keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:52:19 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:10:33 -0800, jps wrote:


keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

Actually, I wholeheartedly agree with Hannity, if they had asked....
but they didn't....

How about instead of starting another war, why don't we get Cheney,
Haliburton, and the Bush family to spend some of their money for doing
that.

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:52:19 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:10:33 -0800, jps wrote:


keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

Actually, I wholeheartedly agree with Hannity, if they had asked....
but they didn't....

Evidently, for Hannity (and who knows how many others), that doesn't
seem to matter.

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:56:40 -0800, wrote:

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:52:19 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:10:33 -0800, jps wrote:


keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

Actually, I wholeheartedly agree with Hannity, if they had asked....
but they didn't....

How about instead of starting another war, why don't we get Cheney,
Haliburton, and the Bush family to spend some of their money for doing
that.

Capital idea!!!

In article ,
says...

keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

I thought the war in Iraq was to take their oil? Isn't that why
Haliburton was involved?

On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:49:24 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

I thought the war in Iraq was to take their oil? Isn't that why
Haliburton was involved?

Not to get political, but I keep waiting for those folks to say they were wrong
- the ones who said Bush was just out to get Iraq's oil.

Speaking of presidents making money on oil, have you seen how gas prices have
gone up? Wonder where Obama and crew are putting all that wealth.

On 1/18/11 9:11 AM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:49:24 -0500, wrote:

In ,
says...

keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

I thought the war in Iraq was to take their oil? Isn't that why
Haliburton was involved?

Not to get political, but I keep waiting for those folks to say they were wrong
- the ones who said Bush was just out to get Iraq's oil.

Speaking of presidents making money on oil, have you seen how gas prices have
gone up? Wonder where Obama and crew are putting all that wealth.


It's obvious now that Bush's goal was to bankrupt the country.

On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:13:12 -0500, Harryk wrote:

On 1/18/11 9:11 AM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:49:24 -0500, wrote:

In ,
says...

keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

I thought the war in Iraq was to take their oil? Isn't that why
Haliburton was involved?

Not to get political, but I keep waiting for those folks to say they were wrong
- the ones who said Bush was just out to get Iraq's oil.

Speaking of presidents making money on oil, have you seen how gas prices have
gone up? Wonder where Obama and crew are putting all that wealth.


It's obvious now that Bush's goal was to bankrupt the country.

Ho, ho.

You're a joke, Harry.

On 1/18/11 9:15 AM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:13:12 -0500, wrote:

On 1/18/11 9:11 AM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:49:24 -0500, wrote:

In ,
says...

keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

I thought the war in Iraq was to take their oil? Isn't that why
Haliburton was involved?

Not to get political, but I keep waiting for those folks to say they were wrong
- the ones who said Bush was just out to get Iraq's oil.

Speaking of presidents making money on oil, have you seen how gas prices have
gone up? Wonder where Obama and crew are putting all that wealth.


It's obvious now that Bush's goal was to bankrupt the country.

Ho, ho.

You're a joke, Harry.


Oh? That's what Reagan did, pretty much.

On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:22:03 -0500, Harryk wrote:

On 1/18/11 9:15 AM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:13:12 -0500, wrote:

On 1/18/11 9:11 AM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:49:24 -0500, wrote:

In ,
says...

keep fueling and lubricating our boats with fossil-based fuels if we
did this...

" I say why isn't Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every
American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have
injured soldiers -- and why didn't they pay for their own liberation?
For the Kuwait oil minister -- how short his memory is. You know, we
have every right to go in there and frankly take all their oil and
make them pay for the liberation."

Sean Hannity

All it would require is another invasion. Troops are already there so
why not? It's why we went there in the first place.

I thought the war in Iraq was to take their oil? Isn't that why
Haliburton was involved?

Not to get political, but I keep waiting for those folks to say they were wrong
- the ones who said Bush was just out to get Iraq's oil.

Speaking of presidents making money on oil, have you seen how gas prices have
gone up? Wonder where Obama and crew are putting all that wealth.


It's obvious now that Bush's goal was to bankrupt the country.

Ho, ho.

You're a joke, Harry.


Oh? That's what Reagan did, pretty much.

Laugh at your inanities?