the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On 9/24/10 10:33 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 22-Sep-2010, wrote: Sounds like you're the one who likes taking it up the ass... I SOUND LIKE BAWNY FWANK?? No. Barney Frank is actually an intelligent, decent, and influential person. Bawny Fwank is lower on the food chanin that most politicians who are below cockroaches. Thinking like yours is why you vote the way you do, then bellyache about getting it up the ass again. (Like Bawny) After her last comment you must know she is just trolling, right? I mean, anyone with a brain and any interest knows BF is one of the most responsible for where we are today with the bailouts and the housing market... But the racists in his district will in fact re-elect him, no problem. The "racists" in his district? To whom are you referring, little man with little brain? |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On 22-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: Couldn't care less about political crime syndicates, or Darwin - it is observable that when people do things to hurt themselves, they suffer. "Americans" do, they suffer, yeah. t hey keep voting right wing and the more competent will modify their behavior and survive. That portion makes up about 3% of the former U.S; 97% will be peasants. It's the individual's choice to decide their direction. Stop begging for handouts from the root of the problem. meaningless cliche 1100. Those comments are without substance. Do you have a solution to the demise of the U.S? What is it? More help from "the government?" Governments don't create or drive a successful economy - governments are consumers of assets. They can only interfere (as they have since the 70's) or enable multi level output, which they have crushed. Can they drive everything out of the U.S? .............. "YES WE CAN!!!" .... in the best tradition of Ford, Carter,Reagan, Bush, Clinton, and Bush again. The coffins been nailed - Hussein and congress is just throwing the dirt on the casket. The incoming herd of scum will continue the trend, with your money. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:26:18 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote: On 22-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: Use Vaseline, it's cheaper, and you don't have to vote to gain the thrill. you know NOTHING of technology or economics. you have never taken ANY coursework in any of these Coursework?? Like the asshole in the White House? oh. so you're against education? rush is all you need no wonder you're a sheep. I was a supplier to the automotive industry for nearly 40 years - I watched steel become decimated by subsidized imports authorized by Nixon, no, what you watched was steel being replaced by plastic. there isn't alot of steel left in cars, you moron There is no "recession." there is an economic adjustment to the core economic output. Nothing can change that except the behavior of the U.S. consumers, and they don't appear willing. The slime you elect couldn't care less as long as you reelect them. the slime YOU elected...the right wing...deregulated us into poverty while enriching their buddies |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:28:01 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote: On 22-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: True but you forgot the 4th Bush brother ... and the current one it turns out. you mean the ones who are bound by treaty obligations? They weren't treaties, treaties have to be ratified by the scum in the senate. They are merely trade agreements, and can be altered or quashed at any time. really? from the wikipedia site: In 1988 Canada and the United States signed the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement after which the U.S. Congress approved implementing legislation. The American government then entered into negotiations with the Mexican government for a similar treaty, and Canada asked to join the negotiations in order to preserve its perceived gains under the 1988 deal.[1] Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1986 between the three nations, the leaders met in San Antonio, Texas, on December 17, 1992, to sign NAFTA. U.S. President George H. W. Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and Mexican President Carlos Salinas, each responsible for spearheading and promoting the agreement, ceremonially signed it. The agreement then needed to be ratified by each nation's legislative or parliamentary branch. ---------- see the word 'treaty' there? |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:47:08 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote: On 22-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: Couldn't care less about political crime syndicates, or Darwin - it is observable that when people do things to hurt themselves, they suffer. "Americans" do, they suffer, yeah. t hey keep voting right wing and the more competent will modify their behavior and survive. That portion makes up about 3% of the former U.S; 97% will be peasants. It's the individual's choice to decide their direction. Stop begging for handouts from the root of the problem. meaningless cliche 1100. Those comments are without substance. Do you have a solution to the demise of the U.S? What is it? More help from "the government?" yeah. strengthen unions. increase taxes on the wealthy. regulate the banks and financial institutions to prevent their raping of the economy. enter into worldwide labor agreements to ensure all workers are at equal purchasing power parity, including healthcare, so that we dont engage in a race to the bottom. Governments don't create or drive a successful economy - governments are consumers of assets. They can only interfere (as they have since the 70's) or enable multi level output, which they have crushed. wrong. they can also make investments, such as infrastructure, educational institutions, hospitals, etc. you simply dont know economics |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message ...
On 22-Sep-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: I pay for advertising, there's no such thing as "free." Just keep dragging it home. Sounds like you don't even pay for chewing gum. Sounds like you're a freeloader. 60% of the population of the U.S. is a welfare class - I am the production class, one of the evil rich (as classified by your rulers as people that can afford to live without welfare) that hire the middle class (but not in the U.S. any more.) Gum is cheap where I live; I don't pay U.S. inflated retail prices while making Walmart wages. Never will. It's all up to you. If you're looking for more handouts, go to the Salvation Army - they have a great selection of cold weather clothes coming in for the new American "middle class." You can't tell Plume anything about the Salvation Army. They are her prime competition in the used clothing business. She takes pride in the fact that all of her product gets fumigated with DDT to kill the bed bugs. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message ... On 22-Sep-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Then what is everyone complaining about? Your industries are gone, marketing companies with minimum wage gum chewing clerks in ugly blue vests are the new "middle class." All is rosy! You're the complainer. You can't handle actual capitalism, so you quit. Unless of course, you're just lying. You speak as thought you're constrained in the former United States. NO one is, so you don't need to squeal and beg from your neighbors (taxpayers.) I didn't enter this fray to complain, but merely to show the ignorant masses how their behavior is trashing their well being. Yet all you do is whine and complain. Sounds like you're afraid of your own shadow. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message ... On 22-Sep-2010, "Harry ?" wrote: Sounds like you're the one who likes taking it up the ass... I SOUND LIKE BAWNY FWANK?? Here's hoping Bawney takes it up the ass in November. He probably is right NOW! He'll be reelected - it's the natuie of the voting nitwits. I guarantee that he's done more for this country than you have or will. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:28:01 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz" wrote: On 22-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: True but you forgot the 4th Bush brother ... and the current one it turns out. you mean the ones who are bound by treaty obligations? They weren't treaties, treaties have to be ratified by the scum in the senate. They are merely trade agreements, and can be altered or quashed at any time. really? from the wikipedia site: In 1988 Canada and the United States signed the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement after which the U.S. Congress approved implementing legislation. The American government then entered into negotiations with the Mexican government for a similar treaty, and Canada asked to join the negotiations in order to preserve its perceived gains under the 1988 deal.[1] Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1986 between the three nations, the leaders met in San Antonio, Texas, on December 17, 1992, to sign NAFTA. U.S. President George H. W. Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and Mexican President Carlos Salinas, each responsible for spearheading and promoting the agreement, ceremonially signed it. The agreement then needed to be ratified by each nation's legislative or parliamentary branch. ---------- see the word 'treaty' there? He's a hateful little man, who apparently abandon his country and his company. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com