|
Off T: She didn't make the list
"HarryK" wrote in message ...
On 12/18/10 8:15 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. Another Snotty for Ziggy. I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice. Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side. LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties." My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see. Ah. A window into the mind of a student of the liberal arts. Not much to see, I'm afraid Another Snotty for you for your personal insult. The point is that it is posters on your side of the fence who post most of the personal insults here. Every Snotty you earn helps prove my point. Thank you and have an insult-free day. And I would like to highlight that no one could ever consider my "Snottys" to be considered an insult. They are my way of improving the tone of rec.boats. I have been an inspiration to rec.boaters for over 15 yrs. and my "Snottys" are just another one of my imaginative innovations for my fans. Actually, the snottys are in and of themselves, snotty -- Ziggy® |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:02 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. Another Snotty for Ziggy. I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice. Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side. LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties." My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see. Ah. A window into the mind of a student of the liberal arts. Not much to see, I'm afraid Another Snotty for you for your personal insult. The point is that it is posters on your side of the fence who post most of the personal insults here. Every Snotty you earn helps prove my point. Thank you and have an insult-free day. Doesn't prove anything... The proof is in the posts of the last month and we have all been here to see it despite your childish game... As I stated, I started to keep count yesterday. And your insult earns you another...Snotty. Hey, if you stop insulting other posters, you'll not earn another Snotty. Easy, eh? |
Off T: She didn't make the list
"HarryK" wrote in message ...
On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:06 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 7:55 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 3:59 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 3:08 PM, BAR wrote: I'll bet you are jealous. You couldn't get near an ivy league school nor would England let you anywhere near Oxford or Cambridge. Another of your fantasies, eh? How the hell would you know my college capabilities? After all, it's not as if you succeeded in pursuing a college degree. You didn't have the intellectual wherewithal to even complete a course of study at Montgomery College. Did you even graduate from high school? Maybe, maybe not. But, I still make more money than you and that is what ****es you off to no end. Oh no, not that piece of delusional bull**** again. What's the going rate for a go-fer like you these days? I told you, about a buck and a half. Not bad for a guy that you allege didn't graduate from high school. A buck-and-a-half does not put you in the position you think you are, vis-a-vis my annual earnings. Sorry. I have to be fair and give myself a Snotty for this post. Sorry. Another Snotty for the ID Spoofer. And there was nothing snotty about my comment. Sorry. REALLY? -- Ziggy® |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:02 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 9:00 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:55 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:53 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:45 AM, YukonBound wrote: "HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's what they do. I can't argue against what you are saying there. But there's no reason to play their game. If all they can do is insult other posters, then that will be very obvious. We should refrain from playing along with that. PS - I take back all of the Snotty's I award you, you were screwing up my statistics. Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/453...ke-in-my-mouth Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:04 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 9:01 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. Another Snotty for Ziggy. I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice. Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side. LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties." My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see. Your little game means nothing, we have all been here. The fact is, JPS, Don, Slammer, Bob, Paul, and Plum never stopped calling names and trolling, right from day one, you lasted a few weeks longer but failed too... This little troll game of yours is no different, it's all there, call it what you will... Ok here is another Snotty for you. Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:13 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 9:02 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. Another Snotty for Ziggy. I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice. Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side. LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties." My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see. Ah. A window into the mind of a student of the liberal arts. Not much to see, I'm afraid Another Snotty for you for your personal insult. The point is that it is posters on your side of the fence who post most of the personal insults here. Every Snotty you earn helps prove my point. Thank you and have an insult-free day. Doesn't prove anything... The proof is in the posts of the last month and we have all been here to see it despite your childish game... As I stated, I started to keep count yesterday. And your insult earns you another...Snotty. Hey, if you stop insulting other posters, you'll not earn another Snotty. Easy, eh? Another Snotty for the Harry ID Spoofer. For now on I am going to call the Harry ID Spoofers them HIDS for short. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:05 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 9:11 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:15 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. Another Snotty for Ziggy. I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice. Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side. LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties." My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see. Ah. A window into the mind of a student of the liberal arts. Not much to see, I'm afraid Another Snotty for you for your personal insult. The point is that it is posters on your side of the fence who post most of the personal insults here. Every Snotty you earn helps prove my point. Thank you and have an insult-free day. And I would like to highlight that no one could ever consider my "Snottys" to be considered an insult. They are my way of improving the tone of rec.boats. I have been an inspiration to rec.boaters for over 15 yrs. and my "Snottys" are just another one of my imaginative innovations for my fans. Actually, the snottys are in and of themselves, snotty NO they are not. Here is another Snotty for you. Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:07 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 9:13 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:06 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 7:55 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 3:59 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 3:08 PM, BAR wrote: I'll bet you are jealous. You couldn't get near an ivy league school nor would England let you anywhere near Oxford or Cambridge. Another of your fantasies, eh? How the hell would you know my college capabilities? After all, it's not as if you succeeded in pursuing a college degree. You didn't have the intellectual wherewithal to even complete a course of study at Montgomery College. Did you even graduate from high school? Maybe, maybe not. But, I still make more money than you and that is what ****es you off to no end. Oh no, not that piece of delusional bull**** again. What's the going rate for a go-fer like you these days? I told you, about a buck and a half. Not bad for a guy that you allege didn't graduate from high school. A buck-and-a-half does not put you in the position you think you are, vis-a-vis my annual earnings. Sorry. I have to be fair and give myself a Snotty for this post. Sorry. Another Snotty for the ID Spoofer. And there was nothing snotty about my comment. Sorry. REALLY? NO there wasn't. Here is another snotty for you. Another Snotty for the Harry ID Spoofer |
Off T: She didn't make the list
"HarryK" wrote in message ...
On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. I ask you, is that fair play? -- Ziggy® |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com