On 1/30/11 7:52 PM, Gene wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:43:59 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Jan 30, 6:41 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:42:51 -0800 (PST), "Jack."





wrote:
On Jan 30, 5:32 pm, wrote:
On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,
wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll get over
it.

But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

Eric Clapton would say, "Before you accuse me, take a look at
yourself...". You're no better than anyone you named, and you're
defending harry who dragged in someone's spouse. That's low, and you
are on his side?

If you don't see that and apologize, you're an asshole, paul.

I'll take this, since I've already taken Harry to task. What do you
have to say about the thread entitled "According to Mrs Krause..."

I assume (could be wrong) that this stupid crap started, there....

If I've got this right John started it and Harry was injudicious
enough not to stop it.... at least by ignoring it...

C'mon, Gene... This is John's response to harry's "having a baby is
worse than having an abortion" troll. You know that, you responded to
that one too.

John did not start this little tidbit, he just took the bait.

You of all people should know that, at this point, you could never
point to anyone that "started" it, right?

Ther are no clean hands in this NG, including yours or mine. And
certainly not krause or tosk.

Hey, I had a good day today. Shot about 150 rounds, including my
friend's AR15. Cool weapon.

If I (or we) don't have clean hands, it is hard to beat Tosk up for
his "contributions"....

This is a continuing "thing" with John. JPS has a fetish with guns....
Similarly, one of John's fetishes is whatever "choosing life" means to
him. His understanding of that, and a LOT of other things, have no
meaning if he can't contrast them with the opposite of what he
believes (which is, by definition, evil).

In comes Harry and the inevitable back and forth.... you will quickly
see that everybody is sooner or later called a "Harry" or "friend of
Harry" or the like...

This has gone on for decades, but has only recently become SO ANGRY...

Therein lies the problem....






And I work so hard *not* to have friends here... :)

On 1/30/11 9:07 PM, Gene wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SsUTLAhbWEOn Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:25:55 -0400, "True wrote:



"I am wrote in message
...
snip
I haven't been attacking anybody here at all... Unless noting that someone
is lying
about you is an attack..
snip... --
Rowdy Mouse Racing - Pain is temporary, Glory is forever!

LIAR!

Not necessarily... (headers?)....





You're kidding, right, Gene? Snotty is on the attack every day he is
here. I'm usually his target. It bothers me...not.

On 1/30/11 9:16 PM, Gene wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:09:21 -0500,
wrote:

On 1/30/11 9:07 PM, Gene wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SsUTLAhbWEOn Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:25:55 -0400, "True wrote:



"I am wrote in message
...
snip
I haven't been attacking anybody here at all... Unless noting that someone
is lying
about you is an attack..
snip... --
Rowdy Mouse Racing - Pain is temporary, Glory is forever!

LIAR!

Not necessarily... (headers?)....





You're kidding, right, Gene? Snotty is on the attack every day he is
here. I'm usually his target. It bothers me...not.

Yet, there is one spoofer (or more) targeting him.....

EVERYBODY NOTE:

There is one or more spoofers playing both sides of the fence. Wanna
look stoopid? Fine, play into their hands.....



No doubt the spoofers play both sides of the fence, but if anyone is
spoofing Snotty, it is Snotty.

On 1/31/11 6:43 AM, I am Tosk wrote:


Hey, **** you tooo.. I haven't been here attacking anybody, just
responding to name calling. You have been trolling here more than I
lately.. So screw off...


snerk

Snotty just keeps piling on the bull**** while claiming his innocence,
sort of like a poor man's John Herring.

In article ,
says...

On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,
wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll get over
it.


But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

You are full of ****.

In article ,
says...

On 1/30/2011 5:42 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Jan 30, 5:32 pm, wrote:
On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,
wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll get over
it.

But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

Eric Clapton would say, "Before you accuse me, take a look at
yourself...". You're no better than anyone you named, and you're
defending harry who dragged in someone's spouse. That's low, and you
are on his side?

If you don't see that and apologize, you're an asshole, paul.


Might you be willing to point out that post of yours in which you
castigated Herring for dragging in Harry's mother? I must have missed
it. I'll admit to skipping most of what is posted here.

Most new people to the group with the alleged intelligence and intellect
you claim to posses would have taken a look around and either walked
away or laughed at the lot of us. Yet, you jumped into Harry's backseat
very quickly.

Why?

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:31:05 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article e7e7f2c8-180b-42f8-a192-5d011c558975
, says...

On Jan 30, 5:32*pm, "Paul@BYC" wrote:
On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,
wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll get over
it.

But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

Eric Clapton would say, "Before you accuse me, take a look at
yourself...". You're no better than anyone you named, and you're
defending harry who dragged in someone's spouse. That's low, and you
are on his side?

If you don't see that and apologize, you're an asshole, paul.

Paul is just being dishonest again.. I have attacked nobody, all I have
done is responded to Don and Harrys continuous taunting day after day,
post after post... Paul is just another liar, just plunk the puss...

WTF? I don't think anybody even mentioned you.... you really don't
have a dog in this fight. This is pretty much about Harry and John.

Nobody has accused you of anything... so far as I can determine...

You missed the part of Paul's post where specifically identified "Tosk".

Open your eyes Gene.

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,

wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll
get over
it.


But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

You are full of ****.

You should flush him then.
--
Ziggy®

"BAR" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
says...

On 1/30/2011 5:42 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Jan 30, 5:32 pm, wrote:
On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,

wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll
get over
it.

But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you
also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

Eric Clapton would say, "Before you accuse me, take a look at
yourself...". You're no better than anyone you named, and you're
defending harry who dragged in someone's spouse. That's low, and you
are on his side?

If you don't see that and apologize, you're an asshole, paul.


Might you be willing to point out that post of yours in which you
castigated Herring for dragging in Harry's mother? I must have missed
it. I'll admit to skipping most of what is posted here.

Most new people to the group with the alleged intelligence and intellect
you claim to posses would have taken a look around and either walked
away or laughed at the lot of us. Yet, you jumped into Harry's backseat
very quickly.

Why?



They drink from the same toilet.

--
Ziggy®

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

Trash is trash.