On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,
wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll get over
it.


But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

On Jan 30, 5:32*pm, "Paul@BYC" wrote:
On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,
wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll get over
it.

But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

Eric Clapton would say, "Before you accuse me, take a look at
yourself...". You're no better than anyone you named, and you're
defending harry who dragged in someone's spouse. That's low, and you
are on his side?

If you don't see that and apologize, you're an asshole, paul.

On 1/30/11 5:42 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Jan 30, 5:32 pm, wrote:
On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,
wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll get over
it.

But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

Eric Clapton would say, "Before you accuse me, take a look at
yourself...". You're no better than anyone you named, and you're
defending harry who dragged in someone's spouse. That's low, and you
are on his side?

If you don't see that and apologize, you're an asshole, paul.

Why should Paul apologize? He called a spade a spade. Besides, Herring
is trying to present himself as some sort of paragon of behavioral
virtue here, which is hypocritical bull****. I haven't noticed Paul
trying to do that.

Also note that Herring dragged in my mother. Is that the same or worse
than dragging in someone's spouse?

Harryk wrote:
On 1/30/11 5:42 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Jan 30, 5:32 pm, wrote:
On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,

wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts.
He'll get over
it.

But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

Eric Clapton would say, "Before you accuse me, take a look at
yourself...". You're no better than anyone you named, and you're
defending harry who dragged in someone's spouse. That's low, and you
are on his side?

If you don't see that and apologize, you're an asshole, paul.

Why should Paul apologize? He called a spade a spade. Besides, Herring
is trying to present himself as some sort of paragon of behavioral
virtue here, which is hypocritical bull****. I haven't noticed Paul
trying to do that.

Also note that Herring dragged in my mother. Is that the same or worse
than dragging in someone's spouse?





Of course you haven't noticed what Paul has posted. You live with
blinders on your bald head.

On 1/30/2011 5:42 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Jan 30, 5:32 pm, wrote:
On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,
wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll get over
it.

But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

Eric Clapton would say, "Before you accuse me, take a look at
yourself...". You're no better than anyone you named, and you're
defending harry who dragged in someone's spouse. That's low, and you
are on his side?

If you don't see that and apologize, you're an asshole, paul.


Might you be willing to point out that post of yours in which you
castigated Herring for dragging in Harry's mother? I must have missed
it. I'll admit to skipping most of what is posted here.

On Jan 30, 6:02*pm, "Paul@BYC" wrote:
On 1/30/2011 5:42 PM, Jack. wrote:





On Jan 30, 5:32 pm, *wrote:
On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,
wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll get over
it.

But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

Eric Clapton would say, "Before you accuse me, take a look at
yourself...". *You're no better than anyone you named, and you're
defending harry who dragged in someone's spouse. *That's low, and you
are on his side?

If you don't see that and apologize, you're an asshole, paul.

Might you be willing to point out that post of yours in which you
castigated Herring for dragging in Harry's mother? I must have missed
it. I'll admit to skipping most of what is posted here.

Might you be willing to point out that post in which you castigated
harry for *any* of his bad behavior?

You are defining yourself.

In article ,
says...

On 1/30/2011 5:42 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Jan 30, 5:32 pm, wrote:
On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,
wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll get over
it.

But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

Eric Clapton would say, "Before you accuse me, take a look at
yourself...". You're no better than anyone you named, and you're
defending harry who dragged in someone's spouse. That's low, and you
are on his side?

If you don't see that and apologize, you're an asshole, paul.


Might you be willing to point out that post of yours in which you
castigated Herring for dragging in Harry's mother? I must have missed
it. I'll admit to skipping most of what is posted here.

Most new people to the group with the alleged intelligence and intellect
you claim to posses would have taken a look around and either walked
away or laughed at the lot of us. Yet, you jumped into Harry's backseat
very quickly.

Why?

"BAR" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
says...

On 1/30/2011 5:42 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Jan 30, 5:32 pm, wrote:
On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,

wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll
get over
it.

But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you
also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

Eric Clapton would say, "Before you accuse me, take a look at
yourself...". You're no better than anyone you named, and you're
defending harry who dragged in someone's spouse. That's low, and you
are on his side?

If you don't see that and apologize, you're an asshole, paul.


Might you be willing to point out that post of yours in which you
castigated Herring for dragging in Harry's mother? I must have missed
it. I'll admit to skipping most of what is posted here.

Most new people to the group with the alleged intelligence and intellect
you claim to posses would have taken a look around and either walked
away or laughed at the lot of us. Yet, you jumped into Harry's backseat
very quickly.

Why?



They drink from the same toilet.

--
Ziggy®

"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article e7e7f2c8-180b-42f8-a192-5d011c558975
@k17g2000pre.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jan 30, 5:32 pm, "Paul@BYC" wrote:
On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,

wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll
get over
it.

But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

Eric Clapton would say, "Before you accuse me, take a look at
yourself...". You're no better than anyone you named, and you're
defending harry who dragged in someone's spouse. That's low, and you
are on his side?

If you don't see that and apologize, you're an asshole, paul.

Paul is just being dishonest again.. I have attacked nobody, all I have
done is responded to Don and Harrys continuous taunting day after day,
post after post... Paul is just another liar, just plunk the puss...

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - Pain is temporary, Glory is forever!

You simple little piece of ****... you consider what you said about my son
as "responding"??

In article , princecraft49
@gmail.com says...

"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article e7e7f2c8-180b-42f8-a192-5d011c558975
@k17g2000pre.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jan 30, 5:32 pm, "Paul@BYC" wrote:
On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,

wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll
get over
it.

But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

Eric Clapton would say, "Before you accuse me, take a look at
yourself...". You're no better than anyone you named, and you're
defending harry who dragged in someone's spouse. That's low, and you
are on his side?

If you don't see that and apologize, you're an asshole, paul.

Paul is just being dishonest again.. I have attacked nobody, all I have
done is responded to Don and Harrys continuous taunting day after day,
post after post... Paul is just another liar, just plunk the puss...

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - Pain is temporary, Glory is forever!

You simple little piece of ****... you consider what you said about my son
as "responding"??

Do you consider the **** you've said about Scotty and his daughter as
"responding", you simple little piece of ****?