|
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:15 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. Another Snotty for Ziggy. I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice. Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side. LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties." My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see. Ah. A window into the mind of a student of the liberal arts. Not much to see, I'm afraid Another Snotty for you for your personal insult. The point is that it is posters on your side of the fence who post most of the personal insults here. Every Snotty you earn helps prove my point. Thank you and have an insult-free day. And I would like to highlight that no one could ever consider my "Snottys" to be considered an insult. They are my way of improving the tone of rec.boats. I have been an inspiration to rec.boaters for over 15 yrs. and my "Snottys" are just another one of my imaginative innovations for my fans. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:19 AM, YukonBound wrote:
"HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:09 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 9:43 PM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 9:24 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 6:16 PM, HarryK wrote: You tell the biggest whoppers, but that is why I like you. We talk about Kruger at least 10 times a day. One "Snotty" for the Harry spoofer. One "lobsta boat" for Harry... One "Snotty" for Scotty. Two for him so far since 4:45 pm. He's making up for lost time. I'm just keeping track, not commenting on the content, other than to point out "Snotties." And every post is a troll, so far you have about trolls today just yourself... So keep counting... Another Snotty for Scotty. He deserved two this time... for his bad grammar. Another Snotty for Don White. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:20 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:15 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. Another Snotty for Ziggy. I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice. Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side. LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties." My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see. Ah. A window into the mind of a student of the liberal arts. Not much to see, I'm afraid Another Snotty for you for your personal insult. The point is that it is posters on your side of the fence who post most of the personal insults here. Every Snotty you earn helps prove my point. Thank you and have an insult-free day. And I would like to highlight that no one could ever consider my "Snottys" to be considered an insult. They are my way of improving the tone of rec.boats. I have been an inspiration to rec.boaters for over 15 yrs. and my "Snottys" are just another one of my imaginative innovations for my fans. Another Snotty for the ID spoofer. Five so far today. I'm just keeping track of the insults. Thank you for playing. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
"Ziggy®" wrote in message ... "HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. -- Ziggy® I'm thinking community awards for trying to cleanup America. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:19 AM, YukonBound wrote:
"HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:09 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 9:43 PM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 9:24 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 6:16 PM, HarryK wrote: You tell the biggest whoppers, but that is why I like you. We talk about Kruger at least 10 times a day. One "Snotty" for the Harry spoofer. One "lobsta boat" for Harry... One "Snotty" for Scotty. Two for him so far since 4:45 pm. He's making up for lost time. I'm just keeping track, not commenting on the content, other than to point out "Snotties." And every post is a troll, so far you have about trolls today just yourself... So keep counting... Another Snotty for Scotty. He deserved two this time... for his bad grammar. No need to slide down that slope. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:20 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:19 AM, YukonBound wrote: "HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:09 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 9:43 PM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 9:24 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 6:16 PM, HarryK wrote: You tell the biggest whoppers, but that is why I like you. We talk about Kruger at least 10 times a day. One "Snotty" for the Harry spoofer. One "lobsta boat" for Harry... One "Snotty" for Scotty. Two for him so far since 4:45 pm. He's making up for lost time. I'm just keeping track, not commenting on the content, other than to point out "Snotties." And every post is a troll, so far you have about trolls today just yourself... So keep counting... Another Snotty for Scotty. He deserved two this time... for his bad grammar. Another Snotty for Don White. Another Snotty for the ID spoofer. Six so far today. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
"I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On Dec 17, 4:46*pm, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:01:39 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. *Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. *Two or three are complete fabrications. *Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. *:- This isn't that funny actually... http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...hdaughters.htm 05/31/2001 - Updated 11:32 PM ET Bush daughters cited in Texas Up-to-date-news, eh, D'Plume? |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote:
"I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com