-ism"?

Your "go-fer" job at a tech company?

Your lack of a boat?

Sorry, BertieBirther...you just don't have anything that interests me.

You are jealous of me.


Having met you both, I can state that Harry has good reason for his jealousy!


Doubt it. I'm not interested in your butt as BertieBirther is.

On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:53:36 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:37:57 -0800, wrote:

On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:29:05 -0500, wrote:



Why not invest in something we can grow instead of ripping apart the
earth's crust while spoiling the water table with toxins and dangerous
gases?

Because we are going to run out of water long before we run out of
oil.

So, we should make the problem worse by using fracking?

Did you just learn a new word?

? Are you trying to insult me? If so, try again.

No, it was just your one word answer to two posts in a row.
No offence intended

Ok. In any case, I pointed out that that technique isn't
pollution/risk free. In fact, it's pretty bad.


I agree there have been some problem in a few places with this but the
majority of the fracking does not hurt anyone.

Some problems? Lots of problems... igniting water from someone's tap
is pretty serious. Don't know about the majority. You mean more than
50%?

There have been a few problems, widely reported by the media but the
process has been harmless most of the times it is used.
What was that you said about the health care bill 'Fix the problems"

More than "a few problems." I'm happy to entertain the notion of
fixing the problems with fracking. Perhaps they can start by
disclosing the chemical mix they use.

Do you know of anything that doesn't affect someone?

Sure. If my cat pees on a bush and I don't know about it, I suspect
nobody is affected. Is that an equivalency attempt you're trying to
make?

I am trying to say "energy" is never going to be free of costs or even
dangers.

I agree. How about nuclear? France seems to be doing it safely. Oh
wait, the French can't be trusted... lol

On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 02:43:12 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:22:05 -0800, wrote:

On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:53:36 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:37:57 -0800, wrote:

On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:29:05 -0500, wrote:



Why not invest in something we can grow instead of ripping apart the
earth's crust while spoiling the water table with toxins and dangerous
gases?

Because we are going to run out of water long before we run out of
oil.

So, we should make the problem worse by using fracking?

Did you just learn a new word?

? Are you trying to insult me? If so, try again.

No, it was just your one word answer to two posts in a row.
No offence intended

Ok. In any case, I pointed out that that technique isn't
pollution/risk free. In fact, it's pretty bad.


I agree there have been some problem in a few places with this but the
majority of the fracking does not hurt anyone.

Some problems? Lots of problems... igniting water from someone's tap
is pretty serious. Don't know about the majority. You mean more than
50%?

There have been a few problems, widely reported by the media but the
process has been harmless most of the times it is used.
What was that you said about the health care bill 'Fix the problems"

More than "a few problems." I'm happy to entertain the notion of
fixing the problems with fracking. Perhaps they can start by
disclosing the chemical mix they use.

The problems I have heard are mostly because they were fracking too
close to the surface and in residential areas.

You mean that left up to the companies, who by the way deny
everything, we shouldn't have any gov't oversight because there aren't
any problems..

Do you know of anything that doesn't affect someone?

Sure. If my cat pees on a bush and I don't know about it, I suspect
nobody is affected. Is that an equivalency attempt you're trying to
make?

I am trying to say "energy" is never going to be free of costs or even
dangers.

I agree. How about nuclear? France seems to be doing it safely. Oh
wait, the French can't be trusted... lol

I am OK with nuclear but the waste is still a problem.

Yes, it's a problem, but there's got to be a trade-off.