Off T: She didn't make the list
 

On 12/18/10 8:22 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"Ziggy®" wrote in message
...
"HarryK" wrote in message
...
On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote:
HarryK wrote:
On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:





On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am
wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he

http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...



Nor he

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...



Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little
in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in
the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she
was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes
really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the
president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can
be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can*
believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like
Chelsea in
your younger years.

You crack me up. :-


Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest
honors.
She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a
master's degree.
She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from
Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU.

She worked several years for a top management consulting organization
and for a venture capital group.

Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her
say she is well-mannered.

There is no record of public intoxication for her.

Nice try.

How are your kids doing?

Any of them at Oxford?
Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who
posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA.


Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as
many as "the contender."

Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of
snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you
make one, I award you a "Snotty."

thank you for your participation.




"Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your
side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're
going to have to award them yourself.

--
Ziggy®

I'm thinking community awards for trying to cleanup America.

Another Snotty for Canada's Snarky Contributor.

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

On 12/18/10 8:26 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829
@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote:
In article ,
says...





On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am
wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he


http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...



Nor he


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...



Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a
little in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like,
"this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of
the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing
up in the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked
when she was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing
time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're
slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated,
attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the
president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't
do it...

What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on
to it,
did they?

They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the
name calling and childish insults again.

Just like you, Ingersoll.....

Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really
don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I
fight back...

--

You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again?


The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's
snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a
bunch of Snotties.



Don it is important to realize that when I make up the rules to my new
game, you need to follow them. I have been ignoring your snotty
comments, but everyone else realizes that my awards are only awarded to
those I want to insult.

Reread my rules sent via email.

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

On 12/18/10 8:29 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:22 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"Ziggy®" wrote in message
...
"HarryK" wrote in message
...
On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote:
HarryK wrote:
On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:





On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am
wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he

http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...




Nor he

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...




Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little
in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing
up in
the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when
she
was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time.
:-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes
really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the
president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can
be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can*
believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like
Chelsea in
your younger years.

You crack me up. :-


Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest
honors.
She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was
awarded a
master's degree.
She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from
Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU.

She worked several years for a top management consulting organization
and for a venture capital group.

Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her
say she is well-mannered.

There is no record of public intoxication for her.

Nice try.

How are your kids doing?

Any of them at Oxford?
Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who
posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA.


Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as
many as "the contender."

Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of
snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you
make one, I award you a "Snotty."

thank you for your participation.




"Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your
side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're
going to have to award them yourself.

--
Ziggy®

I'm thinking community awards for trying to cleanup America.

Another Snotty for Canada's Snarky Contributor.


And yet another Snotty for the ID Spoofer.

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

"HarryK" wrote in message
...
On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829
@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote:
In article ,
says...





On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am
wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he


http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...


Nor he


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...


Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a
little in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like,
"this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of
the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing
up in the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked
when she was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing
time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're
slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated,
attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the
president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't
do it...

What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on
to it,
did they?

They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the
name calling and childish insults again.

Just like you, Ingersoll.....

Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really
don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I
fight back...

--

You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again?


The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty
comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of
Snotties.


Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll be
competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's what
they do.

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

On 12/18/10 8:32 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:26 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829
@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote:
In article ,
says...





On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am
wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he


http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...




Nor he


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...




Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a
little in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like,
"this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of
the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing
up in the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked
when she was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing
time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed
to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're
slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated,
attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the
president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't
do it...

What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on
to it,
did they?

They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started
the
name calling and childish insults again.

Just like you, Ingersoll.....

Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really
don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I
fight back...

--

You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again?


The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's
snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a
bunch of Snotties.



Don it is important to realize that when I make up the rules to my new
game, you need to follow them. I have been ignoring your snotty
comments, but everyone else realizes that my awards are only awarded to
those I want to insult.

Reread my rules sent via email.


Another Snotty for the ID Spoofer...

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

On 12/18/10 8:45 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"HarryK" wrote in message
...
On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829
@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote:
In article ,
says...





On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am
wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he


http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...



Nor he


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...



Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a
little in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like,
"this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of
the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing
up in the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked
when she was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing
time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed
to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're
slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated,
attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the
president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't
do it...

What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on
to it,
did they?

They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started
the
name calling and childish insults again.

Just like you, Ingersoll.....

Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really
don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I
fight back...

--

You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again?


The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's
snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a
bunch of Snotties.


Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll
be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's
what they do.

Another Snotty to my favorite Snarky.

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

On 12/18/10 8:45 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"HarryK" wrote in message
...
On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829
@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote:
In article ,
says...





On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am
wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he


http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...



Nor he


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...



Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a
little in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like,
"this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of
the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing
up in the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked
when she was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing
time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed
to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're
slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated,
attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the
president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't
do it...

What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on
to it,
did they?

They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started
the
name calling and childish insults again.

Just like you, Ingersoll.....

Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really
don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I
fight back...

--

You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again?


The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's
snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a
bunch of Snotties.


Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll
be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's
what they do.


I can't argue against what you are saying there. But there's no reason
to play their game. If all they can do is insult other posters, then
that will be very obvious. We should refrain from playing along with that.

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

On 12/18/10 8:46 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:45 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"HarryK" wrote in message
...
On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829
@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote:
In article ,

says...





On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am
wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he


http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...




Nor he


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...




Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a
little in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like,
"this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of
the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing
up in the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked
when she was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing
time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed
to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're
slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated,
attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the
president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't
do it...

What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on
to it,
did they?

They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started
the
name calling and childish insults again.

Just like you, Ingersoll.....

Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really
don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is
when I
fight back...

--

You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again?


The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's
snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a
bunch of Snotties.


Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll
be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's
what they do.

Another Snotty to my favorite Snarky.

The ID spoofer earns another snotty...13 so far today.

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

On 12/18/10 8:53 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:45 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"HarryK" wrote in message
...
On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829
@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote:
In article ,

says...





On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am
wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he


http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...




Nor he


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...




Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a
little in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like,
"this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of
the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing
up in the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked
when she was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing
time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed
to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're
slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated,
attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the
president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't
do it...

What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on
to it,
did they?

They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started
the
name calling and childish insults again.

Just like you, Ingersoll.....

Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really
don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is
when I
fight back...

--

You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again?


The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's
snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a
bunch of Snotties.


Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll
be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's
what they do.


I can't argue against what you are saying there. But there's no reason
to play their game. If all they can do is insult other posters, then
that will be very obvious. We should refrain from playing along with that.


PS - I take back all of the Snotty's I award you, you were screwing up
my statistics.

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

On 12/18/10 8:55 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:53 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:45 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"HarryK" wrote in message
...
On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829
@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote:
In article ,

says...





On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,

payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am
wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he


http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...





Nor he


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...





Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up
a
little in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like,
"this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is
one of
the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of
growing
up in the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked
when she was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing
time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed
to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're
slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these
guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated,

attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of
the
president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under
the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you
couldn't
do it...

What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on
to it,
did they?

They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started
the
name calling and childish insults again.

Just like you, Ingersoll.....

Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really
don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is
when I
fight back...

--

You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again?


The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's
snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a
bunch of Snotties.


Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll
be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's
what they do.


I can't argue against what you are saying there. But there's no reason
to play their game. If all they can do is insult other posters, then
that will be very obvious. We should refrain from playing along with
that.


PS - I take back all of the Snotty's I award you, you were screwing up
my statistics.

Another Snotty to the Spoofer.