![]() |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On 26-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: Haven't produced anything of value (or the junk you buy) in the U.S. since 2004. IOW Idiots on Wheels? |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On 26-Sep-2010, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Harry=AE?= wrote: I'm certain that 1) you didn't produce anything of value in the US at any point, and you certainly don't do it now. Are you still trying to find your penis? Gotta save that one for the list. It's really useful in the 7th grade. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On 26-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: That is ABSOLUTELY TRUE for the three months of the move from the U.S. IOW Idiots on wheels? while he bleats that the american middle class should buy american so the rich can stay rich, he deserts the US because he can't compete. You're living in the distant past - very few profitable firms produce in the U,.S; there's no reason to. The unprofitable are gone, or had to move overseas. NO company exists except to make a profit for it's shareholders. All that's thriving and expanding are government (on your dime), and insurance, banking, investment, legal and medical scams. None of those produce anything except collective distribution. I couldn't care less what you buy, it's your free choice, and to suffer from the choices you make. Why would a company produce a product in the U.S? I really want to know - just one reason? ....the advantages are .. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On 26-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: PS: Let's look at the debacle from a different perspective. Why would ANY company produce in the U,.S. except in the rare case of disadvantageous freight costs? university educational system close to large markets cheap labor force non unionized that lionizes the right wing lots of religious fanatics willing to work for nothing couldn't think of any...didn't think you would. Funny tongue-in-cheek attempts, though |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:23:39 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote: On 26-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: That is ABSOLUTELY TRUE for the three months of the move from the U.S. IOW Idiots on wheels? in other words... while he bleats that the american middle class should buy american so the rich can stay rich, he deserts the US because he can't compete. You're living in the distant past - very few profitable firms produce in the U,.S; now let's see...the world's largest economy is?? oh, yeah...the US. i agree the US manufacturing sector is shrinking. the right wing thinks wages are a form of welfare so they prefer to manufacture in places where slavery is legal and there are no unions, like china I couldn't care less what you buy, it's your free choice, and to suffer from the choices you make. no, we suffer from the choices YOU make as a right wing enabler of corporate thievery |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On 26-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: Why do you listen to political shills on the radio? Too much time on the unemployment line? says the right winger who thinks rush limbaugh is god I'll try once more - why do you listen to that crap? No job? On "disability"? |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On 26-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: That is ABSOLUTELY TRUE for the three months of the move from the U.S. IOW Idiots on wheels? in other words... Must be abn old AOL term or for people that "text." (A noun, not a verb, but what the hell......) while he bleats that the american middle class should buy american so the rich can stay rich, he deserts the US because he can't compete. You're living in the distant past - very few profitable firms produce in the U,.S; now let's see...the world's largest economy is?? 1) I said produce, 2) By far red China out produces the U.S. The comparisn in in $, so the "facts" are skewed. If red China's output were on a monetary wage equivalency with the inflated wages of the U.S. red China would be 4 times that of the U.S. oh, yeah...the US. i agree the US manufacturing sector is shrinking. the right wing thinks wages are a form of welfare so they prefer to manufacture in places where slavery is legal and there are no unions, like china I couldn't care less what you buy, it's your free choice, and to suffer from the choices you make. no, we suffer from the choices YOU make as a right wing enabler of corporate thievery I regret that event - please explain what was stolen, and how. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:50:51 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote: On 26-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: That is ABSOLUTELY TRUE for the three months of the move from the U.S. IOW Idiots on wheels? in other words... Must be abn old AOL term or for people that "text." (A noun, not a verb, but what the hell......) nah, pretty standard stuff. you need to keep up with technology while he bleats that the american middle class should buy american so the rich can stay rich, he deserts the US because he can't compete. You're living in the distant past - very few profitable firms produce in the U,.S; now let's see...the world's largest economy is?? 1) I said produce, 2) By far red China out produces the U.S. meaningless. i'm in the semiconductor business. china does not have our technology. china does not have our universities. and what the chinese call an 'engineer' is basically a lab technician you're just too dumb to know the facts instead, relying on rush to tell you what to believe The comparisn in in $, so the "facts" are skewed. If red China's output were on a monetary wage equivalency with the inflated wages of the U.S. red China would be 4 times that of the U.S. gee. too bad their wages suck, huh? oh, yeah...the US. i agree the US manufacturing sector is shrinking. the right wing thinks wages are a form of welfare so they prefer to manufacture in places where slavery is legal and there are no unions, like china I couldn't care less what you buy, it's your free choice, and to suffer from the choices you make. no, we suffer from the choices YOU make as a right wing enabler of corporate thievery I regret that event - please explain what was stolen, and how. what was stolen was the US middle class. funny you ignore the fact germany, france, sweden and switzerland dont have this problem you're kinda stupid that way. you're very emotional and dont like facts |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:25:12 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote: On 26-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: PS: Let's look at the debacle from a different perspective. Why would ANY company produce in the U,.S. except in the rare case of disadvantageous freight costs? university educational system close to large markets cheap labor force non unionized that lionizes the right wing lots of religious fanatics willing to work for nothing couldn't think of any...didn't think you would. Funny tongue-in-cheek attempts, though most of this was tongue in cheek but, go ahead, find me a chinese stanford university, OK? 40 of the top 50 universities in the world are in teh US. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:27:11 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote: On 26-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: Why do you listen to political shills on the radio? Too much time on the unemployment line? says the right winger who thinks rush limbaugh is god I'll try once more - why do you listen to that crap? No job? On "disability"? i haven't listened to rush in 30 y ears. you can't make the same claim, though. your brain is just programmed for the simple stuff |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com