On 1/30/11 10:19 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:31:44 -0500, wrote:

In article9fCdnU6RUJa7J9nQnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 1/29/11 7:59 PM, BAR wrote:
In articlesNCdnf2FWJ48e9_QnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 1/28/11 10:37 AM, John H wrote:
Almost 'nuff said.

Some folks should have learned from their parents' mistake and practice birth
control. Then all these abortions wouldn't be necessay.

There's our boy Herring, once again demonstrating he is an out of
control right-wing scumbag.

The article youare misquoting, by the way, was published in the New
England Journal of Medicine, not the favorite publication of mindless,
racist righties like you, I am sure.

Just think of how much bigger and stronger the Democrat party could have
been if you didn't kill off all of the potential new members. Hell, you
wouldn't have to deal with wooing the independents each election cycle.




Another example of your inability to reason and think, eh, BertieBirther?

Conservatives = 40%
Non-aligned = 40%
Liberals = 20%

The numbers speak for themselves.


He's just trying to keep this thread alive 'cause he knows the title is true.

Uh huh...as if the opinion of a racist pig like you matters, herring.

Making the subject line more accurate.

On Jan 30, 10:35*am, Harryk wrote:
Making the subject line more accurate.

Harry, I'd normally not respond to this, but when I asked my wife, she
said, "I don't know where Harry got that idea. I've never said his
wife is a real asshole."

Perhaps, like Donnie, you should read your posts before hitting the
button.

On 1/31/11 10:13 AM, John H wrote:
On Jan 30, 10:35 am, wrote:
Making the subject line more accurate.

Harry, I'd normally not respond to this, but when I asked my wife, she
said, "I don't know where Harry got that idea. I've never said his
wife is a real asshole."

Perhaps, like Donnie, you should read your posts before hitting the
button.


Your attempts to be "clever" fall flat, Mr. Asshole.

"Harryk" wrote in message
m...
On 1/31/11 10:13 AM, John H wrote:
On Jan 30, 10:35 am, wrote:
Making the subject line more accurate.

Harry, I'd normally not respond to this, but when I asked my wife, she
said, "I don't know where Harry got that idea. I've never said his
wife is a real asshole."

Perhaps, like Donnie, you should read your posts before hitting the
button.


Your attempts to be "clever" fall flat, Mr. Asshole.

Clever doesn't come natural to that washed-up army officer.

In article , princecraft49
@gmail.com says...

"Harryk" wrote in message
m...
On 1/31/11 10:13 AM, John H wrote:
On Jan 30, 10:35 am, wrote:
Making the subject line more accurate.

Harry, I'd normally not respond to this, but when I asked my wife, she
said, "I don't know where Harry got that idea. I've never said his
wife is a real asshole."

Perhaps, like Donnie, you should read your posts before hitting the
button.


Your attempts to be "clever" fall flat, Mr. Asshole.

Clever doesn't come natural to that washed-up army officer.

Another stupid post by Don showing that he wants nothing more here than
to be a yes-boy for Harry.

Harryk wrote:
Making the subject line more accurate.
Really? You have too much information out there for this kind of
bull****, WAFA. Keep it up...

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll get over
it.

On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,
wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll get over
it.


But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

On Jan 30, 5:32*pm, "Paul@BYC" wrote:
On 1/30/2011 5:19 PM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:49 -0500,
wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:35:37 -0500,
wrote:

Making the subject line more accurate.

You know, when you perpetuate this childish crap.... it isn't making
you look better or anybody else look worse....

.... hop out of the sand box and go boating...

He's just ****ed that I won't respond to his continuous taunts. He'll get over
it.

But you do respond. I went through at least a dozen of your posts in
which you were attempting to "taunt" Harry, and I skipped most of the
posts since I last visited here. There are several others here you also
try to taunt, including Gene. Are you not aware of your own bad
behavior? You're no better than LoogySpooker of "Tosk," or those whose
posts I've binned.

Eric Clapton would say, "Before you accuse me, take a look at
yourself...". You're no better than anyone you named, and you're
defending harry who dragged in someone's spouse. That's low, and you
are on his side?

If you don't see that and apologize, you're an asshole, paul.