On 1/18/11 9:26 AM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:22:03 -0500, wrote:

On 1/18/11 9:15 AM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:13:12 -0500, wrote:

On 1/18/11 9:11 AM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:49:24 -0500, wrote:

In ,
says...

keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

I thought the war in Iraq was to take their oil? Isn't that why
Haliburton was involved?

Not to get political, but I keep waiting for those folks to say they were wrong
- the ones who said Bush was just out to get Iraq's oil.

Speaking of presidents making money on oil, have you seen how gas prices have
gone up? Wonder where Obama and crew are putting all that wealth.


It's obvious now that Bush's goal was to bankrupt the country.

Ho, ho.

You're a joke, Harry.


Oh? That's what Reagan did, pretty much.

Laugh at your inanities?


You obviously are unaware of the long-term economic impact of Reagan
policies.

On 1/18/11 10:12 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In om,
says...

In ,
says...

keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

I thought the war in Iraq was to take their oil? Isn't that why
Haliburton was involved?

That's what all the lying pieces of **** said anyway.. Now that the
prices are going through the roof again, Pelosi and the traitor in
Chief, don't have **** to say.. Our first Black President will go down
in history as the worst thing that ever happened to our country..



Wow...how many steps away are you from those Second Amendment Remedies,
little stupid ****?

On 1/18/11 10:12 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
Our first Black President will go down
in history as the worst thing that ever happened to our country..


Worse, even, than your father refusing to wear a condom, an act of
omission that resulted in your conception?

"I am Tosk" wrote in message ...
In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

I thought the war in Iraq was to take their oil? Isn't that why
Haliburton was involved?

That's what all the lying pieces of **** said anyway.. Now that the
prices are going through the roof again, Pelosi and the traitor in
Chief, don't have **** to say.. Our first Black President will go down
in history as the worst thing that ever happened to our country..

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - Pain is temporary, Glory is forever!


While that definitely wasn't a racist statement, watch the accusers come out of the woodwork.

--
Ziggy®

In article ,
says...

On 1/18/11 10:12 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
Our first Black President will go down
in history as the worst thing that ever happened to our country..


Worse, even, than your father refusing to wear a condom, an act of
omission that resulted in your conception?

You always have to be a low life pig, huh? You remind me of slammer.

On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:13:12 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

On 1/18/11 9:11 AM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:49:24 -0500, wrote:

In ,
says...

keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

I thought the war in Iraq was to take their oil? Isn't that why
Haliburton was involved?

Not to get political, but I keep waiting for those folks to say they were wrong
- the ones who said Bush was just out to get Iraq's oil.

Speaking of presidents making money on oil, have you seen how gas prices have
gone up? Wonder where Obama and crew are putting all that wealth.


It's obvious now that Bush's goal was to bankrupt the country.

Herring and Bertie Poop. They still don't realize the depth of
stupidity and poor planning (if there was any beyond their wild
assumptions) exhibited by Bush, Cheney and the rest of the PNAC crew.

No surprise here.

On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:22:57 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

On 1/18/11 10:12 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In om,
says...

In ,
says...

keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

I thought the war in Iraq was to take their oil? Isn't that why
Haliburton was involved?

That's what all the lying pieces of **** said anyway.. Now that the
prices are going through the roof again, Pelosi and the traitor in
Chief, don't have **** to say.. Our first Black President will go down
in history as the worst thing that ever happened to our country..



Wow...how many steps away are you from those Second Amendment Remedies,
little stupid ****?

It's pretty amazing how far from reality these ne'r do wells drift.

Snotty is a classic example of the six pack vote.

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:13:12 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

On 1/18/11 9:11 AM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:49:24 -0500, wrote:

In ,
says...

keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

I thought the war in Iraq was to take their oil? Isn't that why
Haliburton was involved?

Not to get political, but I keep waiting for those folks to say they were wrong
- the ones who said Bush was just out to get Iraq's oil.

Speaking of presidents making money on oil, have you seen how gas prices have
gone up? Wonder where Obama and crew are putting all that wealth.


It's obvious now that Bush's goal was to bankrupt the country.

Herring and Bertie Poop. They still don't realize the depth of
stupidity and poor planning (if there was any beyond their wild
assumptions) exhibited by Bush, Cheney and the rest of the PNAC crew.

No surprise here.

Insulting and name calling sure makes you look intelligent.

On 1/18/11 1:10 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:13:12 -0500,
wrote:

On 1/18/11 9:11 AM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:49:24 -0500, wrote:

In ,
says...

keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

I thought the war in Iraq was to take their oil? Isn't that why
Haliburton was involved?

Not to get political, but I keep waiting for those folks to say they were wrong
- the ones who said Bush was just out to get Iraq's oil.

Speaking of presidents making money on oil, have you seen how gas prices have
gone up? Wonder where Obama and crew are putting all that wealth.


It's obvious now that Bush's goal was to bankrupt the country.

Herring and Bertie Poop. They still don't realize the depth of
stupidity and poor planning (if there was any beyond their wild
assumptions) exhibited by Bush, Cheney and the rest of the PNAC crew.

No surprise here.

I think the Dubya Bush Admin "thinking" went something like this:

"We got our butts handed to us on 9-11, we've gotten nowhere looking for
bin Laden, the American people want us to take action and if we don't,
we'll be voted out in 2004, so...let's trump up a war against Saddam
Hussein."

Despite the protestations against war you hear from many in the
military, the reality is that a war is the best way for more of the
military to stay in uniform and obtain promotions.

On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:11:24 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:49:24 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

I thought the war in Iraq was to take their oil? Isn't that why
Haliburton was involved?

Not to get political, but I keep waiting for those folks to say they were wrong
- the ones who said Bush was just out to get Iraq's oil.

Speaking of presidents making money on oil, have you seen how gas prices have
gone up? Wonder where Obama and crew are putting all that wealth.

Bush was out to get the oil. Remove the word "just" and you'd be
right.