Off T: She didn't make the list
 

"I am Tosk" wrote in message ...
In article ,
says...

Jack. wrote:
On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote:

In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
, says...




Yuo didn't make it he


http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...


Nor he


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...


Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :-


I was thinking the same thing. She will hit the wall soon enough and
look even more like her mother.

She hit a wall 20 years ago... You can still see the marks on her face
where they were touching her with the ten foot poles...

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - Pain is temporary, Glory is forever!


Knock it off guys.

--
Ziggy®

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote:
HarryK wrote:
On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:





On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he

http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...


Nor he

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...


Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little
in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in
the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she
was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can
be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can*
believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in
your younger years.

You crack me up. :-


Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors.
She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a
master's degree.
She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from
Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU.

She worked several years for a top management consulting organization
and for a venture capital group.

Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her
say she is well-mannered.

There is no record of public intoxication for her.

Nice try.

How are your kids doing?

Any of them at Oxford?
Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who
posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA.


Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as
many as "the contender."

Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of
snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you
make one, I award you a "Snotty."

thank you for your participation.




"Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself.


Another Snotty for Ziggy.

I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice.

Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the
negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a
couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i
started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side.
LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other
posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties."

My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this
newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see.

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

"HarryK" wrote in message ...
On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote:
HarryK wrote:
On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:





On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he

http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...


Nor he

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...


Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little
in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in
the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she
was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can
be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can*
believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in
your younger years.

You crack me up. :-


Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors.
She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a
master's degree.
She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from
Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU.

She worked several years for a top management consulting organization
and for a venture capital group.

Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her
say she is well-mannered.

There is no record of public intoxication for her.

Nice try.

How are your kids doing?

Any of them at Oxford?
Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who
posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA.


Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as
many as "the contender."

Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of
snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you
make one, I award you a "Snotty."

thank you for your participation.




"Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself.

--
Ziggy®

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

"Califbill" wrote in message m...
"HarryK" wrote in message
...

On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
, says...



Yuo didn't make it he

http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...

Nor he

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...

Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?


Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

Reply:
Chelsea was filmed several times during college passed out or extremely
drunk. Probably inhaled unlike her dad. So maybe the rest of your guesses
score a zero also.


She'd better cool it if she doesn't want to end up whit an alcoholic's nose like YOU KNOW WHO.

--
Ziggy®

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

In article ,
says...

On 12/17/10 3:59 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On 12/17/10 3:08 PM, BAR wrote:


I'll bet you are jealous. You couldn't get near an ivy league school nor
would England let you anywhere near Oxford or Cambridge.


Another of your fantasies, eh? How the hell would you know my college
capabilities? After all, it's not as if you succeeded in pursuing a
college degree. You didn't have the intellectual wherewithal to even
complete a course of study at Montgomery College. Did you even graduate
from high school?

Maybe, maybe not. But, I still make more money than you and that is what
****es you off to no end.

Oh no, not that piece of delusional bull**** again.

What's the going rate for a go-fer like you these days?

I told you, about a buck and a half. Not bad for a guy that you allege
didn't graduate from high school.

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

On 12/18/10 7:55 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On 12/17/10 3:59 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On 12/17/10 3:08 PM, BAR wrote:


I'll bet you are jealous. You couldn't get near an ivy league school nor
would England let you anywhere near Oxford or Cambridge.


Another of your fantasies, eh? How the hell would you know my college
capabilities? After all, it's not as if you succeeded in pursuing a
college degree. You didn't have the intellectual wherewithal to even
complete a course of study at Montgomery College. Did you even graduate
from high school?

Maybe, maybe not. But, I still make more money than you and that is what
****es you off to no end.

Oh no, not that piece of delusional bull**** again.

What's the going rate for a go-fer like you these days?

I told you, about a buck and a half. Not bad for a guy that you allege
didn't graduate from high school.




A buck-and-a-half does not put you in the position you think you are,
vis-a-vis my annual earnings. Sorry.

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote:
HarryK wrote:
On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:





On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he

http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...


Nor he

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...


Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little
in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in
the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she
was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can
be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can*
believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in
your younger years.

You crack me up. :-


Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors.
She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a
master's degree.
She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from
Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU.

She worked several years for a top management consulting organization
and for a venture capital group.

Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her
say she is well-mannered.

There is no record of public intoxication for her.

Nice try.

How are your kids doing?

Any of them at Oxford?
Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who
posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA.


Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as
many as "the contender."

Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of
snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you
make one, I award you a "Snotty."

thank you for your participation.




"Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself.


Another Snotty for Ziggy.

I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice.

Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the
negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a
couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i
started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side.
LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other
posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties."

My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this
newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see.




Ah. A window into the mind of a student of the liberal arts. Not much to see, I'm afraid



Another Snotty for you for your personal insult.

The point is that it is posters on your side of the fence who post most
of the personal insults here. Every Snotty you earn helps prove my point.

Thank you and have an insult-free day.

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

"HarryK" wrote in message ...
On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote:
HarryK wrote:
On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:





On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he

http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...


Nor he

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...


Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little
in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in
the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she
was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can
be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can*
believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in
your younger years.

You crack me up. :-


Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors.
She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a
master's degree.
She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from
Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU.

She worked several years for a top management consulting organization
and for a venture capital group.

Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her
say she is well-mannered.

There is no record of public intoxication for her.

Nice try.

How are your kids doing?

Any of them at Oxford?
Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who
posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA.


Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as
many as "the contender."

Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of
snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you
make one, I award you a "Snotty."

thank you for your participation.




"Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself.


Another Snotty for Ziggy.

I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice.

Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the
negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a
couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i
started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side.
LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other
posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties."

My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this
newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see.




Ah. A window into the mind of a student of the liberal arts. Not much to see, I'm afraid

--
Ziggy®

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

On 12/18/10 8:06 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 7:55 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On 12/17/10 3:59 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On 12/17/10 3:08 PM, BAR wrote:


I'll bet you are jealous. You couldn't get near an ivy league
school nor
would England let you anywhere near Oxford or Cambridge.


Another of your fantasies, eh? How the hell would you know my college
capabilities? After all, it's not as if you succeeded in pursuing a
college degree. You didn't have the intellectual wherewithal to even
complete a course of study at Montgomery College. Did you even
graduate
from high school?

Maybe, maybe not. But, I still make more money than you and that is
what
****es you off to no end.

Oh no, not that piece of delusional bull**** again.

What's the going rate for a go-fer like you these days?

I told you, about a buck and a half. Not bad for a guy that you allege
didn't graduate from high school.




A buck-and-a-half does not put you in the position you think you are,
vis-a-vis my annual earnings. Sorry.

I have to be fair and give myself a Snotty for this post. Sorry.

Off T: She didn't make the list
 

"HarryK" wrote in message
...
On 12/17/10 10:09 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On 12/17/10 9:43 PM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
On 12/17/10 9:24 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On 12/17/10 6:16 PM, HarryK wrote:


You tell the biggest whoppers, but that is why I like you. We talk
about
Kruger at least 10 times a day.

One "Snotty" for the Harry spoofer.

One "lobsta boat" for Harry...



One "Snotty" for Scotty. Two for him so far since 4:45 pm.

He's making up for lost time.

I'm just keeping track, not commenting on the content, other than to
point out "Snotties."

And every post is a troll, so far you have about trolls today just
yourself... So keep counting...


Another Snotty for Scotty.

He deserved two this time... for his bad grammar.