On 2/3/11 9:01 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlevO6dnXU2Wdw3LtfQnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Slavery used to be "legal" in this country until we made it illegal.

Slavery is still practiced around the world. Why am I not surprised that
you are not concerned with the condition of man outside the USA?


My comments were about the United States. My comments were not about the
rest of the world. Since my comments were limited, you have no idea
whether my concerns extend to the rest of the world. Your response was
not logical.

Are you pro slavery outside the USA?

We can change the negative impacts corporations have on society.

Why would we want to devolve to an agrarian society? Why do you want to
return to the days of 18th century?

Again, your comment is not logical. I offered no suggestion that we go
back to an agrarian society. I do believe we can control corporations.

You are always obtuse.

There was nothing obtuse about my statements. When discussing making
slavery illegal, I clearly stated "this country." Perhaps you don't know
what obtuse means.



You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.

You're talking nonsense...again. The subject I raised was directed at
your inability to think logically and to debate. Commitment? Commitment
to what, in the context I raised?

Is your inability to engage in responsible, adult discussion an
outgrowth of your ducking out on formal education or your time in the
marines, or both?

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Slavery used to be "legal" in this country until we made it illegal.

Slavery is still practiced around the world. Why am I not surprised
that
you are not concerned with the condition of man outside the USA?


My comments were about the United States. My comments were not about the
rest of the world. Since my comments were limited, you have no idea
whether my concerns extend to the rest of the world. Your response was
not logical.

Are you pro slavery outside the USA?

We can change the negative impacts corporations have on society.

Why would we want to devolve to an agrarian society? Why do you want to
return to the days of 18th century?

Again, your comment is not logical. I offered no suggestion that we go
back to an agrarian society. I do believe we can control corporations.

You are always obtuse.

You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.


"rigorous course in logic" Translation: Attempting to learn something that
is completely foreign to him.

Parse his other statement. Is he inferring that he was a member of a debate
team and that he actually debated?

His closing remark was just too weird to comment on.

--
Ziggy®

"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Slavery used to be "legal" in this country until we made it illegal.

Slavery is still practiced around the world. Why am I not surprised
that
you are not concerned with the condition of man outside the USA?


My comments were about the United States. My comments were not about
the
rest of the world. Since my comments were limited, you have no idea
whether my concerns extend to the rest of the world. Your response was
not logical.

Are you pro slavery outside the USA?

We can change the negative impacts corporations have on society.

Why would we want to devolve to an agrarian society? Why do you want
to
return to the days of 18th century?

Again, your comment is not logical. I offered no suggestion that we go
back to an agrarian society. I do believe we can control corporations.

You are always obtuse.

You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.

OH NOOOOOO! You were not on a debate team! I guess this means you won't
get a job as a writer for a third rate sit-com...

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - Pain is temporary, Glory is forever!


You are insulting his former employer. You need to apologize. They made
first quality fish wrapping paper.

--
Ziggy®

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/2/11 5:12 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:38:39 -0800, wrote:

So, you think the small investor in a multinational has some actual
say in how the company is run and the ethics involved? It's only
recently that CEO pay has been on the table as needing non-binding
approval of the stockholders!

It doesn't really matter how much or how little say you have. If the
company is doing well, you share in the gains just like all of the
other owners. If it's not doing well you vote with your telephone and
sell the stock. Essentially you just fired the management.



Doing well only refers to one aspect of a corporation's performance,
typically. The problem is that corporations have become the actual
government in many countries, such as this one, and corporate actions
are destroying the middle class.

Really? Corporations are the government here? Do they maintain the
military? Make laws? That's about the most stupid statement you've made
about the U.S.A. and everyone here knows you hate this country. You CAN
leave you know?

In article ,
says...

On 2/3/11 9:01 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlevO6dnXU2Wdw3LtfQnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Slavery used to be "legal" in this country until we made it illegal.

Slavery is still practiced around the world. Why am I not surprised that
you are not concerned with the condition of man outside the USA?


My comments were about the United States. My comments were not about the
rest of the world. Since my comments were limited, you have no idea
whether my concerns extend to the rest of the world. Your response was
not logical.

Are you pro slavery outside the USA?

We can change the negative impacts corporations have on society.

Why would we want to devolve to an agrarian society? Why do you want to
return to the days of 18th century?

Again, your comment is not logical. I offered no suggestion that we go
back to an agrarian society. I do believe we can control corporations.

You are always obtuse.

There was nothing obtuse about my statements. When discussing making
slavery illegal, I clearly stated "this country." Perhaps you don't know
what obtuse means.



You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.

You're talking nonsense...again. The subject I raised was directed at
your inability to think logically and to debate. Commitment? Commitment
to what, in the context I raised?

Is your inability to engage in responsible, adult discussion an
outgrowth of your ducking out on formal education or your time in the
marines, or both?

And as usual, Harry starts losing the argument, the insults and name
calling start....

On 2/3/11 10:20 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

wrote in message
. ..
In articlevO6dnXU2Wdw3LtfQnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Slavery used to be "legal" in this country until we made it illegal.

Slavery is still practiced around the world. Why am I not surprised
that
you are not concerned with the condition of man outside the USA?


My comments were about the United States. My comments were not about the
rest of the world. Since my comments were limited, you have no idea
whether my concerns extend to the rest of the world. Your response was
not logical.

Are you pro slavery outside the USA?

We can change the negative impacts corporations have on society.

Why would we want to devolve to an agrarian society? Why do you want to
return to the days of 18th century?

Again, your comment is not logical. I offered no suggestion that we go
back to an agrarian society. I do believe we can control corporations.

You are always obtuse.

You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.


"rigorous course in logic" Translation: Attempting to learn something that
is completely foreign to him.

Parse his other statement. Is he inferring that he was a member of a debate
team and that he actually debated?

His closing remark was just too weird to comment on.

Funny, I didn't know debate teams had designated name callers! I would
still like to know what good "being clever" and being able to insult
people with snooty arrogant posturing has ever brought on society? I
mean, I think it's been a couple hundred years since "basket weaving"
and "story telling" (Harrytales, lies) has ever produced anything like a
usable product or jobs... Tell me, what is the product of a "clever
elitist name caller"?



Not to worry. No one will ever accuse you of being clever, elitist or
productive.

In article ,
says...
You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.


"rigorous course in logic" Translation: Attempting to learn something that
is completely foreign to him.

Parse his other statement. Is he inferring that he was a member of a debate
team and that he actually debated?

His closing remark was just too weird to comment on.


He was the debate team manager. He carried the 3x5 cards for the members
of the team.

On 2/3/11 7:56 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...
You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.


"rigorous course in logic" Translation: Attempting to learn something that
is completely foreign to him.

Parse his other statement. Is he inferring that he was a member of a debate
team and that he actually debated?

His closing remark was just too weird to comment on.


He was the debate team manager. He carried the 3x5 cards for the members
of the team.


This from a few mooks who couldn't have made it through a two year
course of study at a community college?

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/3/11 7:56 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...
You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.


"rigorous course in logic" Translation: Attempting to learn something that
is completely foreign to him.

Parse his other statement. Is he inferring that he was a member of a debate
team and that he actually debated?

His closing remark was just too weird to comment on.


He was the debate team manager. He carried the 3x5 cards for the members
of the team.


This from a few mooks who couldn't have made it through a two year
course of study at a community college?

Your jealousy is apparent.

On Feb 2, 7:28*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:39:36 -0500, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:38:39 -0800, wrote:

So, you think the small investor in a multinational has some actual
say in how the company is run and the ethics involved? It's only
recently that CEO pay has been on the table as needing non-binding
approval of the stockholders!

It doesn't really matter *how much or how little say you have. *If the
company is doing well, you share in the gains just like all of the
other owners. *If it's not doing well you vote with your telephone and
sell the stock. *Essentially you just fired the management.

The last six months have been very good to me. I have an unrealized gain
in one company of about 45%.

Thus, Obama is destroying the country...

Your words?